A comparison of urban-proximate and urban-distant wilderness users on selected variables

Environmental Management

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 927-935

  Ewert, Alan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Expectancy theory; Normative standards; Urbanization; Wilderness; Wilderness experience

Indexed keywords

WILDERNESS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS; URBAN PLANNING;

LAND USE;

PERCEPTION; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; WILDERNESS AREA;

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; EXPECTANCY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032212155     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900159     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bell, P., J. Fisher, and S. R. Loomis. 1978. Environmental psychology. Saunders, Philadelphia.
2. Brunswik, E. 1956. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. University of California Press, Berkeley.
3. Christensen, J. E. 1993. Affective choice in recreation with particular emphasis on the urban setting: A first approximation. Pages 3-6 .in P. H. Gobster (ed.), Managing urban and high-use recreation settings. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-163. U S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, 142 pp.
4. Cook, B., and W. Borrie. 1995. Trends in recreation use and management of wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness 1(2):30-34.
5. Cox, H. 1965. The secular city: Secularization and urbanization in theological perspectives. Macmillan, New York.
6. Dickerhoof, H. E. and A. W. Ewert. 1993. Urban forestry research: The Forest Service perspective. Journal of Arboriculture 19(3):143-151.
7. Ewert, A. W., and D. Hood. 1995. Urban-proximate and urban-distant wilderness: An exploratory comparison between two "types" of wilderness. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 13(2):73-85.
8. Hall, T, and B. Shelby. 1996. Who cares about encounters? Differences between those with and without norms. Leisure Sciences 18:7-22.
9. Hammill, W. E., and W. M. Rutlin. 1995. Use encounter standards and curves for achieved privacy in wilderness. Leisure Sciences 17:245-262.
10. Hendee, J. C., W. R. Catton, L. D. Marlow, and C. F. Brockman. 1968. Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest - their characteristics, values, and management preferences. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-61, 92 pp., illus. Pacific Northwest Forest & Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.
11. Higgins E. T. 1990. Personality, social psychology, and person-situated relations: Standards and knowledge activation as a common language. Pages 301-338 in L. A. Pervin (ed.). Handbook of personality. Guiford, New York.
12. Higgins, E. T., and J. A. Bargh. 1987. Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology 3:369-425.
13. Knopf, R. C. 1983. Recreational needs and behavior in natural settings. In I. I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill (eds.), Human behavior and environment: Vol. 6, Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum Press, New York.
14. Krumpe, E., and G. Stokes. 1994. Application of the limits of acceptable change planning a process in USDA Forest Service Wilderness management. Pages 186-191 in J. Hendee and V. Martin (eds.), International wilderness allocation, management, and research. The WILD Foundation, Fort Collins, Colorado.
15. Lewis, M. S., D. W. Lime, and D. H. D. W. Anderson. 1996. Paddle canoeists' encounter norms in Minnesota's Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Leisure Sciences 18:143-160.
16. Lucas, R. C. 1980. Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas. Research Paper INT-253. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
17. Majeske, C. 1993. Wilderness planning and management at the urban interface. Master's thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 118 pp.
18. Marsh, H. W. 1993. Academic self-concept: theory, measurement and research. Pages 1-26 in J. Suls (ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 4. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
19. Mitchell, J. M. 1990. Do we really want wilderness management standards to be uniform? Pages 79-83 in B. Shelby, G. Stankey & B. Schindler (eds.), Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management - a workshop proceedings USDA Forest Service Technical Report, Portland, OR, PNW-GTR-305, 112 pp.
20. Miller, D. T., and D. A. Prentice. 1996. The construction of social norms and standards. Pages 799-829 in E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles Guilford Press, New York.
21. Olson, J. M., N.J. Roese, and M. P. Zanna. 1996. Expectancies. Pages 211-238 in E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (eds.), social psychology: Handbook of basic principles Guilford Press, New York.
22. Pizzorno, A. 1991. On the individualistic theory of social order. Pages 209-231 in P. Bourdieu and J. Coleman (eds.), Social theory for a changing society. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
23. Prud'Homme, R. 1989. New trends in the cities of the world. Pages 44-57 in R. Knight and G. Gappert (eds.), Cities in a global society. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
24. Roese, N. J., and J. M. Olson (eds.). 1995. What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.
25. Roggenbuck, J. W., and R. C. Lucas. 1987. Wilderness use and user characteristics: A state-of-knowledge review. Pages 204-245 in R. Lucas (comp.). Proceedings - national wilderness research conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. GTR-INT-220. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Ogden, UT.
26. Roggenbuck, J. W., D. R. Williams, S. P. Bange, and D.J. Dean. 1991. River float trip encounters norms: Questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research 23:133-153.
27. Rothbart, M., M. Evans, and S. Fulero. 1979. Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15:343-355.
28. Shafer, C. S., and W. E. Hammitt. 1995. Congruency among experience dimensions, condition indicators, and coping behaviors in wilderness. Leisure Sciences 17:263-279.
29. Shelby, B., J. J. Vaske, and M. P. Donnelly. 1996. Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences 18:103-123.
30. Shin, W. S., and R. Jaakson. 1997. Wilderness quality and visitors' wilderness attitudes: Management Implications. Environmental Management 21:225-232.
31. Sparks, P., D. Hedderley, and R. Shepherd. 1991. Expectancy-value models of attitudes: A note on the relationship between theory and methodology. European Journal of Social Psychology 21:261-271.
32. Stankey, G. H. 1973. Visitor perception of wilderness carrying capacity. Research Paper INT-142. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
33. Vaske, J., B. Shelby, A. Graefe, and T. Heberlein. 1986. Backcountry encounter norms: Theory, method and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 18:137-153.
34. Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, and J. P. Petruzzi. 1996. Country of origin, encounter norms, and crowding in a frontcountry setting. Leisure Sciences 18:161-176.
35. Whittaker, D. 1992. Selecting indicators: which impacts matter more? Pages 13-22 in B. Shelby, G. Stankey and B. Shindler (eds.), Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management - a workshop proceedings, 10-11 April 1990, Fort Collins, Colorado. PNW-GTR-305. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon.
36. Williams, D., J. Roggenbuck, M. Patterson, and A. Watson. 1992. The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest Science 38:738-756.
37. Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inference. American Psychologist 35:151-175.