Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 24, 1998, Pages 3883-3898

  Lidén, Lars ^a   Mingolla, Ennio ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aperture problem; Monocular; Motion; Occlusion; Terminators

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0031664829     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00083-2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rubin E. Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren [Wertheimer M, English Trans.; Collett P, German Trans.]. Gyldendalske, Copenhagen, 1921. Original work published 1915, pp 35-101.
2. Rubin E. Figure and ground. In: Beardslee D, Wertheimer M, editors. Readings in Perception. New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand, 1958:194-203.
3. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1935.
4. Coren S. Brightness contrast as a function of figure-ground relations. J Exp Psychol 1969;80:517-24.
5. Nakayama K, Shimojo S. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 1992;257:1357-63.
6. Wallach H. Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung. Psychol Forsch 1935;20:325-80.
7. Wuerger S, Shapley R, Rubin N. 'On the visually perceived direction of motion' by Hans Wallach: 60 years later. Perception 1996;25:1317-67.
8. Shimojo S, Silverman G, Nakayama K. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Vis Res 1989;29(5):619-26.
9. Lorenceau J, Shiffrar M. The influence of terminators on motion integration across space. Vis Res 1992;32(2):263-73.
10. Shiffrar M, Lorenceau J. Increased motion linking across edges with decreased luminance contrast, edge width and duration. Vis Res 1996;36(14):2061-7.
11. Watamaniuk S, McKee S. Seeing motion behind occluders. Nature 1995;377:729-30.
12. Rubin N, Hochstein S. Isolating the effect of one-dimensional motion signals on the perceived direction of moving two-dimensional objects. Vis Res 1993;33(10):1385-96.
13. Guzman A. Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies. In: Grasselli A, editor. Automatic Interpretation and Classification of Images. New York: Academic Press, 1969:243-76.
14. Rubin N. A crucial role for L-junctions and T-junctions in the perception of modal and amodal completion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci: ARVO Abstr Suppl 1997;38:991.
15. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 1965;7:308-13.
16. Shimojo S, Nakayama K. A modal representation of occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence. Perception 1990;19(3):285-99.
17. Watanabe T, Cavanagh P. Surface decomposition accompanying the perception of transparency. Spat Vis 1993;7(2):95-111.
18. Ramachandran V, Anstis S. Figure-ground segregation modulates apparent motion. Vis Res 1986;26(12):1969-75.
19. Ramachandran V, Inada V, Kiama G. Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion. Vis Res 1986;26(10):1741-9.
20. Watanabe T, Cole R. Propagation of local motion correspondence. Vis Res 1995;35(20):2853-61.
21. Cavanagh P. Reconstructing the third dimension: interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1987;37:171-95.
22. Anderson B, Julesz B. A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis. Psychol Rev 1995;102(4):705-43.
23. Grossberg S. Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures. Psychol Rev 1997;104(3):618-58.
24. McDermott J, Weiss Y, Adelson E. Surface perception and motion integration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci: ARVO Abstr Suppl 1997;38:237.
25. Vallortigara G, Bressan P. Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion. Vis Res 1991;31(11):1967-78.
26. Gurnsey R, Grunau M. Illusory contour-motion arising from translating terminators. Vis Res 1997;37(8):1007-24.
27. Watanabe T, Oyama T. Are illusory contours a cause or a consequence of apparent differences in brightness and depth in the Kanizsa square? Perception 1988;17(4):513-21.
28. Shipley T, Kellman P. Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Percep Psychophys 1992;52(1):97-106.
29. Stoner G, Duncan R, Albright T. Stereo-based terminator classification affects area MT responses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci: ARVO Abstr Suppl 1997;38:918.
30. Maunsell J, Newsome W. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 1987;10:363-401.
31. Maunsell J, Van Essen D. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol 1983;49(5):1148-67.
32. Mishkin M, Ungerleider L, Macko K. Object vision an spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci 1983;6:414-7.
33. Schiller P, Logothetis N. The color-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system. Trends Neurosci 1990;13:392-8.
34. Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988;240:740-9.
35. DeYoe E, Van Essen D. Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends Neurosci 1988;11:219-26.
36. von der Heydt R, Peterhans E, Baumgartner G. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science 1984;224:1269-72.
37. Grossberg S. Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form? Percept Psychophys 1991;49(2):117-41.
38. Francis G, Grossberg S. Cortical dynamics of form and motion integration: persistence, apparent motion, and illusory contours. Vis Res 1996;36(1):149-73.
39. Lidén L, Mingolla E, Watanabe T. Factors influencing motion integration across visual space. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci: ARVO Abstr Suppl 1997;38:77.
40. Croner L, Albright T. Image segmentation enhances discrimination of motion in visual noise. Vis Res 1997;37(11):1415-27.
41. Watanabe T. Velocity decomposition and surface decomposition-reciprocal interactions between motion and form processing. Vis Res 1997;37(20):2879-89.
42. He Z, Nakayama K. Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion. Vis Res 1994;34(16):2125-35.