Stereodeficient subjects show substantial differences in interocular transfer of two motion adaptation aftereffects

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1889-1900

  McColl, Shelley L ^a   Mitchell, Donald E ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aftereffect; Extrastriate; Interocular transfer; Motion; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEROCULAR TRANSFER; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 0031821855     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00326-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Zeki S. A Vision of the Brain. 1993;Blackwell, Oxford.
2. Zeki S.M. Functional specialization in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature. 274:1978;423-428.
3. Burkhalter A., Van Essen D.C. Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 6:1986;2327-2351.
4. Maunsell J.H.R., Van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey: I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed and orientation. J Neurophysiol. 49:1983;1127-1147.
5. Maunsell J.H.R., Van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey: II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol. 49:1983;1148-1167.
6. Roy J.P., Komatsu H., Wurtz R.H. Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST. J Neurosci. 12:1992;2478-2492.
7. Newsome W.T., Pare E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci. 8:1988;2201-2211.
8. Newsome W.T., Britten K.H., Movshon J.A. Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature. 341:1989;52-54.
9. Barlow H.B., Brindley G.S. Interocular transfer of movement aftereffects during pressure blinding of the stimulated eye. Nature. 200:1963;1347.
10. Wade N.J., Swanston M.T., de Weert C.M. On interocular transfer of motion aftereffects. Perception. 22:1993;1365-1380.
11. Raymond J.E. Complete interocular transfer of motion adaptation effects on motion coherence thresholds. Vis Res. 33:1993;1865-1870.
12. Von der Heydt R., Peterhans E., Baumgartner G. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, NY. 224:1984;1260-1262.
13. Von der Heydt R., Peterhans E. Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. J Neurosci. 9:1989;1731-1748.
14. Peterhans E., von der Heydt R. Mechnaisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps. J Neurosci. 9:1989;1749-1763.
15. Paradiso M.A., Shimojo S., Nakayama K. Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects and visual cortical organization. Vis Res. 9:1989;1205-1213.
16. Movshon J.A., Chambers B.E., Blakemore C. Interocular transfer in normal humans and those who lack stereopsis. Perception. 1:1972;483-490.
17. Mitchell D.E., Ware C. Interocular transfer of a visual aftereffect in normal and stereoblind humans. J Physiol. 236:1974;707-721.
18. Banks M.S., Aslin R.N., Letson R.D. Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision. Science. 190:1975;6757.
19. Mann V.A. Different loci suggested to mediate tilt and spiral motion aftereffects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 17:1978;903-909.
20. Mohn G., Van Hof Van Duin J. On the relation of stereoacuity to interocular transfer of the motion and the tilt aftereffects. Vis Res. 23:1983;1087-1096.
21. O'Shea R.P., McDonald A.A., Cumming A., Peart D., Sanderson G., Molteno A.C.B. Interocular transfer of the movement aftereffect in central and peripheral vision of people with strabismus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 35:1994;313-317.
22. von Grunau M.W. Comparison of the effects of induced strabismus on binocularity in area 17 and the LS area in the cat. Brain Res. 246:1982;325-329.
23. Jones K.R., Spear P.D., Tong L. Critical periods for effects of monocular deprivation: differences between striate and extrastriate cortex. J Neurosci. 4:1984;2543-2552.
24. Grant S., Berman N.E. Mechanism of anomalous retinal correspondence: maintenance of binocularity with alteration of receptive-field position in the lateral suprasylvian (LS) visual area of strabismic cats. Vis Neurosci. 7:1991;259-281.
25. Mitchell D.E., Timney B. Postnatal development of function in the mammalian visual system. Darian-Smith I. Handbook of Physiology, Section 1. The Nervous System: Volume 3, Part 1 Sensory Processes. 1984;507-555 American Physiology Society, Bethesda, MD.
26. Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1971.
27. Hess R.F., Wilcox L.M. Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis. Vis Res. 34:1994;2431-2438.
28. Farrell J.E., Pavel M., Sperling G. The visible persistence of stimuli in stroboscopic motion. Vis Res. 30:1990;921-936.
29. Timney B., Symons L.A., Wilcox L.M., O'Shea R.P. The effect of dark and equiluminant occlusion on the interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. Vis Res. 36:1996;707-715.
30. Blake R., Hiris E. Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vis Res. 33:1993;1589-1592.
31. O'Shea R.P., Crassini B. Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vis Res. 21:1981;801-804.
32. Keck M.J., Price R.L. Interocular transfer of the motion aftereffect in strabismus. Vis Res. 22:1982;55-60.
33. Smith A.T., Hammond P. The pattern specificity of velocity aftereffects. Exp Brain Res. 60:1985;71-78.
34. Mitchell D.E., Reardon J., Muir D.W. Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect in normal and stereoblind observers. Exp Brain Res. 22:1975;163-173.
35. Anderson P., Mitchell D.E., Timney B.N. Residual binocular interaction in stereoblind humans. Vis Res. 20:1980;603-611.
36. Wade N.J. On interocular transfer of the movement after-effect in individuals with and without normal binocular vision. Perception. 5:1976;113-118.
37. Nishida S., Ashida H., Sato T. Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test. Vis Res. 34:1994;2707-2716.
38. Raymond J.E. Movement direction analyzers: independence and bandwidth. Vis Res. 33:1993;767-775.
39. Kubova Z., Kuba M., Juran J., Blakemore C. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses. Vis Res. 36:1996;181-190.
40. Dow B.M., Snyder A.Z., Vautin R.G., Bauer R. Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 44:1981;213-228.
41. Van Essen D.C., Newsome W.T., Maunsell J.H.R. The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies and individual variability. Vis Res. 24:1984;429-448.
42. Maunsell J.H.R., Van Essen D.C. Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J Comp Neurol. 266:1987;535-555.
43. Van Essen D.C., Gallant J.L. Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system. Neuron. 13:1994;1-10.
44. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Scale selection for 2nd-order (non-linear) stereopsis. Vis Res. 37:1997;2981-2992.
45. Hess R.F., Demanins R., Bex P.J. A reduced motion aftereffect in strabismic amblyopia. Vis Res. 37:1997;1303-1311.