Koilocytosis; an indication for conservative management

Cytopathology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 32-37

  Dudding, N ^a   Sutton, J ^a   Lane, S ^a  

^a LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CINIII; Koilocytosis; Mild dyskaryosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; DYSKARYOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; WART VIRUS;

EID: 0029873819     PISSN: 09565507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.37282372.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Johnson N, Sutton J, Thornton JG et al. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear. Lancet 1993; 342: 91-96.
2. Soutter WP, Wisdom S, Brough AK, Monaghan JM. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy? Br J Obstetric Gynaecol 1986; 93: 70-74.
3. Walker EM, Dodyson J, Duncan ID. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation? Lancet 1986; ii: 672-3.
4. Jones MH, Jenkins D, Cuzick J et al. Mild cervical dyskaryosis - safety of cytological surveillance. Lancet 1992; 339: 1440-3.
5. Kirby AJ, Spiegehalter DJ, Day NE et al. Conservative treatment of mild moderate cervical dyskaryosis - long term outcome. Lancet 1992; 339: 828-31.
6. Cooper P, Kirby AJ, Spiegehalter DJ, Whitehead AL, Patterson A. Management of women with a cervical smear showing a mild degree of dyskaryosis: a review of policy. Cytopath 1992; 3: 331-9.
7. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Guidelines for Clinical Practice and Programme Management March 1992, Duncan ID, ed.
8. Evans DMD, Hudson EA, Brown CL et al. Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: Report of the Working Party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39: 933-44.
9. Ismail SM, Colclough AB, Dinnen JS et al. Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BMJ 1989; 298: 707-10.
10. Robertson AT, Anderson JM, Beck J et al. Observer variability in histopathology reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 231-8.
11. Jenkins D. MD Thesis, University of Bristol 1991.
12. Report of the Intercollegiate Working Party on Cervical Cytology Screening London: Royal College of Obstretricians and Gynaecologists. 1987.
13. Meisels A, Fortin R. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix and vagina; 1. Cytolytic patterns. Acta Cytol 1976; 20: 505-9.
14. Meisels A, Fortin R, Michel R. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix; ii Cytolytic patterns. Acta Cytol 1977; 21: 379-90.
15. Morse A, Wickenden C, Byrne M et al. DNA hybridization of cervical scrapes: comparison with cytological findings in Papanicolaou smears. J Clin Pathol 1941: 296-9.
16. Giles JA, Hudson EA, Crow J, Williams D, Walker P. Colposcopic assessment of the accuracy of cervical cytology screening. BMJ 1988; 296: 1099-102.
17. Munoz N, Bosch FX, Desanjose S et al. The casual link between human papillomavirus and invasive cervical cancer - a population based case-control study in Columbia and Spain. Int J Can 1992; 52(S): 743-9.
18. Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. NEJM 1992; 327: 1272-8.
19. Schiffman MH. Meeting report, 11th International Papillomavirus Workshop 1992: a personal view of the epidemiological presentations.
20. Meijer CJLM, Vanden Brule AJC, Snijders PJF et al. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical scrapes by the polymerase chain reaction in relation to cytology: possible implications for cervical cancer screening. In: Munoz N, Bosch FX, Shah KV, Meheus A, eds. The Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus. Lyon: IARC, 1992.
21. Lorincz AT, Reid R, Jenson JB et al. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 79: 328-37.
22. Tanaka H, Chua KL, Lind E, Hjerpe A. Patients with various types of human papillomavirus: covariation and diagnostic relevance of cytological findings in Papanicolaou smears. Cytopath 1993; 4: 273-83.
23. Byrne P, Woodman C, Meanwell C, Kelley K, Jordan J. Koilocytes and cervical human papillomavirus infection. Letters. Lancet 1986; 1: 205.
24. Sato S, Okayaki T, Clark BA et al. Sensitivity of koilocytosis, immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy as compared to DNA hybridization in detecting human papillomavirus in cervical and vaginal condyloma and intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Pathol 1986; 5: 297-307.
25. Hirschowitz L, Raffle AE, Mackenzie EFD, Hughes AD. Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection in progression to high grade dyskaryosis. BMJ 1992; 304: 1209-12.
26. Mitchell H, Drake M, Medley G. Prospective evaluation of risk of cervical cancer after cytological evidence of human papillomavirus. Lancet 1986; i: 573-5.
27. Anderson MC, Brown CL, Buckley CH et al. Current views on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Pathol 1991; 44: 969-78.
28. Herrington CS. Human papilloma virus (HPV) in gynaecological cytology from molecular biology to clinical testing. Cytopathology 1995; 6: 176-89.