Environmental continuity - An ambiguous concept in Swedish environmental conservation.;Kontinuitet - Ett mångtydigt begrepp

Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 33-36

  Appelqvist, Thomas ^a   Nordén, Björn ^b  

^a Stiftelsen ProNatura   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTINUITY; INDICATOR SPECIES;

SWEDEN;

BRYOPHYTA; FUNGI; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 0031663078     PISSN: 0039646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Ahnlund, H. 1997: Skydd eller skötsel - replik angående betydelsen av kontinuitet och substrattillgång för krävande vedinsekter. Ent. Tidskr. 118: 53-54.
2. Aronsson, M., Hallingbäck, T. & Mattsson, J.-E. (red)1995: Rödlistade växter i Sverige 1995. ArtDatabanken, Uppsala.
3. Arup, U., Ekman, S., Kärnefelt, I. & Mattsson, J.-E. (red) 1997: Skyddsvärda lavar i sydvästra Sverige. SBFförlaget, Lund.
4. Arvidsson, L., Lindström, M., Muhr, L.-E., Stähl, B. & Wall, S. 1988: Lavfloran i Näverkärrsskogen i Bohuslän. SvenskBot. Tidskr. 82: 167-192.
5. Begon, M., Harper, J. L. & Townsend, C. R. 1996: Ecology. Third edition. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.
6. Bierzychudek, P. 1982: Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. New Phytologist 90: 757-776.
7. Bohlin, A., Gustafsson L. & Hallingbäck T. 1977: Skirmossan, Hookeria lucens, i Sverige. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 71: 273-284.
8. Brown, J. H. 1984: On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Amer. Nat. 124: 255-279.
9. Brunei, J. 1993: Environmental and historical factors limiting the distribution of rare forest grasses in South Sweden. For. Ecol. and Managern. 61: 263-275.
10. Brunei, J. 1994: Der Einflu von Waldnutzung und Waldgeschichte auf die Vegetation südschwedischer Laubwälder. Norddeut. Naturschutz Akad. Berichte 7 (3): 96-101.
11. Cooke, R. C. & Rayner, A. D. M. 1984: Ecology of saprotrophic fungi. Longman Group, London.
12. Delin, A. 1992: Kärlväxter i taigan i Hälsingland - deras anpassningar till kontinuitet eller störning. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 147-176.
13. Diekmann, M. 1995: Use and improvement of Ellenberg's indicator values in deciduous forests of the Boreo-nemoral zone in Sweden. Ecography 18: 178-189.
14. During, H, J. 1979: Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia 5: 2-18.
15. During, H, J. 1992: Ecological classification of bryophytes and lichens. I J. W. Bates & A. M. Farmer (red), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment: 1-31. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Dzwonko, Z. & Loster, S. 1992: Species richness and seed dispersal to secondary woods in southern Poland. J. Biogeogr. 19: 195-204.
17. Eriksson, O. 1996: Population ecology and conservation - some theoretical considerations with examples from the Nordic flora. Symb. Bot. Ups. 31 (3): 159-167.
18. Eriksson, 0.1997: Se sa mânga blommor som redan slagit ut pâ ängen. Fauna & flora 92 (3): 17-24.
19. Eriksson, O., Ehrlén, J., Telenius, A. & Fröborg, H. 1995: Dynamik och abundans hos fältskiktsarter i lunden pâ Tullgarnsnäs, Södermanland. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 89: 91-107.
20. Frey, W. & Hensen, 1.1995: Lebensstrategien bei Pflanzen: ein Klassifizierungsvorschlag. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117: 187-209.
21. Fritz, Ö. & Larsson, K. 1997: Betydelsen av skoglig kontinuitet för rödlistade lavar. En Studie av halländsk bokskog. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 90: 241-262.
22. Gaudet, C. L. & Keddy, P. A. 1988: A comparative approach to predicting competetive ability from plant traits. Nature 334: 242-243.
23. Gauslaa, Y. & Ohlson, M. 1997: Et historisk perspektiv pâ kontinuitet og forekomst av epifyttiske laver i norske skoger. Blyttia 55: 15-27.
24. Gilbert, O. L. 1984: Some effects of disturbance on the lichen flora of oceanic hazel woodland. Lichenologist 16: 21-30.
25. Coward, T. 1995: Nephroma occultum and the maintenance of lichen diversity in British Columbia. Mitteil. Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Sclmee Landxh. 70:93-101.
26. Grime, J. P. 1974: Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250: 26-31.
27. Grime, J. P. 1977: Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plant and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer. Nat. Ill: 1169-1194.
28. Grime, J. P. 1979: Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
29. Grime, J. P, Hodgson, J. G. & Hunt, R. 1988: Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London.
