A floral ontogenetic investigation of the Hydrangeaceae

Nordic Journal of Botany

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 235-254

  Roels, P ^a   Ronse Decraene, L P ^a   Smets, E F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORNALES; DEUTZIA; HYDRANGEA; HYDRANGEACEAE; KIRENGESHOMA; KIRENGESHOMA PALMATA; LOASACEAE; PHILADELPHUS; PHILADELPHUS PURPURASCENS; SAXIFRAGACEAE;

EID: 9844250758     PISSN: 0107055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1997.tb00315.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bensel, C. R. & Palser, B. F. 1975. Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato. III. Kirengeshomoideae, Hydrangeoideae and Escallonioideae. - Amer. J. Bot. 62: 676-687.
2. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. - Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Dahlgren, G. 1989. The last dahlgrenogram: system of classification of the dicotyledons. - In: Tan, K. (ed.). The Davis and Hedge Festschrift. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 249-260.
4. Dahlgren, R. 1975. The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system. I. Some embryological characters. - Bot. Notiser 128: 181-197.
5. _ 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91-124.
6. _ 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. - Nord. J. Bot. 3: 119-149.
7. _, Jensen, S. R. & Nielsen, B. J. 1981. A revised classification of the angiosperms with comments on relation between chemical and other characters. - In: Young, D. A. & Seigler, D. S. (eds), Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny. Praeger, New York, pp. 149-204.
8. Downie, S. R. & Palmer, J. D. 1992. Restriction site mapping of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat: a molecular phylogeny of the Asteridae. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 266-283.
9. Eckert, G. 1966. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und blütenanatomische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Obdiplostemonie. - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 85: 523-604.
10. Endress, P. K. & Stumpf, S. 1991. The diversity of stamen structures in "lower" Rosidae (Rosales, Fabales, Proteales, Sapindales). - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 107: 217-293.
11. Engler, A. 1930. Saxifragaceae. - In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 18a, ed. 2. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 74-226.
12. Erbar, C. 1991 Sympetaly - a systematic character ? - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 112: 417-451.
13. _ & Leins, P. 1988. Blütenentwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Aralia und Hedera. - Flora 180: 391-406.
14. _ & Leins, P. 1989. On the early development and the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in Campanula, Jasione and Lobelia. - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 111: 29-55.
15. Fehrenbach, S. & Barthlott, W. 1988. Micromorphologie der Epicuticularwachse der Rosales s.l. und deren systematische Gliederung. - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109: 407-428.
16. Gelius, L. 1967. Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte an Blüten der Saxifragales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Androeceums. - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87: 253-303.
17. Gerstberger, P. & Leins, P. 1978. Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Blütenknospen von Physalis philadelphica (Solanaceae) - Anwendung einer neuen Präparationsmethode. - Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 91: 381-387.
18. Grund, C. & Jensen, U. 1981. Systematic relationships of the Saxifragales revealed by serological characteristics of seed proteins. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 137: 1-22.
19. Gustafsson, M. H. G., Backlund, A. & Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the Asterales sensu lato based on rbcL sequences with particular reference to the Goodeniaceae. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 217-242.
20. Hempel, A. L., Reeves, P. A., Olmstead, R. G. & Jansen, R. K. 1995. Implications of rbcL data for higher order relationships of the Loasaceae and the anomalous aquatic plant Hydrostachys (Hydrostachaceae). - Pl. Syst. Evol. 194: 25-37.
21. Hideux, M. J. & Ferguson, I. K. 1976. The stereostructure of the exine and its evolutionary significance in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. - In: Ferguson, I. K. & Muller, J. (eds), The evolutionary significance of the exine. Academic Press, London, pp. 327-377.
