Continuous-domain mathematical models for optimal process plant layout

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 3631-3639

  Papageorgiou, Lazaros G ^a   Rotstein, Guillermo E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL;

CONTINUOUS DIMENSIONAL SPACE; MIXED-INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

PLANT LAYOUT;

CHEMICAL PLANT; LAYOUT;

EID: 0032172484     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie980146v     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Mecklenburgh, J. C. Process Plant Layout; Institution of Chemical Engineers: London, 1985.
2. Francis, R. L.; White, J. A. Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach; Prentice-Hall International Series: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
3. Kusiak, A. S.; Heragu, S. The facility layout probleminvited review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1987, 29, 229.
4. Gunn, D. J.; Al-Asadi, H. D. Computer aided layout of chemical plant: a computational method and case study. Comput.-Aided Des. 1987, 19, 131.
5. Suzuki, A.; Fuchino, T.; Muraki, M. An evolutionary method of arranging the plot plan for process plant layout. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24, 226.
6. Amorese, L.; Cena, V.; Mustacchi, C. A heuristic for the compact location of process components. Chem. Eng. Sei. 1991, 32, 119.
7. Jayakumar, S.; Reklaitis, G. V. Chemical plant layout via graph partitioning-I. Single level. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994,14, 441.
8. Penteado, F. D.; Ciric, A. R. An MINLP approach for safe process plant layout. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 1354.
9. Suzuki, A.; Fuchino, T.; Muraki, M. Equipment arrangement for batch plants in multifloor buildings with integer programming. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24, 737.
10. Jayakumar, S.; Reklaitis, G. V. Chemical plant layout via graph partitioning-II. Multiple levels. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 563.
11. Realff, M. J.; Shah, N.; Pantelides, C. C. Simultaneous design, layout and scheduling of pipeless batch plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996,20, 869.
12. Georgiadis, M. C.; Rotstein, G. E.; Macchietto, S. Optimal layout design in multipurpose batch plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 4852.
13. Georgiadis, M. C.; Schilling, G.; Rotstein, G. E.; Macchietto, S. A general mathematical programming approach for process plant layout. Comput. Chem. Eng., submitted for publication.
14. Bawa, A. Optimum routing of pipelines in predefined corridor network. Technical report; Air Products: Surrey, U.K., 1995.
15. Bazargan-Lari, M. Inter-cell layout design in a cellular manufacturing environment-a case study. In. Flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing; Ahmad, M. M., Sullivan, W. G., Eds.; Begel House Inc.: New York, 1997.
16. Williams, H. P. Model Building in Mathematical Programming; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 1993.
17. Biegler, L. T.; Grossmann, I. E.; Westerberg, A. W. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design; Prentice-Hall PTR: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997.
18. Tsai, R. D.; Malstrom, E. M.; Kuo, W. Three dimensional palletization of mixed box sizes. HE Trans. 1993, 25, 64.
19. Sahinidis, N. V.; Grossmann, I. E. Reformulation of multipperiod optimization model for long range planning in the chemical industry. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1991, IB, 255.
20. Brooke, A.; Kendrick, D.; Meeraus, A. GAMS: A User's Guide; The Scientific Press: San Francisco, 1988.
21. CPLEX Optimization Inc. Using the CPLEX Callable Library; CPLEX: Incline Village, NV, 1995.