Hybrid rendering of multidimensional image data

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-10

  Englmeier, K H ^a   Haubner, M ^a   Losch A ^a   Eckstein, F ^c   Seemann, M D ^b   Van Eimeren, W ^a   Reiser, M ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

grey value interpolation; hybrid rendering; image processing; multidimensional images; multimodal; three dimensional angiography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030898506     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634687     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brunie L, Leitner F, Berthommier F, Cinquin P, Demongeot I, Interpretation of multimodal medical images using connectionist and variational methods. Technol Health Care 1995; 26. 91-9.
2. Heath DG, Soyer PA, Kuszyk BS et al. Three-dimensional spiral-CT during arterial portography comparison of three rendering techniques. Radiographics 1995; 15: 1001-11.
3. Hu X, Alperin N, Levin DN, Tan KK, Mengeot M. Visualization of MR angiographic data with segmentation and volume-rendering techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 539-46.
4. Barillot C, Lemoine D, Le Briquer L, Lachmann F, Gibaud D. Data fusion in medical imaging: merging multimodal and multipatient images, identification of structures and 3D display aspects. Eur J Radiol 1993; 17: 22-7.
5. Hayashi N, Endo S, Kurimato M, Nishijo H, Ono T, Takaku A. Functional image-guided neurosurgical simulation system using computerized three-dimensional graphics and dipole tracing. Neurosurgery 1995; 37: 694-703.
6. Groenemeyer DH, Seibel RM, Melzer A, Schmidt A. Image guided access techniques. Endosc-Surg-Allied-Technol 1995; 3: 69-75.
7. Georgi C. Imaging techniques and computers. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1994; 63: 8-16.
8. Bendl R, Pross J, Keller M, Burkelbach J, Schlegel W. VIRTUOS - A program for virtual radiotherapy simulation. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Jaffe CC, Felix R, eds. Computer Assisted Radiology 1993. Berlin: Sponger, 1993: 676-82.
9. Englmeier K-H, Wieber A, Milachowski KA, Hamburger C, Mittlmeier T. Methods and applications of three-dimensional imaging in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109: 186-90.
10. Arbit E, Galicich JH. Importance of image guided stereotactic biopsy to confirm diagnosis in an oncological setting. Am Surg Oncol 1994; 1: 368-72.
11. Peters TM, Henri CJ, Munger P, et al. Integration of stereoscopic DSA and 3D MRI for image-guided neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 289-99.
12. Smith KR, Frank KJ, Buchholz RD. The Neuro Station - a highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18: 247-56.
13. Galloway RL, Macunias RJ, Edwards CA. Interactive image-guided surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39: 1226-31.
14. Steiner H, Staudach A, Schaffer H. Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology: technique, possibilities and limitations. Hum-Reprod 1994; 9: 1773-8.
15. Huffman HM. Virtual reality meets medical education. In: Satava RM, Morgan K, Sieburg HB, Mattheus R, Christensen JP, eds. Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1995: 130-7.
16. Rhodes ML. Computer Graphics in Medicine. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1993; 11: 49.
17. Nelson TR, Elvins TT. Visualization of 3D Ultrasound Data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1993; 11: 50-7.
18. Magnenat-Thalmann X, Thalmann D. Image Synthesis Theory and Practice. Tokyo: Springer. 1987.
19. Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching Cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163-9.
20. Yun H, Park KH. Surface modeling method by polygonal primitives for visualizing three- dimensional volume data. The Visual Computer 1992; 8: 246-59.
21. Muller H, Stark M. Adaptive generation of surfaces in volume data. The Visual Computer 1993; 9: 182-99.
22. Foley JD, Van Dam A, Feiner SK, Hughes JF. Computer Graphics Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley. 1992.
23. Gouraud H. Continuous shading of curved surfaces. IEEE Trans Comput 1971; 20: 623-9.
24. Phong BT. Illumination for computer generated pictures. CACM 1975; 18: 449-55.
25. Chen L, Herman GT, Reynolds RA, Udupa JK. Surface shading in the cuberille environment. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1985; 5: 33-43.
26. Samet H, Webber RE. Hierarchical data structures and algorithms for computer graphics. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1988; 8: 48-68.
27. Dzik S, Ezrielev J. Representing surfaces with voxels. Comput Graphics 1992; 16: 295-301.
28. Höhne KH, Bomans M, Pommert A. 3D visualization of tomographic volume data using the generalized voxel model. The Visual Computer 1990; 6: 28-36.
29. Gordon D, Reynolds R. Image space shading of 3-dimensional objects. Comput Vision Graph Image Proc 1985; 29: 361-76.
30. Yagel R, Cohen D, Kaufman A. Normal estimation in 3D discrete space. The Visual Computer 1992; 8: 278-91.
31. Wallis JW, Miller TR, Lemer CA, Kleerup EC. Three-dimensional display in nuclear medicine. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1989; 8: 297-303.
32. Levoy M. A hybrid ray tracer for rendering polygon and volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1990; 10: 33-40.
33. Kaufman A, Yagel R, Cohen D. Intermixing surface and volume rendering. In: Höhne KH, Fuchs H, Pizer SM, eds. 3D imaging in medicine, algorithms, systems, applications NATO ASI Series Vol. 60. Berlin: Springer, 1990.
34. Goshtasby A, Tuner DA, Ackerman LV. Matching of tomographic slices for interpolation, IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992; 9: 507-16.
35. Herman GT, Zheng J, Buchholtz CA. Shape-based interpolation. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1992; 12: 69-79.
36. Raya SP, Udupa JK. Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1990; 9: 32-42.
37. Haralick RM, Shapiro LG. Computer and robot vision I. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
38. Durst MJ. Additional references to marching cubes. ACM Comput Graph 1988; 22: 72-3.
39. Levoy M. Volume rendering by adaptive refinement. The Visual Computer 1990; 6: 2-7.
40. Kalender WA, Wedding K, Polacin A. et al. Grundlagen der Gefäßdarstellung mit der Spiral-CT. Aktuel Radiol 1994; 4: 287-97.
41. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. AJR 1993; 1606: 1267-71.
42. Prokop M, Schaefer C, Kalender WA, Polacin A, Galanski M, Gefaßdarstellungen mit Spiral-Computertomographie. Radiologe 1993; 33: 694-704.
43. Englmeier KH, Fink U, Haubner M, et al. Ein Verfahren zur computergestutzten dreidimensionalen Subtraktionsangiographie mit Hilfe der Spiral-Rontgencomputertomographie. Radiologe 1996; 36: 360-4.