Comparative karyotype of pig and cattle using whole chromosome painting probes

Hereditas

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 257-263

  Schmitz, A ^a   Oustry, A ^b   Vaiman, D ^b   Chaput, B ^a   Frelat, G ^a   Cribiu, E P ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE   (France)

^b Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; METAPHASE; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SWINE; SYNTENY;

BOS TAURUS; BOVINAE; MAMMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0031696905     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1998.00257.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bahri-Darwich I, Cribiu EP, Berland HM and Darré R, (1993). A new translocation in Blonde d'Aquitaine cattle, rob(4:10). Genet. Sel. Evol. 25: 413-419.
2. Bruch J, Rettenberger G, Leeb T, Meier-Ewert S, Klett C, Brenig B and Hameister H, (1996). Mapping of type I loci from human chromosome 7 reveals segments of conserved synteny on pig chromosomes 3, 9, and 18. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 73: 164-167.
3. Chowdhary BP, Fronicke L, Gustavsson I and Scherthan H, (1996). Comparative analysis of the cattle and human genomes: detection of ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm. Genome 7: 297-302.
4. Fronicke L, Chowdhary BP, Scherthan H and Gustavsson I, (1996). A comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm. Genome 7: 285-290.
5. Goureau A, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Riquet J, Milan D, Pinton P, Frelat G and Gellin J, (1996). Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting. Genomics 36: 252-262.
6. Gray JW, (1989). Flow Cytogenetics. Academic Press. New York.
7. Hadano S, Watanabe M, Yokoi H, Kogi M, Kondo I, Tsuchiya H, Kanazawa I, Wakasa K and Ikeda J, (1991). Laser microdissection and single unique primer per allow generation of regional chromosome DNA clones from a single human chromosome. Genomics 11: 364-373.
8. Hameister H, Klett C, Bruch J, Dixkens C, Vogel W and Christensen K, (1997). Zoo-FISH analysis: the American mink (Mustela vison) closely resembles the cat karyotype. Chromosome Res 5: 5-11.
9. Hayes H, (1995). Chromosome painting with human chromosome specific DNA libraries reveals the extent and the distribution of conserved segments in bovine chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 71: 168-174.
10. Hoebee B, de Stoppelaar JM, Suijkerbuijk RF and Monard S, (1994). Isolation of rat chromosome-specific paint probes by bivariate flow sorting followed by degenerate oligonucleotide primed-PCR. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 66: 277-282.
11. Johnson DH, (1990). Molecular cloning of DNA from specific chromosomal regions by microdissection and sequence independent amplification of DNA. Genomics 6: 243-251.
12. Milan D, Riquet J, Yerle M, Goureau A, Schmitz A, Cribiu EP, Frelat G and Gellin J, (1996). Homologous and heterologous FISH painting with PARM-PCR chromosome-specific probes in mammals. Mamm. Genome 7: 194-199.
13. Milan D, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Chaput B, Vaiman M, Frelat G and Gellin J, (1993). A PCR-based method to amplify DNA with random primers: determining the chromosomal content of porcine flow-karyotype peaks by chromosome painting. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 62: 139-141.
14. Novacek MJ, (1992). Mammalian phyloneny: shaking the tree. Nature 356: 121-125.
15. Popescu CP, Long S, Riggs P, Womack J, Schmutz S, Fries R and Gallagher DS, (1996). Standardization of cattle karyotype nomenclature: Report of the committee for the standardization of the cattle karyotype. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 74: 259-261.
16. Rabbitts P, Impey H, Heppell-Parton A, Langford C, Tease C, Lowe N, Bailey D, Ferguson-Smith M and Carter N, (1995). Chromosome specific paints from a high resolution flow karyotype of the mouse. Nat. Genet. 9: 369-375.
17. Raudsepp T, Fronicke L, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I and Chowdhary BP, (1996). Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man. Chromosome Res. 4: 218-225.
18. Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Bruch J, Just W, Vogel W and Hameister H, (1995a). ZOO-FISH analysis: cat and human karyotypes closely resemble the putative ancestral mammalian karyotype. Chromosome Res. 3: 479-486.
19. Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Kunz J, Vogel W and Hameister H, (1995b). Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting. Genomics 26: 372-378.
20. Rettenberger G, Bruch J, Fries R, Archibald AL and Hameister H, (1996). Assignment of 19 porcine type I loci by somatic cell hybrid analysis detects new regions of conserved synteny between human and pig. Mamm. Genome 7: 275-279.
21. Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier HU, Lima-de-Faria A and Fronicke L, (1994). Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat. Genet. 6: 342-347.
22. Schmitz A, Chardon P, Gainche I, Chaput B, Guilly MN, Frelat G and Vaiman M, (1992). Pig standard bivariate flow karyotype and peak assignment for chromosomes X, Y, 3 and 7. Genomics 14: 357-362.
23. Schmitz A, Oustry A, Chaput B, Yerle M, Milan D, Frelat G and Cribiu EP, (1995). The bovine bivariate flow karyotype and peak idenlificalion by chromosome painting with PCR-generated probes. Mamm. Genome 6: 415-420.
24. Solinas-Toldo S, Lengauer C and Fries R, (1995). Comparative genome map of human and cattle. Genomics 27: 489-496.
25. Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjöld M, Ponder BAJ and Tunnacliffe A, (1992). Degenerate oligonucleotide primer PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerale primer. Genomics 13: 718-725.
26. Yang F, Muller S, Jusl R, Ferguson-Smith MA and Weinberg J, (1997). Comparative chromosome painting in mammals: human and the Indian muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis). Genomics 39: 396-401.