Scaling laws from geomagnetic time series

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 25, Issue 14, 1998, Pages 2621-2624

  Voros Z ^a,b,f   Kovacs P ^c   Juhasz A ^d   Kormendi A ^c   Green, A W ^a,e  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b Geophysical Institute   (Slovakia)

^c GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE OF HUNGARY   (Hungary)

^d EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^e DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Geophysical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETOSPHERE; SCALING LAWS; TIME SERIES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW;

DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; EXTENDED SELF SIMILARITY; FOURTH ORDER; GEOMAGNETIC FIELDS; HIGHER FREQUENCIES; HIGHER ORDER MOMENTS; LOW-FREQUENCY; ORDER STRUCTURE;

GEOMAGNETISM;

EXTENDED SELF SIMILARITY; GEOMAGNETIC TIME SERIES; SCALING LAWS;

EID: 0032119555     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/98GL01910     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benzi, R., S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Massaioli, and S. Succi, Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E, 48, R29-R32, 1993.
2. Benzi, R., L. Biferale, S. Ciliberto, M.V. Struglia, and R. Tripiccione, Scaling property of turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E, 53, R3025-R3027, 1996.
3. Campbell, W.H., Geomagnetic storms, the Dst ring-current myth and lognormal distributions, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 1171, 1996.
4. Carbone, V., P. Veltri, and R. Bruno, Experimental evidence for differences in the extended self-similarity scaling laws between fluid and magnetohydrodynamic turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3110-3113, 1995.
5. Carbone, V., R. Bruno, and P. Veltri, Evidences for extended self-similarity in hydromagnetic turbulence, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 121-124, 1996.
6. Chang, T., Low-dimensional behavior and symmetry breaking of stochastic systems near criticality - can these effects be observed in space and in the laboratory?, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 20, 691-694, 1992.
7. Consolini, G., L. Cafarella, P. De Michelis, M. Candidi, and A. Meloni, Non-gaussian probability distribution of short time scale magnetic field fluctuations at Terra Nova Bay (Antarctica), Proc. Cosmic Physics in the Year 2000, (Eds. Aiello, S. et al.), 127-130, 1997.
8. Davis, A., A. Marshak, W. Wiscombe, and R. Cahalan, Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields: observed, retrieved or simulated, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 8055-8072, 1994.
9. De Santis, A., and M. Chiappini, Automatic K scaling by means of fractal and harmonic analysis, Ann. Geophys., 10, 597-602, 1992.
10. Klimas, A.J., D.N. Baker, D.A. Roberts, D.H. Fairfield, and J. Büchner, A nonlinear dynamical analogue model of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 12253-12266, 1992.
11. Nishida, A., Geomagnetic diagnosis of the magnetosphere, Springer-Verlag, 1978.
12. Schertzer, D., and S. Lovejoy, Nonlinear variability in geophysics, 3, Scaling and multifractal processes, Lecture notes, Cargese, 1993.
13. Tsurutani, B.T., M. Sugiura, T. Iyemori, B.E. Goldstein, W.D. Gonzalez, S.I. Akasofu, and E.J. Smith, The non-linear response of AE to the IMF Bs driver: A spectral break at 5 hours, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 279-282, 1990.
14. Takalo, J., J. Timonen, and H. Koskinen, Correlation dimension and affinity of AE data and bicolored noise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1527-1530, 1993.
15. Vörös, Z., Fractal analysis applied to some geomagnetic storms observed at the Hurbanovo geomagnetic observatory, Ann. Geophys., 8, 191-193, 1990.
16. Vörös, Z., Planetary indices - an attempt at synthesis, Proc. VIIth IAGA workshop on geomagnetic observatories, Niemegk, in press, 1997