Flatness-based control of nonlinear delay systems: A chemical reactor example

International Journal of Control

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 871-890

  Mounier, H ^a   Rudolph, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTORS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DELAY CONTROL SYSTEMS; DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; SYSTEM STABILITY; TRACKING (POSITION); TRAJECTORIES;

FEEDBACK STABILIZATION; LINEAR DELAY SYSTEMS; OPEN LOOP TRACKING CONTROLLER; TRAJECTORY TRACKING CONTROL;

NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032205898     PISSN: 00207179     EISSN: 13665820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002071798221614     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aris, R., 1965, Introduction to the Analysis of Chemical Reactors (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
2. Brethe, D., and Loiseau, J., 1996, A result that could bear fruit for the control of delaydifferential systems. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Mediterranean Symposium on Control Automation, Chania, Greece, pp. 115-128.
3. Chelouah, A., Delaleau, E., Martin, P., and Rouchon, P., 1996, Differential flatness and control of induction motors. Proceedings of the Symposium on Control, Optimization and Supervision, Computational Engineering in Systems Application IMACS Multiconference, Lille, 9-12 July 1996 (CESA’96), pp. 80-85.
4. Chiasson, J., 1995, A new approach to dynamic feedback linearization control of an induction motor. Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, pp. 2173-2178.
5. Cohn, R. M., 1970, A difference-differential basis theorem. Can. J. Math., XXII, 1224-1237.
6. Delaleau, E., and Rudolph, J., 1998, Control of flat systems by quasi-static feedback of generalized states. Int. J. Control, 71, 745-765.
7. Fliess, M., 1989 a, Automatique et corps differentiels. Forum Math., 1, 227-238.
8. Fliess, M., 1989b, Some remarks on nonlinear input-output systems with delays. In J. Descusse, M. Fliess, A. Isidori and D. Leborgne (Eds), New Trends in Nonlinear Control Theory (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), pp. 172-181.
9. Fliess, M., 1990, Generalized controller canonical forms for linear and nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, AC-35, 994-1001.
10. Fliess, M., and Glad, S. T., 1993, An algebraic approach to linear and nonlinear control. In H. L. Trentelman and J. C. Willems (Eds), Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and its Applications (Boston: Birkhauser), pp. 223-267.
11. Fliess, M., and Mounier, H., 1998, Controllability and observability of linear delay systems: an algebraic approach. COCV (Control, Optimization and Calculus of Variations), 3, 301-314 (URL: http://www.emath.fr/COCV/).
12. Fliess, M., and Rudolph, J., 1997, Corps de Hardy et observateurs asymptotiques locaux pour systemes differentiellement plats. C. R Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. IIb, 324, 513-519.
13. Fliess, M., Levine, J., Martin, P., and Rouchon, P., 1992, Sur les systemes non lineaires differentiellement plats. C. R Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I Math., 315, 619-624.
14. Fliess, M., Levine, J., Martin, P., and Rouchon, P., 1995, Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: Introductory theory and examples. Int. J. Control, 61, 1327-1361.
15. Henson, M. A., and Seborg, D. E., 1994, Time delay compensation for nonlinear processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33, 1493-1500.
16. Kravaris, C., and Wright, R., 1989, Deadtime compensation for nonlinear processes. AIChEJ, 35, 1535-1542.
17. Levine, J., Lottin, J., and Ponsart, J., 1996, A nonlinear approach to the control of magnetic bearings. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., 4, 524-544.
18. Manitius, A., and Olbrot, A., 1979, Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 24, 541-553.
19. Martin, P., Devasia, S., and Paden, B. 1996, A different look at output tracking: Control of a VTOL aircraft. Automatica, J. IFAC, 32, 101-107.
20. Martin, P., Murray, R. M., and Rouchon, P., 1997, Flat systems. In G. Bastin and M. Gevers (Eds), Plenary Lectures and Mini-Courses, 4th European Control Conference, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 211-264.
21. Mounier, H., 1995, Proprietes structurelles des systemes lineaires a retards: aspects theoriques et pratiques. These de Doctorat, Universite Paris-Sud, Orsay.
22. Mounier, H., and Rudolph, J., 1997, First steps towards flatness based control of a class of nonlinear chemical reactors with time delays. Proceedings of the 4th European Control Conference, Brussels, Belgium. Paper no. 508.
23. Mounier, H., Rouchon, P., and Rudolph, J., 1997, Some examples of linear systems with delays. RAIRO-APII-JESA, 31, 911-925.
24. Murray, R. M., 1995, Nonlinear control of mechanical systems: a Lagrangian perspective. Proceedings of the Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Design 1995, pp. 378-389.
25. Nijmeijer, H., and Van der Schaft, A. J., 1990, Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems (New York: Springer).
26. Petit, N., Creff, Y., and Rouchon, P., 1997, a-freeness of a class of linear delay systems. Proceedings of the 4th European Control Conference, Brussels. Paper no. 520.
27. Rothfuss, R., Rudolph, J., and Zeitz, M., 1996, Flatness based control of a nonlinear chemical reactor model. Automatica, J. IFAC, 32, 1433-1439.
28. Rouchon, P., 1995, Necessary condition and genericity of dynamic feedback linearization. J. Math. Systems Estim. Control, 5, 345-358.
29. Rudolph, J., 1994, A canonical form under quasi-static feedback. In U. Helmke, R. Mennicken and J. Saurer (Eds), Systems and Networks: Mathematical Theory and Applications, Vol. II, Proc. Int. Symposium MTNS’98, Regensburg, Germany, 2^6 August 1993 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), pp. 445-448.
30. Rudolph, J., 1996, Flatness of some examples of coupled chemical reactors. Proceedings of the Symposium on Control, Optimization and Supervision; Computational Engineering in Systems Application, IMACS Multiconference, Lille, 9-12 July 1996 (CESA’96), pp. 206-210