Not guppies, nor goldfish, but tumble dryers, Noriega, Jesse Jackson, panties, car crashes, bird books, and Stevie Wonder

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 143-145

  Storms, Gert ^a   De Boeck, Paul ^a   Van Mechelen, Iven ^a   Ruts, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION THEORY; HUMAN; RATING SCALE; RECALL;

EID: 0031892864     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211377     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. COHEN, B., & MURPHY, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27-58.
2. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1995). Randomization texts (3rd ed.). New York: Dekker.
3. FODOR, J., & LEPORE, E. (1996). The red herring and the pet fish: Why concepts still can't be prototypes. Cognition, 58, 253-270.
4. HAMPTON, J. A. (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition, 15, 55-71.
5. HAMPTON, J. A. (1988). Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model of concept typicality and class inclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 12-32.
6. HAMPTON, J. A. (1991). The combination of prototype concepts. In P. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 91-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. HAMPTON, J. A. (1996). Conjunctions of visually based categories: Overextension and compensation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 378-396.
8. HUTTENLOCHER, J., & HEDGES, L. V. (1994). Combining graded categories: Membership and typicality. Psychological Review, 101, 157-165.
9. JONES, G. V. (1982). Stacks not fuzzy sets: An ordinal basis for prototype theory of concepts. Cognition, 12, 281-290.
10. MEDIN, D. L., & SMITH, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 113-138.
11. MURPHY, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
12. OSHERSON, D. N., & SMITH, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35-58.
13. OSHERSON, D. N., & SMITH, E. E. (1982). Gradedness and conceptual combination. Cognition, 12, 299-318.
14. POSNER, M. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
15. ROSCH, E. H., SIMPSON, C., & MILLER, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 491-502.
16. SMITH, E. E., & OSHERSON, D. N. (1984). Conceptual combination with prototype concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 357-361.
17. STORMS, G., DE BOECK, P., VAN MECHELEN, I., & RUTS, W. (1996). The dominance effect in concept conjunctions: Generality and interaction aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1266-1280.
18. STORMS, G., RUTS, W., & VANDENBROUCKE, A. (1996). Syntactic rephrasing of conceptual conjunctions. Unpublished manuscript. University of Leuven.
19. ZADEH, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information & Computation, 8, 338-353.