Enhancing the proline effect: Pseudo-prolines for tailoring Cis/ trans isomerization

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 120, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 2714-2720

  Keller, Michael ^a   Sager, Cédric ^a   Dumy, Pascal ^a   Schutkowski, Mike ^b   Fischer, Gunter S ^b   Mutter, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK RESEARCH UNIT FOR ENZYMOLOGY OF PROTEIN FOLDING   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROLINE;

AMINO ACID METABOLISM; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ISOMERISM; NONHUMAN; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032054074     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja973966s     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Flippen-Anderson, J. L.; Gilardi, R.; Karle, I. L.; Frey, M. H.; Opella, S. J.; Gierasch, L.; Goodman, M.; Madison V.; Delaney, N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6609-6615.
2. Toniolo, C. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1990, 35, 287-300.
3. Marshall, G. R. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 3547-3558.
4. (a) Balaram, P. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1992, 2, 845-851.
5. (b) Giannis A.; Kolter, T. Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1303-1326.
6. (c) Burgess, K.; Ho, K.-K.; Pal, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3803-3819.
7. Schmid., F. X.; Mayr, L. M.; Mücke, M.; Schönbrunner, E. R. Adv. Prot. Chem. 1993, Vol.44, 25-66.
8. Mikhailov, D.; Daragan, V. A.; Mayo K. H. Biophysical J. 1995, 68(4), 1540-1550.
9. Wüthrich, K.; Billeter, M.; Braun, W. J. Mol. Biol. 1984, 180, 715-740.
10. Nail, B. T. In Protein Refolding; Gierasch, L. M., King, J., Eds.; AAAS Press: Washington, DC, 1990; pp 198-207.
11. Wöhr T.; Wahl F.; Nefzi, A.; Rohwedder, B.; Sato, T.; Sun, X.; Mutter, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9218-9227.
12. Dumy, P.; Keller, M.; Ryan, D. E.; Rohwedder, B.; Wöhr, T.; Mutter M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 918-925.
13. (a) Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 935-967.
14. (b) Macura, S.; Farmer, B. T.; Brown, L. R. J. Magn. Reson. 1986, 70, 493-499.
15. Fischer, G.; Bang, H.; Mech, C. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 1984, 43, 1101.
16. Berger, A.; Schechter, I. Philos. Trans R. Soc. 1970, B257, 249.
17. Fischer, G. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1415-1436.
18. Wöhr, T.; Mutter, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3847-3848.
19. Activation of Fmoc-Val-OH with cyanuric fluoride (10 equiv) in the presence of pyridine (1 equiv) in DCM for 2 h under reflux. Filtration of the precipitate and removing of solvent gave Fmoc-Val-F quantilatively.
20. Drobny, G.; Pines, A.; Sinton, S.; Wertekamp, D.; Wemmer, D. Faraday Div. Chem. Soc. Symp. 1979, 13, 48-58.
21. Piantini, V.; Sørensen, O. W.; Ernst, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6800-6801.
22. Jeener, J.; Meier, B. H.; Bachmann, P.; Ernst, R. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 4546-4553.
23. Bothner-By, A. A.; Stephen, R. R.-L.; Lee, J., Warren, C. D.; Jeanloz, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 811-813.
24. Biosym Technologies Inc., San Diego.
25. Integration of Cα protons affords the same cis content. Due to signal overlap in some cases, the NH-pNA was chosen for all compounds to determine their cis/trans ratios.
26. Kofron, J. L.; Kuzmic, P.; Kishore, V.; Colon-Bonilla, E.; Rich, D. H. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 6127-6134.
27. -1.
28. Stein, R. L. Adv. Protein Chem. 1993, 44, 1.
29. 1H NMR was observed.
30. (a) Nachtergaele, W. Y. Anteunis, J. O. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1980, 89, 9, 749-758.
31. (b) Toppet, S.; Claes, P.; Hoogmartens, J. Org. Magn. Reson. 1974, 6, 48-52.
32. (c) Benedetti, F.; Ferrario, F.; Sala, A.; Soresinetti, P. R. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1994, 31, 1343-1347.
33. (a) Radzicka, A.; Acheson, S. A.; Wolfenden, R. Bioorg. Chem. 1992, 20, 382.
34. (b) Eberhardt, E. S.; Loh, S. N.; Hinck, A. P.; Taines, R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5437.
35. (a) La Planche, L. A.; Rogers, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 337.
36. (b) Madison, V.; Kopple, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4855.
37. (c) Ke, H.; Mayrose, D.; Cao, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 3324-3328.
38. The cis/trans ratios of all compounds were determined by the integration of the 2-C protons which for each of the cis and the trans form give separate singlet-signals at around 6.1 and 6.2 ppm, respectively.
39. 1H NMR spectrum in DMSO shows one predominant conformation. For certain protons such as the NH-pNA proton, traces of another conformation can be detected. However, due to a relative intensity of less than 3% with respect to the major conformation, an unambiguous assignment is impossible. It was yet detected by the CT coupled assay that very few percent of the trans form exist depending on temperature and solvent.
40. Beausoleil, E.; Lubell, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12902-12908.
41. Magaard, V. W.; Sanchez R. M.; Bean, J. W.; Moore M. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, Vol. 34, No. 3, 381-384.
42. Kern, D.; Schutkowski, M.; Drakenberg, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8403-8408.
43. Nefzi, A.; Schenk, K.; Mutter, M. Protein Pept. Lett. 1994, 1, 66-69.
44. Albers, M. W.; Walsh, C. T.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, No. 17, 4984-4986.
45. Fischer, S.; Dunbrack, R. L. Jr.; Karplus, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11931-11937.
46. Sandström, J. Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy; Academic Press: 1982; pp 108-109.