Models of protein interactions: How to choose one

Folding and Design

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 203-211

  Du, Rose ^a   Grosberg, Alexander Yu ^b   Tanaka, Toyoichi ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b SEMENOV INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Protein folding; Protein potentials

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031746227     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00028-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Vasques, M., Nemethy, G. & Scheraga, H. (1994). Conformational energy calculations on polypeptides and proteins. Chem. Rev. 94, 2183-2239.
2. Levitt, M. (1976). A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 104, 59-107.
3. Ueda, Y., Taketomi, H. & Go, N. (1978). Studies on protein folding, unfolding, and fluctuations by computer simulation. II. A three-dimensional lattice model of lysozyme. Biopolymers 17, 1531-1548.
4. Miyazawa, S. & Jernigan, R.L. (1985). Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18, 534-552.
5. Wilson, C. & Doniach, S. (1989). A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding studies with crambin. Proteins 6, 193-209.
6. Skolnick, J. & Kolinski, A. (1990). Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science 250, 1121-1125.
7. Shakhnovich, E.I., Farztdinov, G.M., Gutin, A.M. & Karplus, M. (1991). Protein folding bottlenecks: a lattice Monte Carlo simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1665-1668.
8. Miyazawa, S. & Jernigan, R. (1996). Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256, 623-644.
9. Kolinski, A., Godzik, A. & Skolnick, J. (1993). A general method for the prediction of the three dimensional structure and folding pathway of globular proteins: application to designed helical proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7420-7433.
10. Hinds, D.A. & Levitt, M. (1994). Exploring conformation space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 243, 668-682.
11. Mirny, L.A. & Shakhnovich, E.I. (1996). How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1164-1179.
12. Fowler, R.H. & Guggenheim, E.A. (1939). Statistical Thermodynamics. MacMillan, New York.
13. Li, H., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. (1997). Nature of driving force for protein folding: a result from analyzing the statistical potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 765-768.
14. Pande, M.S., Grosberg, A.Y. & Tanaka, T. (1995). How accurate must potentials be for successful modeling of protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 9482-9491.
15. Wolynes, P.G. (1997). As simple as can be? Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 871-874.
16. Heinz, D.W., Baase, W.A. & Matthews, B.W. (1992). Folding and function of a T4 lysozyme containing 10 consecutive alanines illustrates the redundancy of information in an amino acid sequence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 3751-3755.
17. Regan, L. & Degrado, W.F. (1988). Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science 241, 976-978.
18. Kamteker, S., Schiffer, J.M., Xiong, H., Babik, J.M. & Hecht, M.H. (1993). Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acid sequences. Science 262, 1680-1685.
19. Davidson, A.R. & Sauer, R.T. (1995). Folded proteins occur frequently in libraries of random amino acid sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2146-2150.
20. Davidson, A.R., Lumb, K.J. & Sauer, R.T. (1995). Cooperatively folded proteins in random sequence libraries. Nat Struct. Biol. 2, 856-864.
21. Riddle, D.S., et al., & Baker, D. (1997). Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 805-809.
22. Shakhnovich, E.I. (1997). Theoretical studies of protein-folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 29-40.
23. Pande, V.S., Grosberg, A.Y., Tanaka, T. & Rokhsar, D.S. (1998). Pathways for protein folding: is a new view needed? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 68-79.
24. Goldstein, R.A., Lutheyschulten, Z.A. & Wolynes, P.G. (1992). Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4918-4922.
25. Garel, T., Orland, H. & Thirumalai, D. (1996). Analytical Theories of Protein Folding. In Recent Developments in Theoretical Studies of Proteins. (Eiber, R., ed.), pp.197-268. World Scientific, Singapore.
26. Pande, M.S., Grosberg, A.Y. & Tanaka, T. (1997). Statistical mechanics of simple models of protein folding and design. Biophys. J. 73, 3192-3210.
27. Pande, V.S., Grosberg, A.Y. & Tanaka, T. (1998). Heteropolymer freezing and design: towards physical models of protein folding. Rev. Mod. Phys., in press.
28. Lau, K.F. & Dill, K.A. (1989). A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins. Macromolecules 22, 3986-3997.
29. Obukhov, S.P. (1990). Polymer chain in disordered media. Phys. Rev. A 42, 2015-2019.
30. Garel, T., Leibler, L. & Orland, H. (1994). Random hydrophilichydrophobic copolymers. J. Phys. II (France) 4, 2139-2148.
31. Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. (1996). Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273, 666-669.