Preferences for intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus donor insemination in severe male factor infertility: A preliminary report

Human Reproduction

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 2461-2464

  Schover, L R ^a   Thomas, A J ^a   Miller, K F ^a   Falcone, T ^a   Attaran, M ^a   Goldberg, J ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Donor insemination; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Motivation; Psychological

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FAMILIAL DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; MARRIAGE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 0030458845     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019137     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Braverman, A.M. and Corson, S.L. (1995) Factors related to preferences in gamete donor sources. Fertil. Steril., 63, 543-549.
2. Broderick, P. and Walker, I. (1995) Information access and donated gametes: how much do we know about who wants to know? Hum. Reprod., 10, 3338-3341.
3. Chillon, M., Casals, T., Mercier, B. et al. (1995) Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. N. Engl. J. Med., 332, 1475-1480.
4. Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A. and Murray, C. (1995) Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, 65, 549-559.
5. Golombok, S., Cook, R., Bish, A. and Murray, C. (1995) Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Child Dev., 66, 285-298.
6. Meschede, D., De Geyter, C., Nieschlag, E. and Horst, J. (1995). Genetic risk in micromanipulative assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod., 10, 2880-2886.
7. Oehninger, S., Veeck, L., Lanzendorf, S. et al. (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent primarily upon female and not male factors. Fertil Steril., 64, 977-981.
8. Palermo, G.D., Joris, H., Devroey, P. and Van Steirteghem, A.C. (1992) Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet, 340, 17-18.
9. Palermo, G.D., Cohen, J., Alikani, M. et al. (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility. Fertil. Steril., 63, 1231-1240.
10. Persson, J.W., Peters, G.B. and Saunders, D.M. (1996). Genetic consequences of ICSI: is ICSI associated with risks of genetic disease? Implications for counselling, practice and research. Hum. Reprod., 11, 921-932.
11. Rojo-Moreno, J., Valdemoro, C., Garcia-Merita, M.L. and Tortajada, M. (1996) Analysis of the attitudes and emotional processes in couples undergoing artificial insemination by donor. Hum. Reprod., 11, 294-299.
12. Schover, L.R., Greenhalgh, L.F., Richards, S.I. and Collins, R.L. (1994) Psychological screening and the success of donor insemination. Hum. Reprod., 9, 176-178.
13. Sherins, R.J., Thorsell, L.P., Dorfmann, A. et al (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection facilitates fertilization even in the most severe forms of male infertility: pregnancy outcome correlates with maternal age and number of eggs available. Fertil Steril., 64, 369-375.
14. Silber, S.J. (1995) What forms of male infertility are there left to cure? Hum. Reprod., 10, 503-504.