Mating system and sexual selection in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris (Mecoptera: Panorpidae)

Naturwissenschaften

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 219-228

  Sauer, Klaus Peter ^a   Lubjuhn, Thomas ^a   Sindern, Jörn ^a   Kullmann, Harald ^a   Kurtz, Joachim ^a   Epplen, Conny ^b   Epplen, Jörg Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSECT; MATING SYSTEM; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

COPULATION; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; INSECT; MATING; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PHENOTYPE; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SALIVATION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPERM;

MECOPTERA; PANORPA VULGARIS; PANORPIDAE;

EID: 0031927408     PISSN: 00281042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001140050487     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375-393
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
3. Bockwinkel G, Sauer KP (1991) Entstehung und Stabilisierung alternativer Paarungstaktiken bei Männchen von Panorpa vulgaris (Panorpidae, Mecoptera). Verhandlungen Westdeutscher Entomologie Tagung 1990 Düsseldorf, pp 171-192
4. Bockwinkel G, Sauer KP (1994) Resource dependence of male mating tactics in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris. Anim Behav 47:203-209
5. Darwin C (1872) The origin of species by means of natural selection. 6th edn. Murray, London
6. Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the "sperm loading" hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331-338
7. Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton
8. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223
9. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford
10. Fleck S, Sindern J, Sauer KP (1994) Nuptial feeding in relation to food availability in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 871:36
11. Fleck S (1997) Das Hochzeitsgeschenk der Skorpionsfliege Panorpa vulgaris: ein betrugssicherer Indikator für die genetische Qualität. Thesis, University Bonn
12. Johnstone RA (1995) Sexual selection, honest advertisment and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev 70:1-65
13. Keller L, Reeve HK (1995) Why do females male with multiple males? The sexually selected hypothesis. Adv Study Behav 24:291-315
14. Knowlton N, Greenwell SR (1984) Male sperm competition avoidance mechanisms: the influence of female interests. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, New York, pp 62-85
15. LaMunyon CW, Eisner T (1993) Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4689-4692
16. Maynard Smith J (1991) Theories of sexual selection, Trends Ecol Evol 6: 146-151
17. Noe R. Hammerstein P (1995) Biological markets. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 336-340
18. Parker GA (1970a) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525-567
19. Parker GA (1970h) Sperm competition and its evolutionary effect on copula duration in the Fly Scatophaga stercoraria. J Insect Physiol 16:1301-1328
20. Parker GA. Simnions LW, Kirk H (1990) Analysing sperm competition data: simple models for predicting mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:55-65
21. Sauer KP (1977) The adaptive significance of genetic variability of photopcriodic responce in Panorpa vulgaris. Zool Jahrbuch Syst 104:489-538
22. Sauer KP (1996) Sexuelle Selektion und ökologische Differenzierung. J Zoo Syst Evol Research 34:235-244
23. Sauer KP, Riebel W, Bockwinkel G (1990) Einfluß von Reihenfolge und Kopulationsdauer der Männchen von Panorpa vulgaris (Mccoptera) auf die Vaterschaft. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 83:656-657
24. Sauer KP, Sindern J, Kall N (1997) Nutritional status of males and sperm transfer in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris. Entomol Gen 21: 189-204
25. Sindern J, Kullmann H, Fleck S, Sauer KP (1994) Does "male choice" exist in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 87 1:58
26. Sindern, J. Kullmann H. Sauer KP (1995) Evidence for male choice in both sexes in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 88 1 :52
27. Sindern J (1996) Einfluß der Nahrungsdichte auf die Lebensgeschichte und Fitness von Individuen der Skorpionsfliege Panorpa vulgaris. Thesis, University Bonn
28. Thornhill R (1981) Panorpa (Mecoplera: Panorpidac) seorpionflies: systems for understanding resource-defense-polygyny and alternative male reproductive effort. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:355-386
29. Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus and its implications. Am Nat 122:765-788
30. Thornhill R (1992) Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera). Behav Ecol 3:277-283
31. Thornhill R, Sauer KP (1991) The notal organ of the scorpionfly (Panorpa vulgaris): an adaptation to coerce mating duration. Behav Ecol 2: 156-164
32. Thornhill R, Sauer KP (1992) Genctic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim Behav 43:253-264
33. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205-214