30. Grime, J. P., Rincon, E. R. & Wickerson, B. E. 1990: Bryophytes and plant strategy theory. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104: 175-186.
31. Gustafsson, L. 1994: A comparision of biological characteristics and distribution between Swedish threatened and non-threatened forest vascular plants. Ecography 17: 39-19.
32. Hale, M. E. Jr. 1983: The biology of lichens. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.
33. Hallingbäck, T. 1989: Metzgeria fruticulosa in Fennoscandia - and its ecology in Sweden. Lindbergia 15: 205-212.
34. Hallingbäck, T. 1991: Mossor som indikerar skyddsvärd skog. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 85: 321-332.
35. Hallingbäck, T. 1994: Ekologisk katalog over storsvampar. Naturvârdsverket Rapport 4313. I Databanken for hotade arter, Uppsala.
36. Hallingbäck, T. 1995: Ekologisk katalog over lavar. Statens Natiin'ardsverk Rapport 44111 ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
37. Hallingbäck, T. 1996: Ekologisk katalog over mossor. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
38. Hallingbäck, T. & Weibull, H. 1996: En värdepyramid av mossor for naturvardsbedömning av ädellövskog. Sveiuk Bot. Tidskr. 90: 129-140.
39. Hanski, I., Kouki, J. & Halkka, A. 1993: Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. I R. E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter (red), Species diversity in ecological communities: 108-116. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
40. Hansson, L., Söderström, L. & Solbreck, C. 1992: The ecology of dispersal in relation to conservation. I L. Hansson (red), Ecological principles of nature conservation: 162-200. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
41. Hedenas, L. & Lofroth, M. 1992: Mossor som indikerar särskilt skyddsvärda vâtmarksbiotoper. Sveiuk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 375-389.
42. Herben, T. & Söderström, L. 1992: Which habitat parameters are most important for the persistence of a bryophyte species on patchy, temporal substrates? Biol. Conserv. 59: 121-126.
43. Holmer, L. 1996: Interspecific interactions beftveen woodInhabiting basidiomycetes in boreal forests. Avhandling. Inst f skoglig mykologi, SLU, Uppsala.
44. Hultengren, S. & Norden, B. & 1996: Blylav, Degelia plumbea - ekologi och aktuell utbredning i sydvästra Sverige. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 90: 1-9.
45. Johnson, C. N. 1996: Interactions between mammals and ectomycprrhizal fungi. Trends Ecol. EveJ. 11:503-507.
46. Karlsson, T. 1998: Förteckning Over svenska kärlväxter. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 91: 241-560.
47. Karström, M. 1992: Sieget fore - en presentation. Svensk Botanisk Tidskr. 86: 103-114.
48. Keddy, P. A. & Shipley, B. 1989: Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54: 234-241.
49. Kers, L. E. 1972: De svenska utpostlokalerna for Stellaria nemorum L. ssp. glochidisperma Murb. Svensk Botanisk Tidskr. 66: 113-131.
50. Kers, L. E. 1976: Floristiska metoder att bedöma ett bestânds kontinuitet.IC. Ehrenberg & U. Gullberg (red), Skogliga genresnrser, symposium pä Ultima 4-5 Oktober 1976: 81-91. Inst for skogsgenetik, Ultuna.
51. Kers, L. E. 1977: Floristiska metoder att bedöma ett bestânds kontinuitet. Rapporter och Uppsatser Nr 24 (Skogslwgskolan). Insl.f. Skogsgenetik. Stockholm.
52. Kers, L. E. 1997: Elaphomyces virgatosporus funnen i Sverige. Svensk Botanisk Tidskr. 91: 25-36.
53. Kruys, N. & Jonsson, B. G. 1997: Insular patterns of calicioid lichens in a boreal old-growth forest-wetland mosaic. Ecography 20: 605-613.
54. Longton, R. E. 1997: Reproductive biology and life-history strategies. Advances in Bryology 6: 65-101.
55. Mills, L. S., Soûlé, M. E. & Doak, D. F. 1993: The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation Bioscience 43:219-224.
56. Mägdefrau, K. 1982: Life forms of Bryophytes I A J E Smith (red), Bryophyte ecology: 45-58. Chapman & Hall, London.
57. Niemelä, J. 1997: Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11: 601-610.
58. Nilsson, S. G. & Baranowski, R. 1994: Indikatorer pâ jätteträdskontinuitet - svenska fbrekomster av knäppare som är beroende av grova, levande trad. Ent. Tidskr. 7/5:81-97.
59. Nilsson, S. G., Baranowski, R. & Hedin, J. 1997: Var kan en artrik lövskog âterskapas? Ent. Tidskr. 118: 54-57.
60. Nitare, J. & Norén, M. 1992: Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i ett nytt projekt vid Skogsstyrelsen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 219-226.
