Nuclear matrix attachment regions and plant gene expression

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 91-97

  Holmes Davis, Rachel ^a   Comai, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032031347     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01198-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. 1 Moreno Diaz de la Espina, S. (1995) Nuclear matrix isolated from plant cells, in Structural and Functional Organization of the Nuclear Matrix (Berezney, R. and Kwang, W.J., eds), pp. 75-139, Academic Press
2. 2 Nickerson, J.A. et al. (1997) The nuclear matrix revealed by eluting chromatin from a cross-linked nucleus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4446-4450
3. 3 Jackson, D.A. and Cook, P.R. (1995) The structural basis of nuclear function, in Structural and Functional Organization of the Nuclear Matrix (Berezney, R. and Kwang, W.J., eds), pp. 125-149, Academic Press
4. 4 Singer, R.H. and Green, M.R. (1997) Compartmentalization of eukaryotic gene expression: causes and effects, Cell 91, 291-294
5. 5 Mattern, K.A. et al. (1997) Major internal nuclear matrix proteins are common to different human cell types, J. Cell. Biochem. 65, 42-52
6. 6 Luderus, M.E.E. and van Driel, R. (1997) Nuclear matrix-associated regions, in Nuclear Organization, Chromatin Structure, and Gene Expression (van Driel, R. and Otte, A.P., eds), pp. 99-115, Oxford University Press
7. 7 Heck, M.M.S. (1997) Condensins, cohesins, and chromosome architecture: how to make and break a mitotic chromosome, Cell 91, 5-8
8. 8 Benyajati, C. and Worcel, A. (1976) Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster, Cell 9, 393-407
9. 9 Paulson, J.R. and Laemmli, U.K. (1997) The structure of histone depleted metaphase chromosomes, Cell 12, 817-828
10. 10 Strissel, P.L. et al. (1996) Scaffold attachment regions in centromere-associated DNA, Chromosoma 105, 122-133
11. 11 Mielke, C. et al. (1990) Hierarchical binding of DNA fragments derived from scaffold-attached regions: correlation of properties in vitro and function in vivo, Biochemistry 29, 7475-7485
12. 12 Slatter, R.E., Dupree, P. and Gray, J.C. (1991) A scaffold-associated DNA region is located downstream of the pea plastocyanin gene, Plant Cell 3, 1239-1250
13. 13 Hall, G., Jr et al. (1991) Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 9320-9324
14. 14 Breyne, P. et al. (1992) Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco, Plant Cell 4, 463-471
15. 15 Avramova, Z. and Bennetzen, J.L. (1993) Isolation of matrices from maize leaf nuclei: identification of a matrix-binding site adjacent to the Adh1 gene, Plant Mol. Biol. 22, 1135-1143
16. 16 Schöffl, F. et al. (1993) An SAR sequence containing 395 bp DNA fragment mediates enhanced, gene-dosage-correlated expression of a chimaeric heat shock gene in transgenic tobacco plants, Transgenic Res. 2, 93-100
17. 17 Dietz, A. et al. (1994) A plant scaffold attached region detected close to a T-DNA integration site is active in mammalian cells, Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2744-2751
18. 18 van der Geest, A.H.M. et al. (1994) The β-phaseolin gene is flanked by matrix attachment regions, Plant J. 6, 413-423
19. 19 Galliano, H. et al. (1995) The transformation booster sequence from Petunia hybrida is a retrotransposon derivative that binds to the nuclear scaffold, Mol. Gen. Genet. 247, 614-622
20. 20 Chinn, A.M. and Comai, L. (1996) The Heat Shock Cognate 80 gene of tomato is flanked by matrix attachment regions, Plant Mol. Biol. 32, 959-968
21. 21 Meier, I. et al. (1997) The tomato RBCS3A promoter requires integration into the chromatin for correct organ-specific regulation, FEBS Lett. 415, 91-95
