Investigating Single-Word Syntactic Primes in Naming Tasks: A Recurrent Network Approach

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 648-663

  Farrar IV, William T ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0032041951     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.648     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 252-259.
2. Carello, C., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition, 16, 187-195.
3. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
4. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1989). Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2, 191-211.
5. Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
6. Farrar, W. T., IV, & Van Orden, G. C. (1994, November). Simulating the regularization errors and semantic errors of acquired dyslexia in an interdependent network: When PINT rhymes with MINT and a BUSH is a TREE. Poster session presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
7. Farrar, W. T., IV, & Van Orden, G. C. (1996). Simulating the qualitative pattern of normal naming and the characteristic errors of acquired dyslexia in a recurrent network. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth.: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
10. Fukuda, K. (1990). Effects of syntactic structure of a sentence in word naming. Psychologia, 33, 42-49.
11. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Goodman, G. O., McClelland, J. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 580-586.
13. Goschke, T., & Koppelberg, D. (1990). Connectionist representation, semantic compositionality, and the instability of concept structure. Psychological Research, 52, 253-270.
14. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Savic, M., & Turvey, M. T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 692-701.
15. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Moskovijevic, J., Savic, M., & Turvey, M. T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition, 9, 55-71.
16. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
17. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 697-715.
18. Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). The relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in shallow and deep orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 157-166.
19. Kawamoto, A. H. (1988). Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. In S. I. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 195-228). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
20. Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
21. Kawamoto, A. H., Farrar, W. T., & Kello, C. T. (1994). When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1233-1247.
22. Kawamoto, A. H., & Zemblidge, J. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
23. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Lukatela, G., Moraca, J., Stojnov, D., Savic, M., Katz, L., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). Grammatical priming effects between pronouns and inflected verb forms. Psychological Research, 44, 297-311.
26. MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157-201.
27. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 4, 676-703.
28. MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
30. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1155-1172.
31. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
33. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
34. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408.
35. Ritter, H. (1990). Self-organizing maps for internal representations. Psychological Review, 52, 128-136.
36. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
37. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
38. Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 459-477.
39. Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227-267.
40. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 337-359.
41. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1989). Are words represented by nodes? Memory & Cognition, 17, 511-524.
42. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
43. Tanenhaus, M. K., Dell, G. S., & Carlson, G. (1987). Context effects and lexical processing: A connectionist approach to modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
45. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
46. Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 237, 5-72.
47. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
48. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
49. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
50. Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Pfeifer, R. (1992). Categorizations, representations, and the dynamics of systems-environment interaction: A case study in autonomous systems. In J. A. Meyer, H. L. Roitblatt, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animats 2: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulations of Adapative Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing. Memory & Cognition, 14, 104-112.