22. Huber, H. 1963. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Rosiflorert. - Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 5: 1-48.
23. Hufford, L. 1988. Roles of early ontogenetic modifications in the evolution of floral form of Eucnide (Loasaceae). - Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109: 289-333.
24. _ 1989a. Structure of the inflorescence and flower of Petalonyx linearis (Loasaceae). - Pl. Syst. Evol. 163: 211-226.
25. _ 1989b. The structure and potential loasaceous affinities of Schismocarpus. - Nord. J. Bot. 9: 217-227.
26. _ 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 218-248.
27. _ 1995. Seed morphology of Hydrangeaceae and its implications. - Int. J. Pl. Sci. 156: 555-580.
28. _ 1996. Ontogenetic evolution in the diversification of androecia of Hydrangeaceae. - Amer. J. Bot. 83, 6, suppl.: 163 (abstract).
29. Hutchinson, J. 1927. XIV. - Contributions towards a phylogenetic classification of flowering plants: VI. The genera of Hydrangeaceae. - Kew Bull. 100-108.
30. Kappeler, G. 1995. Anlage des Androeciums bei einigen Vertretern der Hydrangeaceae. - 12. Symposium Morphologie, Anatomie, Systematik, abstracts.
31. Klink, V. & Bogle, A. L. 1995. Flower development in Broussaisia arguta Gaud. (Hydrangeaceae): a Hawaiian monotypic dioecious endemic. - Amer. J. Bot. 82, 6, suppl.: 31 (abstract).
32. Klopfer, K. 1971. Beiträge zur floralen Morphogenese und Histogenese der Saxifragaceae. 6. Die Hydrangeoideen. - Wiss. Z. Põd. Hochsch. Potsdam 15: 77-95.
33. _ 1973. Florale Morphogenese und Taxonomie der Saxifragaceae sensu lato. - Feddes Repert. 84: 475-516.
34. Krach, J. E. 1977. Seed characters in and affinities among Saxifragineae. - Pl. Syst. Evol., suppl. 1: 141-153.
35. Leins, P. 1967. Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Aegle marmelos (Rutaceae). - Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 80: 320-325.
36. Mabberley, D. J. 1990. The plant-book. A portable dictionary of the higher plants. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Morgan, D. R. & Soltis, D. E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 631-660.
38. Olmstead, R. G., Michaels, H. J., Scott, M. S. & Palmer, J. D. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequencing of rbcL. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 249-265.
39. Payer, J.-B. 1857. Traité d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. - Victor Masson, Paris.
40. Roels, P. & Smets, E. 1994. A comparative floral ontogenetical study between Adoxa moschatellina and Sambucus ebulus. - Belg. J. Bot. 127: 157-170.
41. _ & Smets, E. 1996. A floral ontogenetic study in the Dipsacales. - Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157, 2: 203-218.
42. Ronse Decraene, L.-P. & Smets, E. F. 1992. Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae: definition, distribution and systematic value. - Nord. J. Bot. 12: 621-649.
43. _ & Smets, E. F. 1995. The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 193-247.
44. _ & Smets, E. F. 1996. The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. - Feddes Repert. 107: 1-17.
45. Schulze-Menz, G. K. 1964. Saxifragaceae. - In: Melchior, H. (ed.), Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 2, ed. 12. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp. 201-206.
46. Smets, E. F. 1988. Florale nektarien van de Magnoliophytina: karakterisering en systematische betekenis. - Doct. Thesis. Botanical Institute, K.U. Leuven.
47. Soltis, D. E., Xiang, Q.-Y. & Hufford, L. 1995. Relationships and evolution of Hydrangeaceae based on rbcL sequence data. - Amer. J. Bot. 82: 504-514.
48. Takhtajan, A. L. 1987. System of Magnoliophyta. - Academy of Sciences, Leningrad.
49. Thorne, R. F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. - Bot. Rev. 58: 225-348.
50. Vandeputte, E. 1993. Bloemontogenetische observaties en systematische verwantschappen binnen de Saxifragaceae sensu lato. - Licentiate Thesis. Botanical Institute, K.U. Leuven.
51. Werle, G. 1984. Zur Entwicklung des Gynoeceums bei Bergenia cordifolia (Saxifragaceae). - Pl. Syst. Evol. 147: 167-175.
52. Wettstein, R. von 1893. Über das Androeceum von Philadelphus. - Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 11: 480-484.
53. Winbauer, A. N. & Hufford, L. 1995. Androecial morphology and ontogeny of the sister genera Carpenteria and Philadelphus (Hydrangeaceae). - Amer. J. Bot. 82, 6, suppl.: 171 (abstract).
54. Xiang, Q.-Y., Soltis, D. E., Morgan, D. R. & Soltis, P. S. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornus L. sensu lato and putative relatives inferred from rbcL sequence data. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 723-735.