High-resolution MR cholangiopancreatography

Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging

Volumn 39, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 115-258

  Watanabe, Yuji ^a   Dohke, Masako ^a   Ishimori, Takayoshi ^a   Amoh, Yoshiki ^a   Oda, Kazushige ^a   Okumura, Akira ^a   Mitsudo, Kazuyo ^a   Dodo, Yoshihiro ^a  

^a KURASHIKI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bile duct; Cholangiopancreatography; High resolution; Magnetic resonance (MR); Pancreas

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CHOLELITHIASIS; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; COMMON BILE DUCT CYST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GALLBLADDER CANCER; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PANCREAS DISEASE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS;

BILIARY TRACT; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES;

EID: 0031926074     PISSN: 10408371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10408379891244181     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, and Freicrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast- : enhanced fast sequence. Radiology, 1991;181:805-808.
2. Morimoto K, Shiomi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology, 1992;183:578-580.
3. Hall-Craggs M, Allen C, Owens C, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology, 1993; 189:423-427.
4. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, and Barkum AN. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR, 1994;163:847-850.
5. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology, 1995;197:109-115.
6. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology, 1994;192:73-78.
7. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR, 1995;165:295-300.
8. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology, 1995;196:459-464.
9. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging. AJR, 1995;165:1397-1401.
10. Mizutani Y. Short Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with single slice method using HASTE sequence. Jpn J Magn Reson Med, 1995;15:187-195.
11. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, et al. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence:comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. JCAT, 1996;20(5):798-802.
12. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR, 1996;166:1297-1303.
13. Reinhold C, Guibaud L, Genin G, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. JMRI, 1995;4:379-384.
14. Reinhold C and Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR, 1996;166:1285-1295.
15. Reinhold C, Bret PM, Guibaud L, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: potential clinic applications. Radio Graphics, 1996;16:309-320.
16. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, and Kobayashi T. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastroenterol, 1993;88: 2072-2077.
17. Dohke M, Watanabe Y, Saga T, et al. High-resolution MR-cholangiopancreatography. Radiology, 1995;197:513 (Abstr.)
18. Dohke M, Watanabe Y, Amoh Y, et al. High-resolution MRCP. AJR, 1996;166(3): 216 (Abstr.)
19. Watanabe Y and Dohke M. Clinical application of high-resolution MRCP. In: Endo K., ed., New imaging modalities of cancer. Tokyo, Iyaku Journal, 1996:55-74.
20. Maccaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology, 1995;196:227-232.
21. Laubenberger J, Buchert M, Schneider B, Blum U, Henning J, and Langer M. Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance-cholangio-pancreaticography (MRCP): A new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med, 1995;33:18-23.
22. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ishimori T, et al. Pseudostenosis of extrahepatic bile duct on MR cholangiopancreatography. 5th scientific meeting and exhibition of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine in Vancouver (accepted)
23. Henkelman RM, Hardy PA, Bishop JE, Poon CS, and Plewes DB. Why fat is bright in RARE and fast spin-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:533-40.
24. Vinitski S, Mitchell DG, Einstein SG, et al. Conventional and fast spin-echo MR imaging: minimizing echo time. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1993;3:501-7.
25. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Amoh Y, et al. Clinical application of fat suppression technique. Eizoh-joho-medical, 1996;28(10):613-619.
26. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, and Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR, 1990;154:623-629.
27. Takahara T, Saeki M, Nosaka S, et al. The usefulness of high-concentration Ferricelutz in MR cholangiography. Jpn J Magn Reson Med, 1997;14:298.
28. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas:efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology, 1994;193:683-688.
29. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Saponaro S, et al. Liver and pancreas: improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5T. Radiology, 1991;178:67-71.
30. Semelka RC and Ascher SM. MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology, 1993;188: 593-602.
31. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Amoh Y, et al. Detection, severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis:Evaluation with fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted SE images. Radiology, 1996;201 (P):494.
32. Dohke Y, Watanabe Y, Amoh Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the portal venous system. 5th scientific meeting and exhibition of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine in Vancouver (accepted)
33. McFarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S, et al. Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: Value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR, 1996;166:37-43.
34. Freeny PC and Lawson TL. Radiology of the Pancreas. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.
35. Stott MA, Farrand PA, Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Browning JJ, and Sutton R. Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystetomy. J Clin Ultrasound, 1987;15:185-190.
36. O'Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, Watters J, Lintott DJ, and Axon AT. Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest Radiol, 1986;11:161-164.
37. Callen PW, London SS, and Moss AA. Computed tomographic evaluation of the dilated pancreatic duct: the value of thinsection collimation. Radiology, 1980;134: 253-255.
38. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology, 1987:162:419-424.
39. Low RN, Sigeti JS, Francis IR, et al. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. AJR, 1994;162:315-323.
40. Silvis ES and Ansel HJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: application in biliary tract disease. In: Berk JE, ed. Gastroenterology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985;3569-3579.
41. Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Perri V, Gabrielli A, Locicero P, and Crucitti F. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with Billroth II Gastroectomy. Acuta Gastroenterol Belg, 1994;57:155-62.
42. Thon HJ, Loffler A, Buess G, and Gheorghiu T. Is ERCP a reasonable diagnostic method for excluding panreatic and hepatobiliary disease in patients with a Billroth II resection? Endoscopy, 1983;15:93-5.
43. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, Bailey IA, James D, and Fossard DP. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet, 1988;2(8618):979-983.
44. Fan ST, Lai Ec, Mok FP, Lo CM, Zheng SS, and Wong J. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med, 1993;328:228-232.
45. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, and Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology, 1976:70:314-320.
46. Siegel JH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Technique, diagnosis and therapy. Raven Press, New York 1994
47. Agha FD. Williams KD. Pancreas divisum: incidence, detection, and clinical significance. Am J Gastroenterol, 1987;82:315-320
48. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Enhanced delineation of the pancreatic duct in MR cholangiopancreatotraphy (MRCP) with a combined use of secretin. Nippon Igaku Houshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 1995;55;255-6.
49. Itoh H, Saito M, Ishimori M, Ohshiro K, Guo YY, Sakai T. A case report of dorsal pancreas agenesis diagnosed by MRI and ERCP. Radiat Med, 1991;9:108-9.
50. Miyano T, Suruga K, Suda K, The choledoco-pancreatic long common channel disorders in relation to the etiology of congenital biliary dilatation and other biliary tract disease. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1981;10:419-26.
51. Sharama SS. Pancreaticobiliary ductal union in cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc, 1994;40:171-173.
52. Fink AS. Commentary: Controversies in the management of common bile duct calculi. Surg Clin North Am, 1994; 74:949-950.
53. Bakan DA and Barnhart JL. Determination of parameters effecting proton relaxation of hepatic and gallbladder biles in dogs. Hepatology, 1988;8:341-346.
54. Loflin TG, Simeone JF, Mueller PR, et al. Gallbladder bile in cholecystitis: in vitro MR evaluation. Radiology, 1985;157:457-459.
55. Hricak H, Fill RA, Margulis AR, Moon KL, Crooks LE, and Kaufman L. Work in progress: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. Radiology, 1983;147:481-484.
56. Kelekis NL and Semelka RC. MR imaging of the gallbladder. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996; 8(5):312-320.
57. Dahnert W. Radiology Review Manual. 3rd ed., Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore MD, 1996.
58. Axon ATR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: Cambridge classification. Radiol Clin North Am, 1989;27:39-50.
59. Cavallini G, Rigo L, Bovo P, et al. Abnormal US response of main pancreatic duct after secretin stimulation in patients with acute pancretitis of different etiology. J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994;18:298-303.
60. Kreel L and Sandin B. Changes in pancreatic morphology associated with aging. Gut, 1973;14:962-970.
61. MacCarty RL, Stephens DH, Brown AL Jr, and Carlson HC: Retrograde pancreatography in autopsy specimen. AJR, 1975;123:359-366.
62. Itai Y, Moss AA, and Ohtomo K. Computed tomography of cystadenoma and cystadenocaricnoma of pancreas. Radiology, 1982;145:419-425.
63. Procacci C, Graziani R, Bicego E, et al. Intraductal mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas: imaging findings. Radiology, 1996;198:249-57.
64. Itai Y. Ohahshi K, Nagai H, et al. Ductectatic mucinous cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Radiology, 1986; 161:697-700.
65. Itoh S, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Maruyama K, and Senda K. Mucin-producing pancreatic tumor: CT findings and histopathologic correlation. Radiology, 1992;183:81-86
66. Takehara Y. MR pancreatography: technique and applications. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996;8(5):290-301.
67. Gambill EE. Pancreatitis associated with pancretic carcinoma: A study of 26 caces. Mayo Clin Proc, 1971;46:174-7.
68. Yamaguchi K. Pancreatic carcinoma associated with chronic calcifying pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol, 1992;12:297-303.