The detection of pulmonary metastases by helical CT: A clinicopathologic study in dogs

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 235-240

  Waters, David J ^b   Coakley, Fergus V ^a,c   Cohen, Mervyn D ^a   Davis, Mary M ^a   Karmazyn, Boaz ^a   Gonin, Rene ^a   Hanna, Mark P ^a   Knapp, Deborah W ^b   Heifetz, Stephen A ^a  

^a RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal studies; Computed tomography; Lungs, neoplasms; Osteosarcoma

Indexed keywords

PATHOLOGY;

ANIMAL STUDIES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CT IMAGE; FALSE POSITIVE; HELICAL CT; LUNG, NEOPLASM; OSTEOSARCOMAS; PULMONARY METASTASIS;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOG; LUNG METASTASIS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOSARCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0031957367     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199803000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Davis SD. CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extra-thoracic malignancy. Radiology 1991;180:1-12.
2. Peuchot M, Libshitz HI. Pulmonary metastatic disease: radiologic-surgical correlation. Radiology 1987;164:719-22.
3. Pass HI, Dwyer A, Makuch R, Roth JA. Detection of pulmonary metastases in patients with osteogenic and soft-tissue sarcomas: the superiority of CT scans compared with conventional linear tomograms using dynamic analysis. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:1261-5.
4. Costello P, Anderson W, Blume D. Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. Radiology 1991;179:875-6.
5. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Giraud R, Marquette CH. Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT. Radiology 1993;187:513-20.
6. Liang Y, Kruger RA. Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice helical scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners. Med Phys 1996;23:205-20.
7. Paranjpe DV, Bergin CJ. Spiral CT of the lungs; optimal technique and resolution compared with conventional CT. AJR 1994;162: 561-7.
8. Collie DA, Wright AR, Williams JR, Hashemi-Malayeri, Stevenson AJM, Turnbull CM. Comparison of spiral-acquisition computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease. Br J Radiol 1994;67: 436-44.
9. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
10. Withrow SJ, Powers BE, Straw RC, Wilkins RM. Comparative aspects of osteosarcoma: dog versus man. Clin Orthop 1991;270: 159-68.
11. Crow J, Slavin G, Kreel L. Pulmonary metastasis: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 1981;47:2595-602.
12. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 1993;189:647-56.
13. Buckley JA, Scott WW, Siegelman SS, et al. Pulmonary nodules: effect of increased data sampling on detection with spiral CT and confidence in diagnosis. Radiology 1995;196:395-400.
14. Luker GD, Bae KT, Siegel MJ, et al. Ghosting of pulmonary nodules with respiratory motion: comparison of helical and conventional CT using an in vitro pediatric model. AJR 1996;167: 1189-93.
15. Funke M, Kopka L, Fischer U, Oestman JW, Grabbe EH. Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: comparison of 2:1 and 1:1 pitch. Radiology 1994;193:339.
16. Wright AR, Collie DA, Williams JR, Hashemi-Malayeri B, Stevenson AJ, Turnbull CM. Pulmonary nodules: effect on detection of spiral CT pitch. Radiology 1996;199:837-41.
17. Naidich DP, Rusinek H, McGuinness G, Leitman B, McCauley DI, Henschke CI. Variables affecting pulmonary nodule detection with computed tomography: evaluation with three-dimensional computer simulation. J Thorac Imag 1993;8:291-9.
18. Brogden BG, Kelsy CA, Moseley RD. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1983;21:633-54.
19. Gottesmann MM. How cancer cells evade chemotherapy. Cancer Res 1993;53:747-54.
20. Heppner GH, Miller BE. Therapeutic implications of tumor heterogeneity. Semin Oncol 1989;16:91-105.