Rapid tip tracking with MRI by a limited projection reconstruction technique

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 262-264

  Shimizu, Kenji ^a,c   Mulkern, Robert V ^b   Oshio, Koichi ^a   Panych, Lawrence P ^a   Yoo, Seung Schik ^a   Kikinis, Ron ^a   Jolesz, Ferenc A ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Device tracking; Intraventional MRI; Projection reconstruction; Rapid imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOPSY; DEVICE; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; NEEDLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0031909107     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080145     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al. Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 1995; 195:805-814.
2. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 1995; 197:175-181.
3. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD. Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:411-415.
4. Leung DA, Debatin JF, Wildermuth S, et al. Intravascular MR tracking catheter: preliminary experimentation evaluation. AJR 1995; 164:1265-1270.
5. Leung DA, Debatin JF, Wildermuth S, et al. Real-time biplanar needle tracking for interventional MR imaging procedures. Radiology 1995; 197:485-488.
6. Wildermuth S, Debatin JF, Leung DA, et al. MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures: initial demonstration in a pig model. Radiology 1997; 202:578-583.
7. Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Weber J, van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WP. Visualization of dedicated catheters using fast scanning techniques with potential for MR-guided vascular interventions. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:816-820.
8. Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Hurtak WF, van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WPTM. MR-guided endovascular interventions: susceptibility-based catheter and near-real-time imaging technique. Radiology 1997; 202: 273-276.
9. Rubin DL, Ratner AV, Young SW. Magnetic susceptibility effects and their application in the development of new ferromagnetic catheters for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1325-1332.
10. Köchli VD, McKinnon GC, Hofmann E, von Schulthess GK. Vascular interventions guided by ultrafast MR imaging: evaluation of different materials. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:309-314.
11. Van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:671-675.
12. Hu X, Parrish T. Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:691-694.
13. Fredrickson JO, Pelc NJ. Temporal resolution improvement in dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:621-625.
14. Glover GH, Pauly JM. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992; 28:275-289.
15. Rasche V, Holz D, Schepper W. Radial turbo spin echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32:629-638.
16. Rasche V, de Boer RW, Holtz D, Proksa R. Continuous radial data acquisition for dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 754-761.
17. Bracewell RN, Riddle AC. Inversion of fan-beam scans in radio astronomy. Astrophys J 1967; 150:427-434.
18. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wu DH. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:918-924.