Regeneration of a Gentiana pneumonanthe population in an oligotrophic wet meadow

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 107-112

  Křenová, Zdeňka ^a   Lepš, Jan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Conservation biology; Critical phase; Disturbance; Gap; Management; Seedling recruitment

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ENDANGERED PLANT; GERMINATION; MANAGEMENT; RECRUITMENT; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT;

CZECH REPUBLIC, BOHEMIA;

GENTIANA PNEUMONANTHE; GENTIANACEAE;

EID: 0030439907     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3236422     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bakker, J.P. 1989. Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Carson, W.P. & Peterson, C.J. 1990. The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia (Berl.) 85: 8-13.
3. Chapman, S.B. & Rose, R.J. 1982. Ecological studies on the marsh gentian (Gentiana pneumonanthe L.). Annual Report, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, section Plant Population Ecology, pp. 74-78.
4. Chapman, S.B., Rose, R.J. & Clarke, R.T. 1989. The behaviour of populations of marsh gentian (Gentiana pneumonanthe L.): modeling approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 1059-1072.
5. Elmes, G.W. & Thomas, J. A. 1992. Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats - interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers. Conserv. 1: 155-169.
6. Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, Chichester.
7. Grubb, P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 52: 107-145.
8. Hvatum, H. 1993. Population biology of the marsh gentian (Gentiana pneumonanthe L.) in Norway. Cand. Scient Thesis, University of Oslo.
9. Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455-1460.
10. Milberg, P. 1994. Germination ecology of the endangered grassland biennial Gentianella campestris. Biol. Conserv. 70: 287-290.
11. Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Den Nijs, J.C.M., Raijmann, L.E.L. & Menken, S.B.J. 1992. Population biology and management of marsh gentian (Gentiana pneumonanthe L.), a rare species in the Netherlands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 108: 117-130.
12. Oostermeijer, J.G.B.,van Eijck, M.W. & den Nijs, J.C.M. 1994a. Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in rare perennial species Gentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae). Oecologia (Berl.)97: 289-296.
13. Oostermeijer, J.G.B., van 't Veer, R. & den Nijs, J.C. M. 1994b. Population structure of rare, long-lived perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe L. in relation to vegetation and management in the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 428-438.
14. Palmer, M.W. 1994. Variation in species richness: toward a unification of hypotheses. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29: 511-530.
15. Pavlovic, N.B. 1994. Disturbance-dependent persistance of rare plants: anthropogenic impacts and restoration implications. In: Bowles, M.L. & Whelan, C.J. (eds.) Restoration of Endangered Species, pp.159-193. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Petanidou, T., den Nijs, J.C.M. & Ellis-Adam, A.C. 1991. Comparative pollination ecology of two rare Dutch Gentiana species, in relation to population size. Acta Honticult. 288: 308-312.
17. Petanidou, T., den Nijs, J.C.M., Oostermeijer, J.G.B. & Ellis-Adam, A.C. 1995. Pollination ecology and patch-dependent reproductive success of rare perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe L. New Phytol. 129: 155-163.
18. Raijmann, L.E.L., van Leeuwen, N.C., Kersten, R., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., den Nijs, H.C.M. & Menken, S.B.J. 1994. Genetical variation and outcrossing rate in relation to population size in Gentiana pneumonanthe L. Conserv. Biol. 8: 1014-1026.
19. Rothmaler, W. 1976. Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD. Kritischer Band. Volk und Wissen, Berlin.
20. Rusch, G. 1988. Reproductive regeneration in grazed and ungrazed limestone grassland communities on Öland. Preliminary results. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 76: 113-124.
21. Rusch, G. & van der Maarel, E. 1992. Species turnover and seedling recruitment in limestone grassland. Oikos 63: 139-146.
22. Salisbury, E.J. 1942. The Reproductive Capacity of Plants. Bell, London.
23. Schaminée, J.H.J., Weeda, E.J. & Westhoff, V. 1995. De vegetatie van Nederland. 2. Plantengemeenschappen van wateren, moerassen en natte heiden. Opulus Press, Uppsala, Leiden.
24. Simmonds, N.W. 1946. Biological Flora of the British Isles, Gentiana pneumonanthe L. J. Ecol. 36: 259-307.
25. Tilman, D. 1993. Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation? Ecology 74: 2179-2191.
26. van der Maarel, E. 1993. Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 733-736.
27. van der Maarel, E. & Sykes, M.T. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 179-188.
28. von Ende, C.N. 1993. Repeated measures analysis: Growth and other time-dependent measures. In: Scheiner, S.M. & Gurevitch, J. (ed.) Design and analysis of ecological experiments, pp. 113-137. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
29. Wilkinson, L. 1988. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc. Evanston, IL.