Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: Effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 140-145

  Marbella, Anne M ^a   Desbiens, Norman A ^b   Mueller Rizner, Nancy ^b   Layde, Peter M ^b  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FAMILY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSE TRAINING; PATIENT CARE; PROGNOSIS; RESUSCITATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TIME;

EID: 0031667090     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9441(98)90018-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association: Good care of the dying patient. JAMA 275:474-478, 1996
2. Dubler NN: Commentary: Balancing life and death - Proceed with caution. Am J Public Health 83:23-25, 1993
3. Sonnenblick M, Rosin A: Do not resuscitate - Decision making. Isr J Med Sci 30:720-725, 1994
4. Chicago Tribune: Perspective. Death: Who has the last word? February 2, 1997
5. Cammer Paris BE, Carrion VG, Meditch JS, et al: Roadblocks to do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med 153:1689-1695, 1993
6. Hare J, Pratt C, Nelson C: Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Arch Intern Med 152:1049-1054, 1992
7. Seckler AB, Meier DE, Mulvihill M, et al: Substituted judgment: How accurate are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med 115:92-98, 1991
8. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA, Cain KC: Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. J Gerontol 43:M115-M121, 1988
9. Zweibel NR, Cassel CK: Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist 29:615-621, 1989
10. Sonnenblick M, Friedlander Y, Steinberg A: Dissociation between the wishes of terminally ill parents and decisions by their offspring. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:599-604, 1993
11. Emanuel EE, Weinberg DS, Gonin R, et al: How well is the Patient Self-Determination Act working?: An early assessment. Am J Med 95:619-628, 1993
12. Teno JM, Hakim RB, Knaus WA, et al: Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. J Gen Intern Med 10:179-186, 1995
13. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. JAMA 274:1591-1598, 1995
14. Layde PM, Beam CA, Broste SK, et al: Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences. Arch Fam Med 4:518-524, 1995
15. Lynn J, Knaus WA: Background for SUPPORT. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1S-4S, 1990
16. Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J: Study population in SUPPORT. J Clin Epidemiol 43:11S-28S, 1990
17. Wu AW, Damiano AM, Lynn J, et al: Predicting future functional status for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 122:342-350, 1995
18. Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, et al: The SUPPORT prognostic model: Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 122:191-202, 1995
19. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG: Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Norwalk, CN, Appleton & Lange, 1990
20. Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY, Wiley, 1981
21. SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, ed 4, Vol 1. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 1989
22. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Pollock BG: Regression models in clinical studies: Determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:1198-1202, 1988
23. Forrow L: The green eggs and ham phenomena. Hastings Center Report 24:S29-S32, 1994