Diversity in aphasiology: Crisis or increasing competence?

Aphasiology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 435-447

  Petheram, Brian ^a,b   Parr, Susie ^c  

^a FRENCHAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 0031921143     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687039808249542     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ALBYN DAVIS G. 1994, Theory as the base on which to build treatment of aphasia American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 3, 8-10.
2. BASTIAANSE, R. and PRINS, R. 1994, Communicative speech therapy in aphasia: what does it mean, can it be effective and how should it be done? Aphasiology, 8, 482-488.
3. BENCH, R. 1989, Science and theory in communication disorders: A response to siegel and ingham . Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 296-298.
4. BRITISH APHASIOLOGY SOCIETY 1992, Advice to purchasers. Society Publication.
5. BURY, M. 1991, The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13, 451-468.
6. BYNG, S., KAY, J., EDMUNDSON, A. and SCOTT, C. 1990, Aphasia tests reconsidered Aphasiology 4, 67-93.
7. CODE, C. 1994, Mechanisms underlying recovery from aphasia. Proceedings of 24th Clinical Aphasiology Conference, 5-8 June 1994,
8. DAVID, R. 1990, Aphasia assessment: the acid test. Aphasiology, 4, 103-109.
9. EASTWOOD, J. 1988, Qualitative research: An additional research methodology for speech pathology? British journal of Disorders of communication, 23, 171-184.
10. FINKELSTEIN, V. and FRENCH, S. 1993, Towards a psychology of disability. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French and M. Oliver (Eds) Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments (London: OU Publications and Sage), pp. 26-34.
11. FRANK, A. 1991, At the Will of the Body (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).
12. FRATTALI, C. 1992, Functional assessment of communication : merging public policy with clinical views. Aphasiology, 6, 63-85.
13. FRENCH, S. 1994, On Equal Terms : Working with Disabled People (London : Butterworth Heinemann).
14. GARMAN, M. 1994, Aphasia and communicative speech therapy: the potential of grammatical analyses. Aphasiology, 5, 491-496.
15. GOODGLASS, H. 1990, Cognitive psychology and clinical aphasiology. Aphasiology, 4, 93-97.
16. GOODGLASS, H. AND KAPLAN, E. 1972, Assessment of aphasia and related disorders (Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger).
17. HOLLAND, A. 1980, CADL: Communicative Abilities in Daily Living (Baltimore: University Park Press).
18. HOLLAND, A. and BEESON, P. 1993, Finding a new sense of self: what the clinician can do to help. Aphasiology, 7, 581-584.
19. HOWARD, D. and HATFIELD, F. 1987, Aphasia Therapy : Historical and Contemporary Issues. (Hove, UK : Lawrence Erlbaum Associations).
20. JACKSON, M. C. 1991, Systems Methodologies for the Management Sciences (Chichester UK: John Wiley), pp. 264-270.
21. JORDAN, L. 1991, A profile of aphasia services in three health districts. British journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 293-315.
22. KAGAN, A. and GAILEY, G. 1993, Functional is not enough: training conversation for aphasic partners. In A. Holland, and M. Forbes (Eds) Aphasia Treatment: World Perspectives (San Diego: Singular Publishing Group), pp. 199-225.
23. KERTESZ, A. 1982, Western Aphasia Battery (New York: Grune & Stratton).
24. KLEINMAN, A. 1988, The Illness Narratives: Suffering Healing and the Human Condition (California: Basic Books).
25. LEIWO, M. 1994, Aphasia and communicative speech therapy. Aphasiology, 8, 467-506.
26. LESSER, R. and MILROY, L. 1993, Linguistics and Aphasia: Psycholinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects of Intervention (Longman: Essex).
27. LINCOLN, N. 1982, The Speech Questionnaire: an assessment of functional language ability. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 4, 114-117.
28. LOMAS, J., PICKARD, L., BESTER, S., ELBARD, H., FINLAYSON, A. and ZOGHAIB, C. 1989, The Communicative Effectiveness Index : development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia, journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 54, 113-124.
29. LYON, J. 1996, Optimising communication and participation in life for aphasic adults and their prime care givers in natural settings : a use model for treatment. In G. A. Wallace (Ed.) Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation (Newtown M.A. : Butterworth Heinemann).
30. MASON, J. 1994, Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. In A. Bryman and R. Burgess (Eds) Analysing Qualitative Data (London: Routledge), pp. 89-110.
31. MAYS, N. and POPE, C. 1995, Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42-45.
32. NORTH WESTERN REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY 1995, Breaking down barriers: guidelines for purchasers of services for disabled adults aged 16-64 with physical and sensory impairments (Warrington: North Western Health Authority).
33. PARR, S. 1996, Everyday literacy in aphasia: radical approaches to functional assessment and therapy. Aphasiology, 10, 469-479.
34. PARR, S. 1996, The road more travelled: whose right of way? A response to Pierce, Gonzalez. Aphasiology, 10, 496-503.
35. PARR, S., POUND, C. and MARSHALL, J. 1995, A handful of power for aphasic people. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapist' Bulletin, 527, 8-9.
36. POPPER, K. 1968, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (New York: Basic Books).
37. PORCH, B. 1973, Porch Index of Communicative Ability (Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists' Press).
38. PRUTTING, C., MENTIS, M. and NELSON, P. 1989, Critique of Siegel: The limits of 'The limits of science in communication disorders'. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 296-302.
39. RINGEL, R., TRACHTMAN, L. and PRUTTING, C. 1984, The science in human communication sciences. Journal of American Speech and Hearing Association, December, 33-37
40. SACCHETT, C. and MARSHALL, J. 1992, Functional assessment of communication: Implications for the rehabilitation of aphasic people: reply to Carol Frattali. Aphasiology, 6, 95-101.
41. SCHUELL, H. 1965, Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia with the Minnesota Test (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis).
42. SIEGEL, G. and INGHAM, R. 1987, Theory and science in communication disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 99-104.
43. STAINTON-ROGERS, W. 1991, Explaining Health and Illness (Harvester Wheatsheaf: New York).
44. ULRICH, W. 1991, Critical heuristics of social systems design. In R. Flood and M. Jackson (Eds) Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings (Chichester: Wiley), pp.
45. WERTZ, R. T. 1984, Language disorders in adults: State of the clinical art. In A. Holland (Ed) Language Disorders in Adults (San Diego : College-Hill Press), pp.
46. WORRALL, L. 1992, Functional communication assessment: an Australian perspective. Aphasiology, 6, 105-111.