Input selection and localized disturbance rejection

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 175-183

  Cao, Yi ^a   Rossiter, Diane ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Control structure selection; Disturbance rejection; Process control

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROLLABILITY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SET THEORY;

CONTROL STRUCTURE SELECTION; INPUT DISTURBANCE ALIGNMENT; INPUT SELECTION; LOCALIZED DISTURBANCE REJECTION; VARIABLES;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0032099547     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-1524(97)00038-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Skogestad, S. and Morari, M., Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26, 2029-2035.
2. Luyben, W. L., The concept of "eigenstructure" in process control. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1988, 27, 206-208.
3. Skogestad, S and Postlethwaite, S., Multivariable Feedback Control. Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1996.
4. Morari, M., Grimm, W., Oglesby, M. J. and Prosser, I. D., Design of resilient processing plants VII - design of energy management system for unstable reactors - new insights. Chemical Engineering Science, 1985, 40, 187-198.
5. Stanley, G., Marino-Galarraga, M. and McAvoy, T. J., Shortcut operability analysis. 1. The relative disturbance gain. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1985, 24, 1181-1188.
6. Hovd, M. and Skogestad, S., Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design. Automatica, 1992, 28(5), 989-996.
7. Skogestad, S. and Wolff, E. A. Controllability measures for disturbance rejection. In IFAC Workshop on Interactions between Process Design and Process Control, London, September 1992, Ed. J. D. Perkins, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 23-29.
8. Noble, B. and Daniel, J. W., Applied Linear Algebra. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.
9. Ben-Israel, A. and Greville, T. N. E., Generalized Inverse: Theory and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974.
10. Cline, R. E., Representations for the generalized inverse of a partitioned matrix. Journal of the SIAM, 1964, 12(3), 588-600.
11. Hovd, M. and Skogestad, S., Procedure for regulatory control structure selection with application to the FCC process. AIChE Journal, 1993, 39(12), 1938-1953.
12. Wolff, E., Studies on control of integrated plants. PhD thesis, University of Trondheim, the Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1994.
13. Douglas, J., Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
14. Aspen Technology, Inc., User Manual for SpeedUp Release 5.5-5. Aspen Technology Inc., Cambridge, UK, 1996.
15. Cao, Y. and Biss, D., New screening techniques for choosing manipulated variables. In Proceedings of IFAC'96 13th World Congress, Vol. M, pp. 103-108, San Francisco, CA, 1996.
16. Cao, Y. and Rossiter, D., An input pre-screening technique for control structure selection. Computers Chem. Engng., 1997, 21(6), 563-569.
17. Cao, Y., Rossiter, D. and Owens, D. H., Input selection for disturbance rejection under manipulated variable constraints. Computers Chem. Engng., 1997, 21, S403.
18. Cao, Y., Rossiter, D. and Owens, D. H., Screening criteria for input and output selection. In ECC97 CDROM, no. 773, Brussels, 1997.