1,2-Propanediol-induced premature centromere separation in mouse oocytes and aneuploidy in one-cell zygotes

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 92-98

  Mailhes, John B ^a,b   Young, Daniel ^a   London, Steve N ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPYLENE GLYCOL;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CYTOGENETICS; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZYGOTE;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED ICR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OOCYTES; PREGNANCY; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; PROPYLENE GLYCOLS; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0030957306     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod57.1.92     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Hecht F, Hecht K. Aneuploidy in humans: dimensions, demography, and dangers of abnormal numbers of chromosomes. In: Vig BK, Sandberg AA (eds.), Aneuploidy, Part A: Incidence and Etiology. New York: Liss; 1987: 9-49.
2. Bond DJ, Chandley AC. Aneuploidy, Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics, No. 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983: 198.
3. Hansmann I. Factors and mechanisms involved in nondisjunction and X-chromosome loss. In: Sandberg AA (ed.), Cytogenetics of the Mammalian X Chromosome, Part A: Progress and Topics in Cytogenetics, Vol. 3A. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1983: 131-170.
4. Hook EB. The impact of aneuploidy upon public health: mortality and morbidity associated with human chromosome abnormalities. In: Dellarco VL, Voytek PE, Hollaender A (eds.), Aneuploidy: Etiology and Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1985: 7-33.
5. Mailhes JB. Important biological variables that can influence the degree of chemical-induced aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes and zygotes. Mutat Res 1995; 339:155-176.
6. Mailhes JB, Marchetti F. Chemically-induced aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes. Mutat Res 1994; 320:87-111.
7. Mailhes JB, Yuan ZP, Aardema MJ. Cytogenetic analysis of mouse oocytes and one-cell zygotes as a potential assay for heritable germ cell aneuploidy. Mutat Res 1990; 242:89-100.
8. Hassold T, Jacobs PA. Trisomy in man. Annu Rev Genet 1984; 18: 69-97.
9. Hassold T, Sherman S. The origin of non-disjunction in humans. In: Sumner AT, Chandley AC (eds.), Chromosomes Today. London: Chapman and Hall; 1993: 313-322.
10. Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Studies on maternal age-related aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes and cell cycle control. In: Sumner AT, Chandley AC (eds.), Chromosomes Today, Vol. 11. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993: 323-336.
11. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Boll I. Nocodazole sensitivity, age-related aneuploidy, and alterations in the cell cycle during maturation of mouse oocytes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989; 52:170-176.
12. Hansmann I, Pabst B. Nondisjunction by failures in the molecular control of oocyte maturation. Ann Anat 1992; 174:485-490.
13. Mailhes JB, Marchetti F. The influence of postovulatory ageing on the retardation of mouse oocyte maturation and chromosome segregation induced by vinblastine. Mutagenesis 1994; 9:541-545.
14. Joly C, Bchini O, Boulekbache H, Testart J, Maro B. Effects of 1,2-propanediol on the cytoskeletal organization of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:374-378.
15. Vincent C, Garnier V, Heyman Y, Renard J. Solvent effects on cytoskeletal organization and in vivo survival after freezing of rabbit oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1989 87:809-820.
16. Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WH. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum Reprod 1993; 8:1101-1109.
17. Van der Elst J, Van den Abbeel E, Jacobs R, Wisse E, Van Steirteghem A. Effect of 1,2-propanediol and dimethylsulphoxide on the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod 1988; 3:960-967.
18. Maro B, Johnson MH, Pickering SJ, Flach G. Changes in actin distribution during fertilization of the mouse egg. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1984; 81:211-237.
19. Vincent C, Pruliere G, Pajot-Augy E, Campion E, Garnier V, Renard JP. Effects of cryoprotectants on actin filaments during the cryopreservation of one-cell rabbit embryos. Cryobiology 1990; 27:9-23.
20. Kola I, Kirby C, Shaw J, Davey A, Trounson A. Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploid and malformed fetuses. Teratology 1988; 38:467-474.
21. Shaw JM, Trounson AO. Parthenogenic activation of unfertilized mouse oocytes by exposure to 1,2-propanediol is influenced by temperature, oocyte age, and cumulus removal. Gamete Res 1989; 24: 269-279.
22. Georgian L, Moraru I. The possible effect of high concentrations of propylene glycol on mitosis in human lymphocytes in vitro. Morphol Embryol 1985; 31:159-161.
