Natural constraints for inverse area estimate corrections

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 413-417

  Yuan, Ding ^a  

^a DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; INVERSE METHOD; MARGINAL AREA ESTIMATION;

EID: 0029731250     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bauer, M.E., M.M. Hixson, B.J. Davis, and J.B. Etheridge, 1978. Area estimation of crops by analysis of Landsat data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote, Sensing, 44:1033-1043.
2. Burk, T.E., M.E. Bauer, A.R. Ek, and S.C. Ahearn, 1988. Satellite inventory of Minnesota's forest resource, Proceedings of the IUFRO S4.02.05 Meeting, Hyytiala, Finland, 29 August-2 September, pp. 43-52.
3. Card, D.H., 1982. Using known map categorical marginal frequencies to improve estimate of thematic map accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 48:431-439.
4. Chrisman, N.R., 1982. Beyond accuracy assessment: correction of misclassification, Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography, Crystal City, Virginia, 22-28 August, pp.123-132.
5. Czaplewski, R.L., 1992. Misclassification bias in areal estimates, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58:189-192.
6. Czaplewski, R.L., and G.P. Catts, 1990. Calibrating area estimates for classification error using confusion matrices, Proceedings ACSM/ASPRS Convention, Denver, Colorado, 4:431-440.
7. _, 1992. Calibration of remotely sensed proportion or area estimates for misclassification error, Remote Sensing of Environment, 39:29-43.
8. Dymond, J.R., 1992. How accurately do image classifiers estimate area? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:1735-1742.
9. Golub, G.H., and C.F.V. Loan, 1989. Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 79-81, p. 120.
10. Hay, A.M., 1988. The derivation of global estimates from a confusion matrix, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9:1395-1398.
11. _, 1989. Global estimates from a confusion matrix; a reply to Jupp, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10:1571-1573.
12. Horn, R.A., and C.R. Johnson, 1985. Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 349, p. 295.
13. Jupp, D.L.B., 1989. The stability of global estimates from confusion matrices, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10:1563-1569.
14. Maselli, F., C. Conese, G. Zipoli, and M.A. Pittau, 1990. Use of error probabilities to improve area estimate based on maximum likelihood classifications, Remote Sensing of Environment, 31:155-160.
15. Maxim, L.D., L. Harrington, and M. Kennedy, 1981. Alternative "scale-up" estimates for aerial survey where both detection and classification errors exist, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 47:1227-1239.
16. Mine, H., 1986. Nonnegative Matrices, John Willey & Sons, New York, 146 p.
17. Poso, S., 1988. Seeking for an optimal path for using satellite imageries for forest inventory and monitoring, Proceedings of IUFRO S4.02.05 Meeting, Hyytiala, Finland, 29 August-2 September.
18. Prisley, S.P., and J.L. Smith, 1987. Using classification error matrices to improve the accuracy of weighted land-cover models, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 53:1259-1263.
19. Thomas, R.W., 1986. Utility of remote sensing data in renewable resource sample survey, Proceedings of the 1986 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Zurich, 8-11 September, pp. 755-758.