An MINLP Approach for Safe Process Plant Layout

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1354-1361

  Penteado, Flavio D ^a   Ciric, Amy R ^a  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CHEMICAL PLANTS; COSTS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; PIPING SYSTEMS; SAFETY DEVICES;

FINANCIAL RISK; MIXED INTEGER NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; SAFE PROCESS PLANT LAYOUT;

PLANT LAYOUT;

EID: 0030126770     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie9502547     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AIChE/CCPS. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis; Center for Chemical Process Safety, AIChE: New York, 1989.
2. Brooke, A.; Kendrick, D.; Meeraus, A. GAMS - A User's Guide; Scientific Press: Redwood, CA, 1988.
3. Chen, C.; Kengskool, K. An AutoCAD-Based Expert Systems for Plant Layout. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1990, 19, 299.
4. Clemens, P L. Working With the Risk Assessment Matrix, 2nd ed.; Sverdurp Corp.: St. Louis, 1993.
5. Duran, M. A.; Grossmann, I. E. An Outer Approximation Algorithm for a Class of Mixed Integer Nonlinear Problems. Math. Program. 1986, 36, 307-339.
6. Fujita, K.; Akagi, S.; Hase, H. Hybrid Approach to Plant Layout Design Using Constraint-Directed Search and an Optimization Technique. 17th ASME Design Automation Conference, Miami, FL, 1991; DE Series; Vol. 32, No. 1, pp 131-138.
7. Garfinkel, R. S.; Nemhauser, G. L. Integer Programming; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1972.
8. Geoffrion, A. M. Generalized Benders Decomposition. JOTA 1974, 10, 237-260.
9. Harmonosky, C. M.; Tothero, G. K. A Multi-factor Plant Layout Methodology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1992, 30, 1773.
10. ICI - The Mond Index: How to Identify, Assess and Minimise Potential Hazards on Chemical Plant Units for New and Existing Processes, 2nd ed.; Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Explosion Hazards Section, Technical Department: Northwich, Cheshire, U.K., 1985.
11. Jayakumar, S.; Reklaitis, G. V. Chemical Plant Layout Via Graph Partitioning - I: Single Level. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 441.
12. Kern, R. How to Get the Best Process-Plant Layouts for Pumps and Compressors. Chem. Eng. 1977, 31, 131.
13. Kletz, T. What Went Wrong? Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters; Gulf Publishing Co.: Houston, TX, 1985.
14. Lees, F. P. Loss Prevention Industries, 1st ed.; Butterworths: Boston, 1980.
15. Madden, J.; Pulford, C.; Shadbolt, N. Plant Layout-Untouched By Human Hand? Chem. Eng. 1990, May 24, 32.
16. Mecklenburgh, J. C. Process Plant Layout, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1985.
17. Peters, M. S.; Timmerhaus, K. D. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
18. Rosenblatt, M. J. The Facilities Layout Problem: a Multigoal Approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1979, 17, 323.
19. Rosenblatt, M. J.; Golany, B. A Heuristic Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Formulation to the Plant Layout Problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1989, 27, 293.
20. Suzuki, A.; Fuchino, T.; Muraki, M.; Hayakawa, T. An Evolutionary Method of Arranging the Plot Plan for Process Plant Layout. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24, 226.
21. Urban, T. L. A Multiple Criteria Model for the Facilities Layout Problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1987, 25, 1805.
22. Yaman, R.; Gethin, D. T.; Clarke, M. J. An Effective Sorting Method for Facility Layout Construction. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1993, 31, 413.