Contingent valuation and social choice

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 689-708

  McFadden, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Existence value; Social choice; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955056303     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1243732     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bishop, R., and T. Heberlein. “Measuring the Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61 (December 1979):926-30.
2. Bowker, J., and J. Stoll. “Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70 (May 1988):372-81.
3. Cameron, T., and D. Huppert. “Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 (December 1991):910—18.
4. Cameron, T., and J. Englin. “Cost-Benefit Analysis for Non-Market Resources Under Individual Uncertainty.” U.C.L.A. Working Paper, 1992.
5. Cameron, T., and M. James. “Efficient Estimation Methods for Use with ‘Closed Ended’ Contingent Valuation Survey Data.” Rev. Econ. and Statist. 69 (May 1987):269-76.
6. Carson, R. “Constructed Markets.” J. Braden and C. Kolstad, eds. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, pp. 121-62. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991.
7. Cosslett, S. “Distribution-Free Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Binary Choice Model.” Econometrica 51 (May 1983):765-82.
8. Cummings, R., D. Brookshire, and W. Schultze. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Savage MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1986.
9. Diamond, P. and J. Hausman. “On Contingent Valuation Measurement of Nonuse Values.” J. Hausman, ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 3-38. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.
10. Diamond, P., J. Hausman, G. Leonard, and M. Denning. “Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence.” J. Hausman, ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 41-85. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.
11. Duffield, J., and D. Patterson. “Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” Land Econ. 67 (May 1991):225-39.
12. Hanemann, M. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ 66 (August 1984):332—41.
13. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73 (November 1991): 1255—63.
14. Hausman, J., G. Leonard, and D. McFadden. “The Value of Recreational Opportunities Lost Due to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” J. Hausman, ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 341-85. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.
15. Kahneman, D., and J. Knetsch. “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 22 (January 1992):57-70.
16. Kealy, M., M. Montgomery, and J. Davidio. “The Reliability and Predictive Validity of Contingent Values: Does the Nature of the Good Matter?” J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 19 (November 1990):244-63.
17. Loomis, J. “Comparative Reliability of the Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Techniques.” J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 18 (January 1990):78-85.
18. Loomis, J. “Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models.” Land Econ. 68 (May 1992):211-24.
19. McClelland, G., W. Schultze, J. Lazo, D. Waldman, J. Doyle, S. Elliott, and J. Irwin. Methods for Measuring Non-Use Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Groundwater Cleanup. University of Colorado Working Paper, 1992.
20. McConnell, K. “Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation.” J, Environ. Econ. and Manage. 18 (January 1990): 19-34.
21. McDaniels, T. “Reference Points, Loss Aversion, and Contingent Values for Auto Safety.” J. Risk and Uncertainty 5 (May 1992): 187-200.
22. McFadden, D. “Estimation of Social Value from Willingness-to-Pay Data.” J. Moore, ed. Essays in Honor of John Chipman, forthcoming (1994).
23. McFadden, D. “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research.” Mktg. Sci. 5 (Fall 1986):275-97.
24. McFadden, D., and G. Leonard. “Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis.” J. Hausman, ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 165-208. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.
25. Park, T., J. Loomis, and M. Creel. “Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies.” Land Econ. 67 (February 1991):64—73.
26. Rao, C.R. Linear Statistical Models. New York: Wiley, 1973.
27. Robertson, T., F. Wright, R. Dykstra. Order Restricted Statistical Inference. New York: Wiley, 1988.