Nonlinear characteristics of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions

Hearing Research

Volumn 122, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 109-118

  Nakajima, Hideko Heidi ^a   Mountain, David C ^a,b   Hubbard, Allyn E ^a,b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Electrical stimulation; Electrically evoked otoacoustic emission; Gerbil; Otoacoustic emission; Outer hair cell motility

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; GERBIL; HAIR CELL; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; GERBILLINAE; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0032145736     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00094-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Crawford and Fettiplace (1985) The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J. Physiol. 360, 359-379.
2. Gillespie P.G. Myosin Iβ and adaptation of hair cell transduction. Biophys. J. 68:1995;358s.
3. Gillespie P.G., Wagner M.C., Hudspeth A.J. Identification of a 120-kD hair-bundle myosin located near stereociliary tips. Neuron. 11:1993;581-594.
4. Hubbard A.E., Mountain D.C. Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. Science. 222:1983;510-512.
5. Hubbard A.E., Mountain D.C. Haircell forward and reverse transduction: Differential suppression and enhancement. Hear. Res. 43:1990;269-272.
6. Hudspeth A.J., Gillespie P.G. Pulling springs to tune transduction: adaptation by hair cells. Neuron. 12:1994;1-9.
7. Jerry R.A., Popel A.S., Brownell W.E. Outer hair cell length changes in an external electric field. II. The role of electrokinetic forces on the cell surface. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;2011-2017.
8. Kirk D.L., Yates G.K. Frequency tuning and acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3714-3725.
9. Kirk, D.L. and Yates, G.K. (1997) Enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig with displacements of the basilar membrane towards scala vestibuli. In: G.R. Popelka (Ed.), Abstracts of the 20th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, p. 123.
10. Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Rapid force production in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 42:1989;195-202.
11. Mountain, D.C., Hubbard, A.E. and McMullen, T.A. (1983) Electromechanical processes in the cochlea. In: E. de Boer and M.A. Viergever (Eds.), Mechanics of Hearing. Delft Univ. Press, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 119-126.
12. Murata K., Moriyama T., Hosokawa Y., Minami S. Alternating current induced otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 55:1991;201-214.
13. Naidu, R.C. and Mountain, D.C. (1997) Multiple stiffness gradients in the cochlea? In: E.R. Lewis, G.R. Long, R.F. Lyon, P.M. Narins, C.R. Steele and E. Hecht-Poinar (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, University of California, Berkeley, June 1996. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp. 542-548.
14. Nakajima, H.H., Mountain, D.C. and Hubbard, A.E. (1997) Electrically-evoked emission magnitude is an approximately linear function of current level near characteristic frequency and very nonlinear at low frequencies. In: E.R. Lewis, G.R. Long, R.F. Lyon, P.M. Narins, C.R. Steele and E. Hecht-Poinar (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, University of California, Berkeley, June 1996. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp. 399-405.
15. Nakajima H.H., Olson E.S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions from the apical turns of the gerbil cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;786-794.
16. Nakajima H.H., Olson E.S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Acoustic overstimulation enhances low-frequency electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions and reduces high-frequency emissions. Audit. Neurosci. 3:1996;79-99.
17. Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 92:1995;170-177.
18. Ren T. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea. Neurosci. Lett. 207:1996;167-170.
19. Ren T., Nuttall A.L. Extracochlear electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions: a model for in vivo assessment of outer hair cell electromotility. Hear. Res. 92:1996;178-183.
20. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: Experiment results. Hear. Res. 70:1993;121-126.
21. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Electrically evoked basilar membrane motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;3030-3041.
22. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions: direct comparisons with basilar membrane motion. Audit. Neurosci. 2:1996;301-308.
23. Yates, G.K. and Kirk, D.L. (1997) Modulation of electrically-evoked emissions by forward transduction gates in the outer hair cell. In: G.R. Popelka (Ed.), Abstracts of the 20th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, p. 123.