MR-guided endovascular interventions: Susceptibility-based catheter and near-real-time imaging technique

Radiology

Volumn 202, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 273-276

  Bakker, Christianus J ^a   Hoogeveen, Romhild M ^a   Hurtak, Wenzel F ^b   Van Vaals, Joop J ^c   Viergever, Max A ^a   Mali, Willem P T M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Research and Development Department   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheters and catheterization, technology; Interventional procedures, technology; Magnetic resonance (MR), guidance; Veins, MR

Indexed keywords

DYSPROSIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031012185     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988223     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jolesz FA, Blumenfeld SM. Interventional use of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1994; 10:85-96.
2. Lufkin RB. Interventional MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:16-18.
3. Ackerman JL, Offut MC, Buxton RB, Brady TJ. Rapid 3D tracking of small RF coils (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1986. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1986; 1131.
4. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD. Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:411-415.
5. Leung DA, Debatin JF, Wildermuth S, et al. Intravascular MR tracking catheter: preliminary experimental evaluation. AJR 1995; 164:1265-1270.
6. Rubin DL, Ratner AV, Young SW. Magnetic susceptibility effects and their application in the development of new ferromagnetic catheters for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1325-1332.
7. Koechli VD, McKinnon GC, Hofmann E, Von Schulthess GK. Vascular interventions guided by ultrafast imaging: evaluation of different materials. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:309-314.
8. Bakker CJG, Weber J, Van Vaals JJ, Viergever MA, Mali WPTM. Dedicated catheters for susceptibility-based MR visualization (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1996. Berkeley, Calif: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996; 900.
9. Van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. JMRI 1993; 3:671-675.
10. Hu X, Parrish T. Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:691-694.
11. Fredrickson JO, Pelc NJ. Temporal resolution improvement in dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:621-625.
12. Luedeke KM, Roeschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3:329-343.
13. Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11:539-548.
14. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJG, Viergever MA. Reduced VENC dependency and improved phase contrast angiograms with phase gradient images (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1996. Berkeley, Calif: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996; 244.