Postovulatory ageing of mouse oocytes in vivo and premature centromere separation and aneuploidy

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1206-1210

  Mailhes, John B ^a   Young, Daniel ^a   London, S N ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL AGING; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OVULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZYGOTE;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CYTOGENETICS; FEMALE; METAPHASE; MICE; MICE, INBRED ICR; OOCYTES; OVULATION; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031969335     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod58.5.1206     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hafez ESE. Reproduction in Farm Animals, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993: 144-164.
2. Marston JH, Chang MC. The fertilizable life of ova and their morphology following delayed insemination in mature and immature mice. J Exp Zool 1964; 155:237-252.
3. Edwards RF, Gates AH. Timing of the stages of the maturation divisions, ovulation, fertilization and the first cleavage of eggs of adult mice treated with gonadotrophins. J Endocrinol 1959; 18:292-304.
4. Juberg RC. Origin of chromosomal abnormalities: evidence for delayed fertilization in meiotic nondisjunction. Hum Genet 1983; 64: 122-127.
5. Blazak WF. Incidence of aneuploidy in farm animals. In: Vig BK, Sandberg AA (eds.), Aneuploidy, Part A: Incidence and Etiology. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.; 1987: 103-116.
6. Hecht F, Hecht BK. Aneuploidy in humans: dimensions, demography, and dangers of abnormal numbers of chromosomes. In: Vig BK, Sandberg AA (eds.), Aneuploidy, Part A: Incidence and Etiology. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.; 1987: 9-49.
7. Mailhes JB. Incidence of aneuploidy in rodents. In: Vig BK, Sandberg AA (eds.), Aneuploidy, Part A: Incidence and Etiology. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.; 1987: 67-101.
8. Pellestor F. Frequency and distribution of aneuploidy in human female gametes. Hum Genet 1991; 86:283-288.
9. Zenzes MT, Casper RF. Cytogenetics of human oocytes, zygotes, and embryos after in vitro fertilization. Hum Genet 1992; 88:367-375.
10. Szollosi D. Mammalian eggs ageing in the fallopian tubes. In: Blandeau RJ (ed.), Ageing Gametes. Basel: Karger; 1975: 98-121.
11. Sakai N, Endo A. Effects of delayed mating on preimplantation embryos in spontaneously ovulated mice. Gamete Res 1988; 19:381-385.
12. Smith AL, Lodge JR. Interactions of aged gametes: in vitro fertilization using in vitro-aged sperm and in vivo-aged ova in the mouse. Gamete Res 1987; 16:47-56.
13. O'Neill GT, Kaufman MH. Influence of postovulatory aging on chromosome segregation during the second meiotic division in mouse oocytes: a parthenogenetic analysis. J Exp Zool 1988; 248:125-131.
14. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Chandley AC, Gosden RG. Alterations to the microtubular cytoskeleton and increased disorder of chromosome alignment in spontaneously ovulated mouse oocytes in vivo: an immunofluorescence study. Chromosoma 1986; 94:337-345.
15. Webb M, Howlett SK, Maro B. Parthenogenesis and cytoskeleton organization in aging mouse eggs. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986; 95: 131-145.
16. Kim NH, Moon SJ, Prather RS, Day BN. Cytoskeletal alteration in aged porcine oocytes and parthenogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 43: 513-518.
17. Rodman TC. Chromatid disjunction in unfertilized ageing oocytes. Nature 1971; 233:191-193.
18. Spielmann H, Krüger C, Stauber M, Vogel R. Abnormal chromosome behavior in human oocytes which remained unfertilized during human in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1985; 2:138-142.
19. Dailey T, Dale B, Cohen J, Munné S. Association between nondisjunction and maternal age in meiosis-II oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59:176-184.
20. Lim AST, Tsakok MFH. Age-related decline in fertility: a link to degenerative oocytes? Fertil Steril 1997; 68:265-271.
21. Angell RR. Aneuploidy in older women; higher rates of aneuploidy in oocytes from older women. Hum Reprod 1994; 9:1199-1201.
22. Mailhes JB, Young D, London SN. 1,2-Propanediol-induced premature centromere separation in mouse oocytes and aneuploidy in one-cell zygotes. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:92-98.
23. Davis B. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 1971; 113:251-272.
24. Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Birnby D, Orr-Weaver TL. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 1992; 130:827-841.
25. Miyazaki WY, Orr-Weaver TL. Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants. Genetics 1992; 132:1047-1061.
26. Donahue RP. Fertilization of the mouse oocyte: sequence and timing of nuclear progression to the two-cell stage. J Exp Zool 1972; 180: 305-318.
27. Polanski Z. In vivo and in vitro maturation rate of oocytes from two strains of mice. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 78:103-109.
28. Tiveron C, Marchetti F, Bassani B, Pacchierotti F. Griseofulvin-induced aneuploidy and meiotic delay in female mouse germ cells. I. Cytogenetic analysis of metaphase II oocytes. Mutat Res 1992; 266: 143-150.
29. Marchetti F, Mailhes JB. Variation of mouse oocyte sensitivity to griseofulvin-induced aneuploidy and meiotic delay during the first meiotic division. Environ Mol Mutagen 1994; 23:179-185.
30. Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci 1991; 100: 289-298.
31. Mailhes JB, Marchetti F. The influence of postovulatory ageing on the retardation of mouse oocyte maturation and chromosome segregation induced by vinblastine. Mutagenesis 1994; 9:541-545.
32. Mailhes JB, Yuan ZP. Cytogenetic technique for mouse metaphase II oocytes. Gamete Res 1987; 18:77-83.
33. Salamanca F, Armendares S. C bands in human metaphase chromosomes treated by barium hydroxide. Ann Genet 1974; 17:135-136.
34. Minn AJ, Boise LH, Thompson CB. Expression of Bcl-X and loss of p53 can cooperate to overcome a cell cycle checkpoint induced by mitotic spindle damage. Genes Dev 1996; 10:2621-2631.
35. Xu Z, Abbott A, Kopf GS, Schultz RM, Ducibella T. Spontaneous activation of ovulated mouse eggs: time-dependent effects on M-phase exit, cortical granule exocytosis, maternal messenger ribonucleic acid recruitment, and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate sensitivity. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:743-750.
36. Racowsky C. Somatic control of meiotic status in mammalian oocytes. In: Haseltine FP, Heyner S (eds.), Meiosis II, Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Meiosis. Washington, DC: Amer Assoc Adv Science Press; 1993: 107-116.
37. cdc2 and cyclin B in mouse oocytes during acquisition of competence to resume meiosis. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40:503-508.
38. Taylor SS, McKeon F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 1997; 89:727-735.
39. Bicknell SE, Orr-Weaver TL. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays 1996; 18:293-300.
40. Mackay AM, Eckley DM, Chue C, Earnshaw WC. Molecular analysis of the INCENPs (inner centromere proteins): separate domains are required for association with microtubules during interphase and with the central spindle during anaphase. J Cell Biol 1993; 123:373-385.
41. Nasmyth K. Viewpoint: putting the cell cycle in order. Science 1996; 274:1643-1645.
42. Yanagida M. Frontier questions about sister chromatid separation in anaphase. Bioessays 1995; 17:519-526.