Histology corresponding to mildly dyskaryotic smears - A study of 190 laser cone biopsied patients

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 193-197

  Risberg, Björn ^a   Andersson, Agneta ^a   Lie, Kathrine A ^b   Nordin, Barbro ^a   Zetterberg, Carina ^a  

^a ÖREBRO MEDICAL CENTRE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE FIXATION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0031895824     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4910     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Richart R M, Wright T C. Controversies in the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 71:1993;1413-1421.
2. O'Sullivan J PO, Ismail S M, Barnes W SF, Deery A RS, Gradwell E, Harvey J A, Husain O AN, Kocjan G, McKee G, Olafsdottir R, Radcliffe N A, Newcombe R G. Interobserver variation in the diagnosis and grading of dyskaryosis in cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists compared with non-specialists. J Clin Pathol. 47:1994;515-518.
3. Creagh T, Bridger J E, Kupek E, Fish D E, Martin-Bates E, Wilkins M J. Pathologists variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Pathol. 48:1995;59-60.
4. Ibrahim S N, Krigman H R, Coogan A C, Wax T D, Dodd L G, Bentley R C, Robboy S J, Johnston W W. Prospective correlation of cervicovaginal cytologic and histologic specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 106:1996;319-324.
5. Joseph M G, Cragg F, Wright V C, Kontozoglou E, Downing P, Marks F R. Cyto-histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: A 1-year prospective study. Diagn Cytopathol. 7:1991;477-481.
6. Joste N E, Crum C P, Cibas E S. Cytologic/histologic correlation for quality control in cervicovaginal cytology-experience with 1582 paired cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 102:1995;32-34.
7. Buxton E J, Luesly D M, Shafi M I, Rollason M. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 98:1991;1273-1276.
8. McCord M L, Stovall T G, Summit R L, Ling F W. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary. Obstet Gynecol. 77:1991;715-719.
9. Andersen E S, Nielsen K, Pedersen B. The reliability of preconization diagnostic evaluation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 59:1995;143-147.
10. Koss L G, Stewart F W, Foote F W, Jordan M J, Bader G M, Day E. Some histological aspects of behaviour of epidermoid carcinoma in situ and related lesions of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 16:1963;1160-1211.
11. Evans D MD, Hudson E A, Brown C L, Boddington M M, Hughes H E, Macenzie E FD, Marshall T. Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the working party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. J Clin Pathol. 39:1986;933-944.
12. Bjørge T, Gunbjørud A B, Langmark F, Skare G B, Thoresen S Ø. Cervical mass screening in Norway- 510 000 smears a year. Cancer Detec Prev. 18:1994;463-470.
13. Meisels A, Fortin R. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix and vagina; l. Cytolytic pattern. Acta Cytol. 20:1976;505-509.
14. Dudding N, Sutton J, Lane S. Koilocytosis; an indication for conservative management. Cytopathology. 7:1996;32-37.
15. Bigrigg M A, Codling B W, Pearson P, Read M D, Swingler G R. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Lancet. 336:1990;229-231.
16. Luesly D, Blomfield P, Dunn J, Shafi M, Chenoy R, Buxton J. Cigarette smoking and histological outcome in women with mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 101:1994;49-52.
17. Cooper P, Kirby A J, Spiegelhalter D J, Whitehead A L, Patterson A. Management of women with a cervical smear showing a mild degree of dyskaryosis: a review of policy. Cytopathology. 3:1992;331-339.
18. Flannelly G, Anderson D, Kitchener H C, Mann E MF, Campell, M, Fisher P, Walker F. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis. Br Med J. 308:1994;1399-1403.
19. Bolger B S, Lewis B V. A prospective study of colposcopy in women with mild dyskaryosis or koilocytosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 95:1988;1117-1119.
20. Giles J A, Deery A, Crow J, Walker P. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 96:1989;1067-1070.
21. Maggi R, Zannoni E, Giorda G, Biraghi P, Sideri M. Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear. Gynecol Oncol. 35:1989;294-296.
22. DiBonito L, Falconieri G, Tomasic G, Colautti I, Bonifacio D, Dudine S. Cervical cytopathology. An evaluation of its accuracy based on cytohistologic comparison. Cancer. 72:1993;3002-3006.
23. Luesly D, Blomfield P, Dunn J, Shafi M, Chenoy R, Buxton J. Cigarette smoking and histological outcome in women with mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 101:1994;49-52.
24. Lonky N M, Navarre G L, Saunders S, Sadeghi M, Wolde-Tsadik G. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 85:1995;716-720.
25. Parazzini F, Sideri M, Restelli S, Schettino F, Chatenoud L, Corsignani P G. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear. Obstet Gynecol. 86:1995;754-757.
26. Jones M H, Jenkins D, Singer A. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CIN III. Cytopathology. 7:1996;17-24.
27. Hopman E H, Voorhorst F J, Kenemans P, Meyer C J, Helmerhorst T J. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. Gynecol Oncol. 58:1995;206-209.
28. Rasbridge S A, Nayagam M. Discordance between cytologic and histologic reports in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - results of a one-year audit. Acta Cytol. 39:1995;648-653.
29. Jarmulowicz M R, Jenkins D, Barton S E, Goodall A L, Holloingworth A, Singer A. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 96:1989;1061-1066.
30. Tidbury P J, Jenkins D. CIN 3 role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:1992;583-586.
31. Hall S, Wu T C, Soudi N, Sherman E. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: predictors of biopsy confirmation. Diagn Cytopathol. 10:1994;3-9.
32. Hirschowitz L, Raffle A E, Mackenzie F D, Hughes A O. Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis. Br Med J. 304:1992;1209-1212.
33. Syrjänen K J. Spontaneous evolution of intraepithelial lesions according to the grade and type of the implicated human papillomavirus (HPV). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 65:1996;43-53.
34. van den Brule A JC, Snijders P JF, Meijer C JLM, Walboomers J MM. PCR based detection of genital HPV genotypes: An update and future perspectives. Papillomavirus Reviews: Current Research on Papillomavirus. 1996;University Press, Leeds. p. 181-188.
35. Tanaka H, Chua K-L, Lindh E, Hjerpe A. Patients with various types of human papillomavirus: covariation and diagnostic relevance of cytological findings in Papanicolau smears. Cytopathology. 4:1993;273-283.