Breast cancer: Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5-T open imager and three-point Dixon technique

Radiology

Volumn 207, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 183-190

  Daniel, Bruce L ^a   Butts, Kim ^a   Glover, Gary H ^a   Cooper, Claudia ^a   Herfkens, Robert J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, localization; Breast neoplasms, MR; Gadolinium

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; GADOTERIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILICONE PROSTHESIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0031961643     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530315     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
2. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Evans WP, Harries SA, Bown S. MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. AJR 1994; 163:1039-1047.
3. Dixon TW. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984; 153:189-194.
4. Frankel S, Occhipinti K, Kaufman L, et al. Characteristics of magnetic resonance sequences used for imaging silicone gel, saline, and gel-saline implants at low field strengths. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:781-786.
5. Derby KA, Frankel SD, Kaufman DM, et al. Differentiation of silicone gel from water and fat in MR phase imaging of protons at 0.064 T. Radiology 1993; 189:617-620.
6. Frankel S, Occhipinti K, Kaufman L, et al. MRI findings in subjects with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:852-859.
7. Song SMH, Napel S, Pelc NJ, Glover GH. Phase unwrapping of MR phase images using Poisson equation. IEEE Trans Image Processing 1995; 4:667-676.
8. 0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991; 18:371-383.
9. Glover GH. Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. JMRI 1991; 1:521-530.
10. 0 images. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:628-630.
11. Yen YF, Ikeda DM, Herfkens RJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of breast disease with dynamic spiral MRI (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996; 745.
12. Whitney WS, Herfkens RJ, Silverman J, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced spectral-spatial MR imaging for evaluation of breast carcinoma (abstr). Radiology 1993; 189(P):136.
13. Dean KI, Komu M. Breast tumor imaging with ultra low field MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12:395-101.
14. Kuhl CK, Kreft BP, Hauswirth A, et al. MR mammography at 0.5 Tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T. ROFO 1995; 162:381-389.
15. Kuhl CK, Kreft BP, Hauswirth A, et al. MR mammography at 0.5 Tesla. II. The capacity to differentiate malignant and benign lesions in MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T. ROFO 1995; 162:482-491.
16. Bydder GM, Young IR. MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9:659-675.
17. Rosen BR, Wedeen VJ, Brady TJ. Selective saturation NMR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:813-818.
18. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
19. Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 1990; 15:287-304.
20. Gorczyca DP, Schneider E, DeBruhl ND, et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. AJR 1994; 162:305-310.
21. Schneider E, Chan TW. Selective MR imaging of silicone with the three-point Dixon technique. Radiology 1993; 187:89-93.
22. Graham SJ, Stanchev PL, Lloyd-Smith JOA, Bronskill MJ, Plewes DB. Changes in fibroglandular volume and water content of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle observed by MR imaging at 1.5 T. JMRI 1995; 5:695-701.
23. Hong X, Lian J, Kelley D, Roemer P, Weiskoff R. Separating fat and water in 3D breast MR images using triple-echo 3 point Dixon technique (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Third Scientific Meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance. Berkeley, Calif: Society for Magnetic Resonance, 1995; 646.
24. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.
25. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 193:97-102.