Acute study on the efficacy and safety of an auditory brainstem prosthesis

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-45

  Liu, Xuguang ^a   Mcphee, Greg ^a   Seldon, H Lee ^a   Clark, Graeme M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

2 deoxyglucose; Auditory prosthesis; Brainstem; Cochlear nucleus; Guinea pig; Histology

Indexed keywords

DEOXYGLUCOSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY BRAINSTEM PROSTHESIS; BINAURAL HEARING; BIOPROSTHESIS; CELL DENSITY; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; DEAFNESS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; GUINEA PIGS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROELECTRODES; NEURONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031934737     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489850155107     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Eisenberg LS, Maltan AA, Portillo F, Mobley JP, House WF. Electrical stimulation of the auditory brain stem structure in deafened adults. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987; 24: 9-22.
2. Portillo F, Nelson RA, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV, Waring MD, Moore JK. Auditory brain stem implant: Electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. In: Fraysse B, Deguine O, eds. Cochlear implants. New perspectives. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. Basel: Karger, 1993; 48: 248-52.
3. Laszig R, Sollmann WP, Marangos N, Charachon R, Ramsden R. Nucleus 20-channel and 21-channel auditory brain stem implants: First European experiences. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 166 Suppl: 28-30.
4. Szelenyi Z, Zeisberger E, Bruck K. Effects of electrical stimulation in the lower brainstem on temperature regulation in the unanaesthetized guinea pig. Pflugers Archiv Eur J Physiol 1976; 364: 123-7.
5. Terr LI, Mobley JP, House WF. Biocompatibility of the central electroauditory prosthesis and the human cochlear nuclei. Am J Otol 1989; 10: 339-42.
6. Liu X, McPhee G, Seldon HL, Clark GM. Acute study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the guinea-pig following electrical stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 363-75.
7. McCreery DB, Yuen TGH, Agnew WF, Bullara LA. Stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrode in the cochlear nucleus of the cat: Histologic and physiologic effects. Hear Res 1992; 62: 42-56.
8. McCreery DB, Yuen TGH, Agnew WF, Bullara LA. Stimulus parameters affecting tissue injury during microstimulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. Hear Res 1994; 77: 105-15.
9. Niparko JK, Altschuler RA, Evans DA, Xue X, Farraye J, Anderson DJ. Auditory brainstem prosthesis: Biocompatibility of stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989; 101: 344-52.
10. Agnew W, McCreery D, Yuen T, Bullara LA. Effects of prolonged electrical stimulation of the central nervous system. In: Agnew W, McCreery D, eds. Neural prosthesis, fundamental studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990: 225-52.
11. Seldon HL. Three-dimensional reconstruction of temporal bone from CT scans on a personal computer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 1158-61.
12. Hackney CM, Osen KK, Kolston J. Anatomy of the cochlear nuclear complex of guinea-pig. Anat Embryol 1990; 182: 123-49.
13. Ni D, Seldon HL, Shepherd RK, Clark GM. Effect of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus neuron size in normal hearing kittens. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 489-97.
14. Sokoloff L, Reivich M, Kennedy C. The [14C]deoxyglucose method for measurement of local cerberal glucose utilization: Theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anaesthetized albino rat. J Neurochem 1977; 28: 897-916.
15. Schwartz DR, Schacht J, Miller JM, Frey K, Altschuler RA. Chronic electrical stimulation reverses deafness-related depression of electrically evoked 2-deoxyglucose activity in the guinea-pig inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1993; 70: 243-9.
16. Seldon HL, Kawano A, Clark GM. Does age at cochlear implantation affect the distribution of 2-deoxyglucose label in cat inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1996; 95: 108-19.
17. Evans DA, Niparko JK, Altschuler RA, Frey KA, Miller JM. Demonstration of prosthetic activation of central auditory pathways using [14C]-2-deoxyglucose. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 128-37.
18. El-Kashlan HK, Niparko JK, Altschuler RA, Miller JM. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: Surface vs. penetrating stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 105: 533-43.
19. 14C-2-deoxyglucose study. Hear Res 1988; 33: 245-56.
20. Clerici WJ, Coleman JR. Resting and high-frequency evoked 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the rat inferior colliculus: Developmental changes and effects of short-term conduction blockade. Dev Brain Res 1986; 27: 127-37.
21. Webster WR, Servere J, Brown M. Inhibitory contours in the inferior colliculus as revealed by the 2-deoxyglucose method. Exp Brain Res 1984; 56: 577-81.
22. Pasic TR, Rubel EW. Cochlear nucleus size is regulated by auditory nerve electrical activity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 6-13.
23. Chouard CH, Meyer B, Josset P, Buche JF. The effect of the acoustic nerve chronic electric stimulation upon the guinea-pig cochlear nucleus development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983; 95: 639-45.
24. Hultcrantz M, Snyder R, Rebscher S, Leake P. Effects of neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on the cochlear nucleus in cats. Hear Res 1991; 54: 272-80.
25. Lassmann H, Petsche U, Kitz Baran H, Speck G. The role of brain edema in epileptic brain damage induced by systemic kainite acid injection. Neuroscience 1984; 13: 691-704.