Double reading of mammograms in the Bouches-du-Rhone screening programme. Results and costs, 1990-1995;Modalites de lecture des mammographies de depistage du programme des Bouches-du-Rhone. Resultats et couts 1990-1995

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 49-54

  Seradour B ^a   Wait, S ^b   Jacquemier, J ^c   Dubuc, M ^d   Piana, L ^a  

^a TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Consultant en Econ de la Ś ^*  (France)

^c Mamma des Bouches du Rhone ^*  (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

cost; double reading; effectiveness; mammography; recall; screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECONOMICS; FRANCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031045074     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baines CJ, McFarlane DV, Miller AB. The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. Investigative Radiol 1990; 25 : 971-6.
2. Ciccone G, Vineis P, Frigerio A, Segnan N. Inter-oberver and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation : a field study. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28A : 1054-8.
3. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 : 1493-9.
4. Kopans DB. The accuracy of mammographic interpretation (editorial). N Engl J Med 1994; 331 : 1521-2.
5. Anderson EDC, Muir BB, Walsh JS and Kirkpatrick AE. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening Clin Radiol 1994; 49 : 248-51.
6. Anttinen I, Pamilo M, Soiva M, Roiha M. Double reading of mammography screening films - one radiologist or two? Clin Radiol 1993; 48 : 414-21.
7. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiol 1994; 191 : 241-4.
8. Thurfjell E. Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading. Acta Radiol 1994; 35 : 345-50.
9. Bird RE. Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. Radiol 1990; 177 : 587.
10. Bouhnik H, Desquerre-Aufort I, Noel A, Stines J. Recommandations du groupe interdisciplinaire de mammographic (GIM) sur l'assurance de la qualité en mammographie. Revue d'Imagerie Médicale 1994; 6 : 447-54
11. Jacquemier J, Assada M, Aubert H et al. Recueil départemental des données histopronostiques en sénologie À propos de la campagne de dépistage des Bouches-du-Rhône. Bull Cancer 1992; 79 : 999-1008.
12. Lancry PJ, Wait S. Évaluation économique des dépistages de masse du cancer du sein. À propos de cinq programmes expérimentaux français. Paris : CREDES Rapport No 997, 1993.
13. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa.I. The problems of two paradoxes. II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43 : 543-558.
14. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false-positive findings in breast cancer screening. Analysis of false-positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 1996; 312 : 273-6
15. Lancry PJ, Fagnani F. Évaluation économique du dépistage systématique des cancers du sein et du col de l'utérus. Paris : COMAC-HSR, Paris.
16. Van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarssen GJ, de Koning HJ, Boer R and van der Maas PJ. How cost-effective is breast cancer screening in different EC countries? Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A : 1663-8.
17. Woodman CBJ, Threlfall AG, Boggis CRM, Prior P. Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS screening programme's north western region. BMJ 1995; 310 : 224-6.