Size perception by vision and kinesthesia

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 705-718

  Seizova Cajić, Tatjana ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION;

EID: 0032067141     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206057     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AVERY, G. C., & DAY, R. H. (1969). Basis of horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 376-380.
2. BROWN, J. S., KNAUFT, E. B., & ROSENBAUM, G. (1948). The accuracy of positioning reactions as a function of their direction and extent. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 167-182.
3. CHENG, M. F. H. (1968). Tactile-kinesthetic perception of length. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 74-82.
4. CLARK, F. J., & HORCH, K. W. (1986). Kinaesthesia. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 13-1 to 13-62). New York: Wiley.
5. CONNOLLY, K., & JONES, B. (1970). A developmental study of afferent-reafferent integration. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 259-266.
6. COREN, S., & GIRGUS, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. New York: Erlbaum.
7. HATWELL, Y. (1990). Spatial perception by eyes and hand: Comparison and intermodal integration. In C. Bard, M. Fleury, & L. Hay (Eds.), Development of eye-hand coordination across the life span (pp. 99-132). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
8. JAMES, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
9. JASTROW, J. (1886). The perception of space by disparate modalities. Mind, 11, 539-554.
10. JONES, B. (1973). When are vision and kinaesthesis comparable? British Journal of Psychology, 64, 587-591.
11. KUENNEPAS, T. M. (1955). An analysis of the "horizontal-vertical illusion." Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 134-140.
12. LASZLO, J. I., BEGG, J. M., & SAINSBURY, K. M. (1994). The size illusion in children from five years of age and adults. Perception, 23, 201-206.
13. LASZLO, J. I., & BRODERICK, P. (1985). The size illusion: Visual and kinaesthetic information in size perception. Perception, 14, 285-291.
14. LOOMIS, J. M., & LEDERMAN, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 31-1 to 31-41). New York: Wiley.
15. MARKS, L. E. (1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York: Academic Press.
16. MICHAELS, C., & CARELLO, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. MILLAR, S. (1972). The development of visual and kinesthetic judgments of distance. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 271-282.
18. NEWELL, K. M., SHAPIRO, D. C., & CARLTON, M. J. (1979). Coordinating visual and kinesthetic memory codes. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 87-96.
19. ONO, A. (1969). Interdependence in successive judgements of the duration, distance and speed of a manual movement. Tohuku Psychologica Folia, 28, 29-53.
20. PAILLARD, J., & BROUCHON, M. A. (1974). A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. Brain Research, 71, 273-284.
21. RAFFEL, G. (1936). Visual and kinesthetic judgments of length. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 331-334.
22. RONCO, P. G. (1963). An experimental quantifications of kinesthetic sensation: Extent of arm movement. Journal of Psychology, 55, 227-238.
23. RULE, S. J. (1969). Subject difference in exponents from circle size, numerousness, and line length. Psychonomic Science, 15, 284-285.
24. SEIZOVA, T. (1995). Visual, tactual, kinesthetic and haptic size perception: Cross-modal matching (Report No. 17, pp. 1-28). Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology.
25. SEIZOVA, T., & STANKOV, L. (1998). Individual differences in cross-modal matching of length. Manuscript in preparation.
26. STEVENS, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
27. STEVENS, S. S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 78, 426-450.
28. STEVENS, S. S., & GUIRAO, M. (1963). Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 177-186.
29. TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1965). The judgment of size. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 392-402.
30. TEGHTSOONIAN, R. (1981). Logical difficulties in physical correlate theory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 205-206.
31. TEGHTSOONIAN, R., & TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1970). Two varieties of perceived length. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 389-392.
32. WELCH, R. B. (1986). Adaptation of space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 24-1 to 24-37). New York: Wiley.
33. WONG, T. S. (1977). Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion with an L figure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 151-164.
34. YILMAZ, H. (1967). Perceptual invariance and the psychophysical law. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 533-538.
35. ZELAZNIK, H. N., & LANTERO, D. (1996). The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing. Acta Psychologica, 92, 105-118.