Validating medical equipment repair and maintenance metrics, part II: Results of the 1997 survey

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 136-144

  Cohen, Ted ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BUDGETS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES, HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; MAINTENANCE AND ENGINEERING, HOSPITAL; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT, HOSPITAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0031901660     PISSN: 08998205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Cohen T, Bakuzonis C, Friedman S, Roa R. Benchmark indicators for medical equipment repair and maintenance. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1995;29:308-21.
2. Cohen T. Validating medical equipment repair and maintenance metrics: a progress report. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1997;31:23-32.
3. Efron T. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
4. Stiefel R. Clinical Engineering Cannot Do Benchmarking. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1997;31:286-8.