Digital image processing of screening mammograms: Application to masses;Traitement des mammographies de depistage par ordinateur: Application aux opacites

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 319-322

  Viton, J L ^a   Seradour, B ^b   Rasigni, M ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis; Image processing; Mammography; Masses

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0031944461     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Adler DD, Wahl RL. New methods for imaging the breast : techniques, findings, and potential AJR 1995;164:19-30.
2. Seradour B, Wait S, Jacquemier J, Dubuc M, Piana L. Modalités de lecture des mammographies de dépistage du programme des Bouches-du-Rhône. J Radiol 1997;78:49-54.
3. Bouhnik H, Desquerre-Aufort I, Noël A, Stinès J. Recommandations du groupe interdisciplinaire de mammographie (GIM) sur l'assurance de la qualité mammographique. Rev Im Med 1994;6: 447-54.
4. Astley SM, Taylor CJ. Combining cues for mammographie abnormalities. Proc. 1st British Machine Vision Conference 1990:253-8.
5. Astley S, Hutt I, Miller P et al. Automation in mammography : computer vision and human perception. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 1993;7(6):1313-38.
6. Claridge E, Ritcher JH. Measuring edge blur in mammographie lesions. Computer Assisted Radiology 93. Lemke et al édits., Springer Verlag, 1993, 612-7
7. Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM et al Digital mammography : an useful clinical tool for computed-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiologica 1993;34:426-39.
8. Claridge E, Ritcher JH. Characterisation of mammographie lesions. Digital Mammography. Elsevier, édit, Amsterdam, 1994, 241-50.
9. Viton JL, Rasigni G, Rasigni M, Llebaria A. A method for characterizing masses in mammograms. Optical Engineering 1996;35(12):3453-9.
10. Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE 1973;3:611-9.
11. Postaire JG. Classement, classification et théorie de la décision. De l'image à la décision. Dunod, édit., Paris, 1987. 39-54.
12. Pisano ED, Shtern F. Image processing and computed aided diagnosis in digital mammography : a clinical perspective. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 1993;7(6):1493-503.