Reanalysis of oviposition and development rates in the Phytoseiidae using a phylogenetic autoregressive method

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 287-296

  Luh, Hang Kwang ^a   Croft, Brian A ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative methods; Development; Oviposition; Phytoseiidae

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031949471     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006026601114     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brook, D.R. and McLennan, D.A. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Chant, D.A. and McMurtry, J.A. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol. 20(4): 223-310.
3. Cheverud, J.M., Dow, M. and Leutenegger, W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weights among primates. Evolution 39: 1335-1351.
4. Cliff, A.D. and Ord, J.K. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Psion Press, London.
5. Cutton-Brock, T.H. and Harvey, P.H. 1984. Comparative approaches to investigating adaptation. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn, J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davis, (eds), pp. 7-29. Oxford.
6. Edwards, S. and Kot, M. 1995. Comparative methods at the species level: geographic variation in morphology and group size in Grey-crowned Babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis). Evolution 49: 1134-1146.
7. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 445-471.
9. Gittleman, J.L. and Kot, M. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39: 227-241.
10. Gittleman, J.L. and Luh, H.-K. 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 383-404.
11. Gittleman, J.L. and Luh, H.-K. 1994. Phylogeny, evolutionary models, and comparative methods: a simulation study. In Pattern and process: phylogenetic approaches to ecological problems, P. Eggleton and D. Vane-Wright (eds), pp. 103-122. Academic Press, London.
12. Gittleman, J.L., Anderson, C.G., Kot, M. and Luh, H.-K. 1996. Comparative tests of evolutionary lability and rates using molecular phylogenies. In New uses for new phylogenies, P.H. Harvey et al. (eds), pp. 289-307. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Harvey, P.H. and Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Methods in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain : body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
15. Legendre, P. and Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
16. Lynch, M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45: 1065-1080.
17. McMurtry, J.A. and Croft, B.A. 1997. Life styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles as biological control agents. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291-321.
18. Martins, E. P. and Garland, T., Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534-57.
19. Martins, E.P. and Hansen, T.F. 1995. Phylogenetic comparative methods: the statistical analysis of interspecific data. In Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior, E.P. Martins (ed.) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Miles, D.B. and Dunhan, A.E. 1993. Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: the use of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 587-619.
21. Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17-23.
22. Purvis, A., Gittleman, J.L. and Luh, H.-K. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167: 293-300.
23. Sabelis, M.W. and Bakker, F.M. 1992. How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 16: 203-225.
24. Sabelis, M.W. and Janssen, A. 1994. Evolution of life history patterns in the Phytoseiidae. In Mites: ecology and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns, M.A. Houck (ed.), pp. 70-98. Chapman & Hall, New York and London.
25. Sokal, R.R. and Oden, N.L. 1978a. Spatial autocorrelation in biology 1. Methodology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 199-228.
26. Sokal, R.R. and Oden, N.L. 1978b. Spatial autocorrelation in biology 2. Some biological applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 229-249.
27. Zhang, Z.-Q. 1995. Variance and covariance of ovipositional rates and developmental rates in the Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata): a phylogenetic consideration. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 139-146.