23. Fitzgerald PH. Premature centromere division and other centromeric misbehavior. In: Vig BK (ed.), Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 1993: 87-92.
24. Bajnoczky K, Mehes K. Parental centromere separation sequence and aneuploidy in the offspring. Hum Genet 1988; 78:286-288.
25. Rodman TC. Chromatid disjunction in unfertilized ageing oocytes. Nature 1971; 233:191-193.
26. Angell RR. Predivision in human oocytes at meiosis I: a mechanism for trisomy formation in man. Hum Genet 1991; 86:383-387.
27. Simchen G, Hugerat Y. What determines whether chromosomes segregate reductionally or equationally in meiosis? Bioessays 1993; 15: 1-8.
28. Hunt P, LeMaire R, Embury P, Sheean L, Mroz K. Analysis of chromosome behavior in intact mammalian oocytes: monitoring the segregation of a univalent chromosome during female meiosis. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4:2007-2012.
29. Soewarto D, Schimiady H, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Consequences of non-extrusion of the first polar body and control of the sequential segregation of homologues and chromatids in mammalian oocytes. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:2350-2360.
30. Parry EM, Henderson L, Mackay JM. Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Procedures for the detection of chemically induced aneuploidy: recommendations of a UK environmental mutagen society working group. Mutagenesis 1995; 10:1-14.
31. Mackay JM, Elliott BM. Dose-ranging and dose-setting for in vivo genetic toxicology studies. Mutat Res 1992; 271:97-99.
32. Fielder RJ, Allen JA, Boobis AR, Botham PA, Doe J, Esdaile DJ, Gatehouse DG, Hodson-Walker G, Morton DB, Kirkland DJ, Richold M. Report of British toxicology society/UK environmental mutagen society working group. Dose setting in in vivo mutagenicity assays. Mutagenesis 1992; 7:313-319.
33. 50 test. Fd Chem Toxicol 1990; 28:469-482.
34. Mavournin KH, Blakey DH, Cimino MC, Salamone MF, Heddle J. The in vivo micronucleus assay in mammalian bone marrow and peripheral blood. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutat Res 1990; 239:29-80.
35. Patty FA. Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Third Rev. Ed. New York; Wiley; 1981.
36. Mailhes JB, Yuan ZP. Cytogenetic technique for mouse metaphase II oocytes. Gamete Res 1987; 18:77-83.
37. Sluder G, Rieder C. The events and regulation of anaphase onset. In: Vig BK (ed.), Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993: 211-224.
38. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules on the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol 1979; 80:674-691.
39. Lambert AM. The role of chromosomes in anaphase trigger and nuclear envelope activity in spindle formation. Chromosoma 1980; 76: 295-308.
40. Rieder CL, Palazzo RE. Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:387-392.
41. Kubiak JZ, Weber M, de Pennart H, Winston NJ, Maro B. The metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes is controlled through microtubule-dependent destruction of cyclin B in the presence of CSF. EMBO J 1993; 12:3773-3778.
42. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:1301-1310.
43. Nasmyth K. Viewpoint: putting the cell cycle in order. Science 1996; 274:1643-1645.
44. King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM, Kirschner MW. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science 1996; 274:1652-1658.
45. Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 1989; 246:629-634.
46. Murray AM. Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls. Nature 1992; 359:599-604.
47. Sluder G, Begg DA. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol 1983; 97:877-886.
48. Kung AL, Sherwood SW, Schimke RT. Cell-line specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:9553-9557.
49. Hunt T, Luca F, Ruderman JV. The requirements for protein synthesis and degradation, and the control of destruction of cyclins A and B in the meiotic and mitotic cell cycles of the clam embryo. J Cell Biol 1992; 116:707-724.
50. Spencer F, Hieter P. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 8908-8912.
51. Callan HG, Jacobs PA. The meiotic process in Mantis Religiosa L. males. J Genet 1952; 55:200-217.
52. Tomkiel J, Cooke CA, Saitoh H, Bernat RL, Earnshaw WC. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J Cell Biol 1994; 125:531-545.
53. Jordan MA, Thrower D, Wilson L. Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:401-416.
54. Jordan MA, Toso RJ, Thrower D, Wilson L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:9552-9556.
55. Wendell KL, Wilson L, Jordan MA. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J Cell Sci 1993; 104:262-274.
56. Rieder CL, Alexander SP. The attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle and the production of aneuploidy in newt lung cells. In: Resnick MA, Vig BK (eds.), Mechanisms of Chromosome Distribution and Aneuploidy. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1989: 185-194.
