What's new in mammography

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1998, Pages

  Simonetti, Giovanni ^a   Cossu, Elsa ^a   Montanaro, Martina ^a   Caschili, Cristiana ^a   Giuliani, Valentina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Mortality rate

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL COMPUTERS; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; LASER DIAGNOSTICS; ONCOLOGY; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION;

DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS; LASER MAMMOGRAPHY; SYNCHROTRON MAMMOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGENESIS; BREAST CANCER; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TELERADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0032078319     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00069-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology. 183:1992;629-630.
2. Karellas A., Harris L.J., D'Oris C.J. Small field digital mammography with a 2048×2048 pixel charged-coupled device. (Abstract). Radiology. 177:1990;288.
3. Rowlands J.A., Hunter D.M., Aroj N. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography. Med Phys. 18:1991;421-423.
4. Street R.A. Hydrogenated amorphous silicon. 1991;391 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Doi K., Giger M.L., Nishikawa R.M., Hoffmann K.R., MacMahon H., Schmidt R.A. Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digital Imaging. 8(Suppl 1):1995;2-7.
6. Giger ML. Computer-aided diagnosis. In: Haus AG, Yaffe MJ, editors. Syllabus: a categorical course in physics-technical aspects of breast imaging. Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America 1994:287-302.
7. Winsberg F., Elkin M., Macy J., Bordaz V., Weymouth W. Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology. 89:1967;211-215.
8. Thurfjell E.L., Lernevall K.A., Taube A.A.S. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. 191:1994;241-244.
9. Wu Y., Giger M.L., Doi K., Vyborny C.J., Schmidt R.A., Metz C.E. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 187:1993;81-87.
10. Niklason L.T., Christian B.T., Niklason L.E., Kopans D.B. et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. 205:1997;399-406.
11. Burattini V.B., Cossu E., Di Maggio C., Gambaccini M., Indovina P.L., Marziani M., Pocek M., Simeoni S., Simonetti G. Mammography with synchrotron radiation. Radiology. 195:1995;239-244.
12. Lewis R. Medical applications of synchrotron radiation X-rays. Phys Med Biol. 42:1997;1213-1243.