Morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions: Procrustes, euclidean, and cephalometric analyses

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 162-170

  Singh, G D ^a   Mcnamara Jr , J A ^b   Lozanoff, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

EDMA; Facial; Morphology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL BASE;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PROGNATHISM;

EID: 0031898318     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1998)11:3<162::AID-CA3>3.0.CO;2-V     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ayoub, A.F., D.R. Stirrups and K.F. Moos 1994 Assessment of chin surgery by a coordinate free method. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 23:6-10.
2. Ayoub, A.F., D.R. Stirrups and K.F. Moos 1995 Stability of sagittal split advancement osteotomy: Single- versus double-jaw surgery. Int. J. Adult Orthognath. Surg. 3:181-192.
3. Bailey, L.J., W.R. Proffit and R.P. White 1995 Trends in surgical treatment of Class III skeletal relationships. Int. J. Adult Orthod. 10:108-118.
4. Bittner, C. and H. Pancherz 1990 Facial morphology and malocclusions. Am. J. Orthod. and Dentofac. Orthop. 97:308-315.
5. Chang, H.P., Z. Kinoshita and T. Kawamoto 1992 Craniofacial pattern associated with Class III deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod. 62:139-144.
6. Chang, H.P., Z. Kinoshita and T. Kawamoto 1993 A study of the growth changes in facial configuration. Eur. J. Orthod. 15:493-501.
7. Collet, A.R. and V.C. West 1993 Terminology of facial morphology in the vertical dimension. Aust. Dent. J. 38:204-209.
8. De Alba, Y., J.A. Levy, A.A. Caputo and S.J. Chaconas 1979a Effects of orthodontic intermaxillary Class III mechanics on craniofacial structures. Part I photoelastic analysis. Angle Orthod. 49:21-28.
9. De Alba, Y., J.A. Levy, S.J. Chaconas and A.A. Caputo 1979b Effects of orthodontic intermaxillary Class III mechanics on craniofacial structures. Part II computerized cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 49:29-36.
10. Dibbets, J.M. 1996 Morphological associations between the Angle classes. Eur. J. Orthod. 18:111-118.
11. Fleury, J.E., D. Deboest, N. Maffre, M. Lacour, O. Deneuville and C. Assaad 1994 Fundamental elements of maxillofacial orthodontics in the treatment of sagittal maxillo-mandibular disproportion. Rev. Stomatol. Chir. Maxillofac. 95:147-150.
12. Gasson, M. and J. Lavergne 1977a The maxillary rotation: Its relation to the cranial base and the mandibular corpus. An implant study. Acta Odont. Scand. 33:89-94.
13. Gasson, M. and J. Lavergne 1977b Maxillary rotation during human growth: annual variation and correlations with mandibular rotation: A metal implant study. Acta Odont. Scand. 35:13-21.
14. Gower, J.C. 1975 Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.
15. Guyer, E.C., E. Ellis, J.A. McNamara, Jr. and R.G. Behrents 1986 Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 56:7-30.
16. Iseri, H. and B. Solow 1995 Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years: An implant study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 107:48-57.
17. Keeling, S.O., M.L. Riolo, R.E. Martin and T.R. Ten Have 1989 A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 95:297-305.
18. King, A.H. and E.D. Scheiderman 1993 Differential growth among components of the palate in rhesus monkey (Macaco mulatta). Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 30:302-307.
19. Lele, S. 1993 Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean difference. Math. Geol. 25:573-602.
20. Lele, S. and T.M. Cole 1996 A new test for shape differences when variance-covariance matrices are unequal. J. Human Evol. 31:193-212.
21. Lele, S. and J.T. Richtsmeier 1991 Euclidean distance matrix analysis: A coordinate free approach to comparing biological shapes using landmark data. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 86:415-428.
22. Martone, V.D., D.H. Enlow, M.G. Hans, B.H. Broadbent, Jr. and O. Oyen 1992 Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type. Angle Orthod. 62: 35-42.
23. Melsen, B. and F. Melsen 1982 The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am. J. Orthod. 82:329-342.
24. Mooney, M.P. and M.I. Siegel 1986 Developmental relationship between premaxillary-maxillary suture patency and anterior nasal spine morphology. Cleft Palate J. 23:101-107.
25. Moyers, R.E. and F.L. Bookstein 1979 The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am. J. Orthod. 75:599-617.
26. Nanda, R.S. and J. Ghosh 1995 Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of the maxilla and mandible. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 107:79-90.
27. Njio, B.J. and I. Kjaer 1993 The development and morphology of the incisive fissure and the transverse palatine suture in the human fetal palate. J. Craniofac. Genet. Devel. Biol. 13:24-34.
28. Rak, D. 1989 Cephalometric analysis in cases with Class III malocclusions. Stomatol. Glas. Srb. 36:277-287.
29. Rohlf, F.J. and D. Slice 1990 Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:40-59.
30. Singh, G.D., J.A. McNamara, Jr. and S. Lozanoff 1997a Morphometry of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. J. Dent. Res. 76:694-703.
31. Singh, G.D., J.A. McNamara, Jr. and S. Lozanoff 1997b Thinplate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Euro. J. Orthod. 19:341-353.
32. Singh, G.D., J.A. McNamara, Jr. and S. Lozanoff 1997c Finite element analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Brit. J. Orthod. 24:103-112.
33. Siriwat, P.P. and J.R. Jarabak 1985 Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod. 55:127-138.
34. Takada, K., S. Petdachai and M. Sakuda 1993 Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: A longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Euro. J. Orthod. 15:211-221.
35. Tanne, K., S. Matsubara and M. Sakuda (1995) Location of the center of resistance for the nasomaxillary complex studied in a three-dimensional finite element model. Br. J. Orthod. 22:227-232.
36. Tollaro, I., T. Baccetti and L. Franchi 1994 Class III malocclusion in the deciduous dentition: a morphological and correlation study. Euro. J. Orthod. 16:401-408.
37. Tollaro, I., T. Baccetti and L. Franchi 1996 Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 109:310-318.
38. Vardimon, A.D., T.M. Graber, J. Stutzmann, L. Voss and A.G. Petrovic 1994 Reaction of the pterygomaxillary fissure and the condylar cartilage to intermaxiallary Class III magnet mechanics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 105:401-413.
39. Williams, S. and C.E. Andersen 1986 The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am. J. Orthod. 89:302-311.
40. Yamada, A. 1990 A study of the relationship between the capacity of oral cavity proper and skeletal malocclusions. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakki Shi 28:203-223.
41. Zeng, X.L. 1993 A study of skeletal types of Class III malocclusion. Chung Hua Kou Chiang Hsueh Tsa Chih 28:170-173.