Using landscape spatial relationships to improve estimates of land-cover area from coarse resolution remote sensing

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 202-220

  Moody, Aaron ^a  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ESTIMATION; LIGHT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTICS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

COARSE RESOLUTION; LAND-COVER AREA;

REMOTE SENSING;

CORRECTION; ESTIMATION METHOD; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MODEL; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 0032058202     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00003-0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams J., Smith M., Johnson P. Spectral mixture modeling. A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 site J. Geophys. Res. 91(B8):1986;8098-8112.
2. Avissar R. Conceptual aspects of a statistical-dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid-scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models. J. Geophys. Res. 97(D3):1992;2729-2742.
3. Baker W. L., Cai Y. The r.le programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landscape Ecol. 7(4):1992;291-302.
4. Borel C., Gerstl S. Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces. Remote Sens. Environ. 47:1994;403-416.
5. Brown P. Multivariate calibration. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 44:1982;287-321.
6. Czaplewski R., Catts G. Calibration of remotely sensed proportion or area estimates for misclassification error. Remote Sens. Environ. 39:1992;29-43.
7. Dickinson R. Land processes in climate models. Remote Sens. Environ. 51:1995;27-38.
8. Foley J. Net primary productivity in the terrestrial biosphere. the application of a global model J. Geophys. Res. 99(D10):1994;20,773-20,783.
9. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1996), Forest Resources Assessment 1990 - Survey of Tropical Forest Cover and Study of Change Processes. Forestry Paper No. 130, Rome, 154 pp.
10. Henderson-Sellers A., Wilson M., Thomas G. The effect of spatial resolution on archives of land cover type. Clim. Change. 7:1985;391-402.
11. Huete A. Separation of soil-plant mixtures by factor analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 19:1986;237-251.
12. Jupp D. L. B. The stability of global estimates from confusion matrices. Int. J. Remote Sens. 10:1989;1563-1569.
13. Kalkhan, M., Reich, R., and Czaplewski, R. (1995), Evaluation of statistical properties of the inverse estimator for remotely sense areal estimates using simple random sampling. In Proc. Am. Soc. Photogramm. and Remote Sensing Conf., 27 Feb.-2 Mar., Charlotte, NC, Vol. 3, pp. 258-270.
14. Koster R., Suarez M. Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J. Geophys. Res. 97(D3):1992;2697-2715.
15. Mayaux P., Lambin E. Estimation of tropical forest area from coarse spatial resolution data. a two step correction function for proportional errors Remote Sens. Environ. 53:1995;1-16.
16. Moody A., Strahler A. H. Characteristics of composited AVHRR data and problems in their classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 15(17):1994;3473-3491.
17. Moody A., Woodcock C. E. Scale-dependent errors in the estimation of land-cover proportions - implications for global land-cover datasets. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 60(5):1994;585-594.
18. Moody A., Woodcock C. E. The influence of scale and the spatial characteristics of landscapes on land-cover mapping using remote sensing. Landscape Ecol. 10(6):1995;363-379.
19. Moody A., Woodcock C. E. Calibration-based models for correction of area estimates derived from coarse resolution land-cover data. Remote Sens. Environ. 58:1996;225-241.
20. Oleson K., Sarlin S., Garrison J., Smith S., Privette J., Emery W. Unmixing multiple land-cover type reflectances from coarse spatial resolution satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 54:1995;98-112.
21. Pax-Lenney M., Woodcock C. E. The effect of spatial resolution on the ability to monitor the status of agricultural lands. Remote Sens. Environ. 61:1996;210-220.
22. Puyou-Lascassies P., Flouzat G., Gay M., Vignolles C. Validation of the use of multiple linear regression as a tool for unmixing coarse spatial resolution images. Remote Sens. Environ. 49:1994;155-166.
23. Quarmby N., Townshend J., Settle J., White K. Linear mixture modeling applied to AVHRR data for crop area estimation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 13:1992;415-425.
24. Roberts D., Smith M., Adams J. Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 44:1993;222-269.
25. Roesch F., Van Deusen P., Zhu Z. A comparison of various estimators for updating forest area coverage using AVHRR and forest inventory data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 61(3):1995;307-311.
26. Running S., Justice C., Hall D.et al. Terrestrial remote sensing science and algorithms planned for EOS/MODIS. Int. J. Remote Sens. 15:1994;3587-3620.
27. Sellers P., Mintz Y., Sud Y., Dalcher A. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 43(6):1986;505-531.
28. Seth A., Giorgio F., Dickinson R. Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces. explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) J. Geophys. Res. 99(D9):1994;18,651-18,667.
29. Starmer W. J., Frohn R. C. The effects of changing spatial resolution and spatial pattern on IGBP land-cover classes in the Washington, D.C. Area. In. Proc. Am. Soc. Photogramm. and Remote Sens. Conf. 1996;ndash;25 April, Baltimore, MD. Vol. 1, pp. 169-178.
30. Strahler, A., Moody, A., Lambin, E., et al. (1995), MODIS land cover product: algorithm technical basis document, NASA Document for MODIS Product No. 11, Parameter Nos. 2669 and 2671, NASA, Greenbelt, MD.
31. Townshend J., Justice C., Li W., Gurney C., McManus J. Global land cover classification by remote sensing. present capabilities and future possibilities Remote Sens. Environ. 35:1991;243-255.
32. Turner M., O'Neill R., Gardner R., Milne B. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3(3/4):1989;153-162.
33. Vitousek P. Beyond global warming. ecology and global change Ecology. 75(7):1994;1861-1876.
34. Walsh T., Burk T. Calibration of satellite classifications of land area. Remote Sens. Environ. 46:1993;281-290.
35. Woodcock, C. E., and Gopal, S. (1992), Accuracy assessment of the Stanislaus Forest vegetation map using fuzzy sets. In Proc. Fourth Biennial Remote Sens. Appl. Conf., Orlando, FL, April, pp. 378-394.
36. Woodcock, C. E., Gopal, S., Macomber, S. A., and Jakabhazy, V. D. (1994), Accuracy assessment of the vegetation map of the Plumas National Forest, Technical Report, Center for Remote Sensing, Boston University, Boston, MA, 19 pp.
37. Yuan D. Natural constraints for inverse area estimate corrections. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 62(4):1996;413-417.