57. Reider CL, Davison EA, Jensen LCW, Cassimeris L, Salmon ED. Oscillatory movements of monoorientated chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and spindle. J Cell Biol 1986; 103:581-591.
58. Sluder G, Begg DA. Experimental analysis of the reproduction of spindle poles. J Cell Sci 1985; 76:35-51.
59. Davis B. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 1971; 113:251-272.
60. Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Bimby D, Orr-Weaver TL. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 1992; 130:827-841.
61. Miyazaki WY, Orr-Weaver TL. Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants. Genetics 1992; 132:1047-1061.
62. Sagata N, Daar I, Oskarsson M, Showalter SD, Vande Woode GF. The product of mos protooncogene as candidate "initiator" for oocyte maturation. Science 1989; 245:643-646.
63. Watanabe N, Vande Woode GF, Ikawa Y, Sagata N. Specific proteolysis of the c-mos protooncogene product by calpain upon fertilization of Xenopus eggs. Nature 1989; 342:505-511.
64. Nebrada AR, Hunt T. The c-mos proto-oncogene protein kinase turns on and maintains the activity of MAP kinase, but not MPF, in cell-free extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs. EMBO J 1993; 12:1979-1986.
65. Colledge WH, Carlton MBL, Udy GB, Evans MJ. Disruption of c-mos causes parthenogenetic development of unfertilized mouse eggs. Nature 1994; 370:65-68.
66. Holloway SL, Glotzer M, King RW, Murray AW. Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation promotion factor. Cell 1993; 73:1393-1402.
67. 2+ is essential for spontaneous meiotic resumption by mouse oocytes. J Exp Zool 1991; 260:401-405.
68. Kline D, Kline JT. Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev Biol 1992; 149:80-89.
69. Whitaker M, Patel R. Calcium and cell cycle control. Development 1990; 108:525-542.
70. 2+ independent in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Biol 1992; 117:799-811.
71. Homa ST, Carroll J, Swann K. The role of calcium in mammalian oocyte maturation and egg activation. Hum Reprod 1993; 8:1274-1281.
72. Wolniak SM, Larsen PM. Changes in the metaphase transit times and the pattern of sister chromatid separation in stamen hairs of Tradescantia after treatment with protein phosphatase inhibitors. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:691-715.
73. Racowsky C. Gamete resources: origin and production of oocytes. In: Pedersen RA, McLaren A. First NL (eds.), Animal Applications of Research in Mammalian Development. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 1991: 23-81.
74. Chesnel F, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ. Acquisition of meiotic competence by denuded mouse oocytes: participation of somatic-cell product(s) and cAMP. Dev Biol 1994; 161:285-295.
75. Eppig JJ, Schultz RM, O'Brien M, Chesnel F. Relationship between the developmental program controlling nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1994; 164:1-9.
76. Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Mechanisms of nondisjunction in mammalian meiosis. In: Pedersen RA (ed.), Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Vol. 29. New York: Academic Press; 1994: 281-324.
77. Mailhes JB, Marchetti F, Young D. Synergism between gonadotrophin and vinblastine sulfate relative to the frequencies of metaphase I, diploid and aneuploid mouse oocytes. Mutagenesis 1995; 10:185-188.
78. Mailhes JB, Young D, London SN. Cytogenetic effects of caffeine during in vivo mouse oocyte maturation. Mutagenesis 1996; 11:395-399.
79. Racowsky C. Follicular control of meiotic maturation in mammalian oocytes. In: Bavister BD (ed.), Preimplantation Embryo Development. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993: 22-37.
80. Sullivan BA, Schwartz S, Willard HF. Centromeres of human chromosomes. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996; 28:182-191.
81. Cooke CA, Heck MMS, Earnshaw WC. The inner centromere protein (INCENP) antigens: movement from inner centromere to midbody during mitosis. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:2053-2067.
82. Bicknell SE, Orr-Weaver TL. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays 1996; 18:293-300.
83. Preston RJ. Aneuploidy in germ cells: disruption of chromosome mover components. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996; 28:176-181.
84. McIntosh JR, Pfarr CM. Mitotic motors. J Cell Biol 1991; 115:577-585.
85. Kerrebrock AW, Moore DP, Wu JS, Orr-Weaver TL. MEI-S332, a Drosophila protein required for sister-chromatid cohesion, can localize to meiotic centromere regions. Cell 1995; 83:247-256.