Ocular irritation: Pathological changes occurring in the rat with surfactants of unknown irritancy

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 226-233

  Maurer, James K ^a   Parker, Ronald D ^a   Carr, Gregory J ^a  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjunctiva; Cornea; Eye testing; Histopathology; Pathobiology; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC SURFACTANT; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; CATIONIC SURFACTANT; IRRITANT AGENT; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; NONIONIC SURFACTANT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; EDEMA; EYE IRRITATION; EYELID; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031980740     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019262339802600206     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bailer AJ (1988). Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 16: 303-309.
2. Bruner LH (1992). Ocular irritation. In: In Vitro Toxicity Testing. Applications to Safety Evaluation, JM Frazier (ed). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 149-190.
3. Daston GP and Freeberg FE (1991). Ocular irritation testing. In: Dermal and Ocular Toxicology. Fundamentals and Methods, DW Hobson (ed). CRC Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 509-540.
4. Draize JH, Woodard G, and Calvery HO (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82: 377-390.
5. Freeberg FE, Nixon GA, Reer PJ, Weaver JE, Bruce RD, Griffith JF, and Sanders LW III (1986). Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 7: 626-634.
6. Green S (1992). In vitro test validation and regulatory animal testing: A house built on sand versus a house of cards? ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim. 20: 567-570.
7. Green S, Chambers WA, Gupta KC, Hill RN, Hurley PM, Lambert LA, Lee CC, Lee JK, Liu PT, Lowther DK, Roberts CD, Seabaugh VM, Springer JA, and Wilcox NL (1993). Criteria for in vitro alternatives for the eye irritation test. Food Chem. Toxicol. 31: 81-85.
8. Heywood R and James RW (1978). Towards objectivity in the assessment of eye irritation. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 29: 25-29.
9. Jester JV, Maurer JK, Petroll WM, Wilkie DA, Parker RD, and Cavanagh HD (1996). Application of in vivo confocal microscopy to the understanding of surfactant-induced ocular irritation. Toxicol. Pathol. 24: 412-428.
10. Marzulli FN and Simon ME (1971). Eye irritation from topically applied drugs and cosmetics: Preclinical studies. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 48: 61-79.
11. Maurer JK, Li HF, Petroll WM, Parker RD, Cavanagh HD, and Jester JV (1997). Confocal microscopic characterization of initial corneal changes of surfactant-induced eye irritation in the rabbit. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 143: 291-300.
12. Maurer JK and Parker RD (1996). Light microscopic comparison of surfactant-induced eye irritation in rabbits and rats at 3 hours and recovery/day 35. Toxicol. Pathol. 24: 403-411.
13. Maurer JK, Parker RD, and Carr GJ (1998). Ocular irritation: Microscopic changes occurring over time in the rat with surfactants of known irritancy. Toxicol. Pathol. 26: 217-225.
14. US Department of Health and Human Services (1985). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animal Resources Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD.
15. Weil CS and Scala RA (1971). Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 19: 276-360.
16. Williams SJ, Graepel GJ, and Kennedy GL (1982). Evaluation of ocular irritancy potential: Intralaboratory variability and effect of dosage volume. Toxicol. Lett. 12: 235-241.