22. 22 van Drunen, C.M. et al. (1997) Analysis of the chromatin domain organisation around the plastocyanin gene reveals an MAR-specific sequence element in Arabidopsis thaliana, Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3904-3911
23. 23 Nomura, K. et al. (1997) Isolation and characterization of matrix associated region DNA fragments in rice (Oryza sativa L.), Plant Cell Physiol. 38, 1060-1068
24. 24 Avramova, Z. et al. (1995) Matrix attachment regions and transcribed sequences within a long chromosomal continuum containing maize Adh1, Plant Cell 7, 1667-1680
25. 25 Paul, A-L. and Ferl, R.J. (1993) Osmium tetroxide footprinting of a scaffold attachment region in the maize Adh1 promoter, Plant Mol. Biol. 22, 1145-1151
26. 26 Bode, J. et al. (1996) Scaffold/matrix-attached regions: topological switches with multiple regulatory functions, Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expr. 6, 115-138
27. 27 Dickinson, L.A., Dickinson, C.D. and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. (1997) An atypical homeodomain in SATB1 promotes specific recognition of the key structural element in a matrix attachment region, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11463-11470
28. 28 Geyer, P.K. (1997) The role of insulator elements in defining domains of gene expression, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 242-248
29. 29 Mirkovitch, J., Mirault, M-E. and Laemmli, U.K. (1984) Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold, Cell 39, 223-232
30. 30 Bodnar, J.W. and Bradley, M.K. (1996) A chromatin switch, J. Theor. Biol. 183, 1-7
31. 31 Dijkwel, P.A. and Hamlin, J.L. (1995) Origins of replication and the nuclear matrix: the DHFR domain as a paradigm, in Structural and Functional Organization of the Nuclear Matrix (Berezney, R. and Kwang, W.J., eds), pp. 455-484, Academic Press
32. 32 Amati, B. et al. (1990) Nuclear scaffold attachment stimulates, but is not essential for ARS activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the Drosophila ftz SAR, EMBO J. 9, 4007-4016
33. 33 Strick, R. and Laemmli, U.K. (1995) SARs are cis DNA elements of chromosome dynamics: synthesis of a SAR repressor protein, Cell 83, 1137-1148
34. 34 Allen, G.C. et al. (1993) Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells, Plant Cell 5, 603-613
35. 35 Allen, G.C. et al. (1996) High-level transgene expression in plant cells: effects of a strong scaffold attachment region from tobacco, Plant Cell 8, 899-913
36. 36 Chinn, A.M., Payne, S.R. and Comai, L. (1996) Variegation and silencing of the Heat Shock Cognate 80 gene are relieved by a bipartite downstream regulatory element, Plant J. 9, 325-339
37. 37 Mlynárová, L. et al. (1994) Reduced position effect in mature transgenic plants conferred by the chicken lysozyme matrix-associated region, Plant Cell 6, 417-426
38. 38 Meyer, P. and Saedler, H. (1996) Homology-dependent gene silencing in plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 23-48
39. 39 Koncz, C. et al. (1989) High-frequency T-DNA-mediated gene tagging in plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8467-8471
40. 40 Mlynárová, L. et al. (1995) The MAR-mediated reduction in position effect can be uncoupled from copy number-dependent expression in transgenic plants, Plant Cell 7, 599-609
41. 41 van der Geest, A.H.M. and Hall, T.C. 5′ matrix attachment region acts as an enhancer Mol. Biol. 33, 553-557
42. 42 von Kries, J.P. et al. (1990) A non-curved lysozyme 5′ matrix attachment site is 3′ followed by a strongly curved EDNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3881-3885
43. 43 Festenstein, R. et al. (1996) Locus control region function and heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation. Science 271, 1123-1125
44. 44 Luehrsen, K.R. and Walbot, V. (1994) Intron creation and polyadenylation in maize are directed by AU-rich RNA, Genes Dev. 8, 1117-1130