61. Norden, B. 1994: Strutskinnlav, Leptogium comiculatum, i sydvästra Sverige. En aterinventering av en stenlevande lav med blagrönalger. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 88: 75-81.
62. Norden, B. 1997: Genetic variation within and among populations of Fomitopsis pinicola (Basidiomycetes). Nord. J. Bot. 17: 319-329.
63. Noss, R. F. 1990: Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355-364.
64. Ohlson, M., Söderström, L., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O. & Hermansson, J. 1997: Habitat qualities versus longterm continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv. 81:221-231.
65. Oksanen, L. & Ranta, E. 1992: Plant strategies along mountain vegetation gradients: a test of two theories. J.Veg.Sci.3: 175-186.
66. Olsson, G. A. (red) 1993: Indikatorarter for identifiering av naturskogar i Norrbotten. Natnn-ardsverket Rapport 4276.
67. Peterken, G. F. & Game, M. 1981: Historical factors affecting the distribution of Mercurialis perennis in central Lincolnshire. J. Eco!. 69: 781-796.
68. Peterken, G. F. & Game, M. 1984: Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J. Ecol. 72: 155-182.
69. Petterson, B. 1994: Steget fore. En litteratursammanställning. Rödbläran 6 (3/4): 20-47.
70. Rabinowitz, D. 1981: Seven forms of rarity. I H. Synge (red), The biological aspects of rare plant conservation: 205-217. Wiley, Chichester.
71. Raunkir, C. 1904: Om biologiske typer, med hensyn til planternes tilpasning til at overleve ugunstige aarstider. Bot. Tidsskr. 26: XIV.
72. Renhom, K.-E. & Esseen, P.-A. 1995: Biomass growth in five Alectorioid lichen epiphytes. Mitt. Eidgenöss. Forsch, ant. Wald Schnee Landsch. 70: 133-140.
73. Rogers, R. W. 1990: Ecological strategies of lichens. Lichenologist 22: 149-162.
74. Rose, F. 1974: The epiphytes of oak. 7M. G. Morris & F. H. Perring (red), TheBritiskoak; its history and natural history: 250-273. Classey, Faringdon.
75. Rose, F. 1976: Lichenological indicators of age and environmental continuity in woodlands.ID. H. Brown, D. L. Hawksworth & R. H. Bailey (red), Lichenology: progress and problems: 279-307. Academic Press, London.
76. Rose, F. 1985: The old forests of Western Europe and their epiphytic lichens. Brit. Lieh. Soc. Bull. 56: 1-8.
77. Rose, F. 1988: Phytogeographical and ecological aspects of Lobarion communities in Europe. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 69-79.
78. Rose, F. 1990: The epiphytic (corticolous and lignicolous) lichen flora of the Forêt de Fontainebleau. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 137: Lettres bot. 197-209.
79. Rose, F. 1992: Temperate forest management: its effects on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. I J. W. Bates & A. M. Farmer (red), Bryophytes and Lichens in a changing environment: 211-233. Clarendon press, Oxford.
80. Rose, F. & James, P. W. 1974: Regional studies on the british lichen flora. 1: The corticolous and lignicolous species of the New Forest, Hampshire. Tlie Lichcnologist 6: 1-72.
81. Rundlöf, U. & Nilsson, S. G. 1995: Fern Ess metoden. Spâra skyddsvärd skog i södra Sverige. Naturskyddsföreningens förlag, Helsingborg.
82. Rydberg, H. 1997: Knappnâlslavar pâ gamla ekar i Södermanland - status och naturvârdsâtgarder. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 91: 39-57.
83. Salomonson, A. 1993: Nutrient use and growth of the forest herbs Actaea spicata and Geranium sylvaticum. Dissertations in Forest Vegetation Ecology 6, SLU, Umeå
84. Sinclair, A. R. E., Hik, D. S., Schmilz, O. J., Scudder, G. G. E., Turpin, D. H. & Larter, N. C. 1995: Biodiversity and the need for habitat renewal. Ecol. Applic. 5: 579-587.
85. Southwood T. R. E. 1977: Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J. Anitn. Ecol. 46: 337-365.
86. Southwood T. R. E. 1988: Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52: 3-18.
87. Söderström, L. 1988: Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferious wood in northern Sweden. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 89-97.
88. Söderström, L. & Herben, T. 1997: Dynamics of bryophyte metapopulations. Advances in Bryology 6: 205-240.
89. Söderström, L. & Jonsson, B. G. 1992: Naturskogamas fragmentering och mossor pâ temporära substrat. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.86: 185-198.
90. Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W. & Loehle, C. 1990: On the relationships between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58: 239-250.
91. Tibell, L. 1992: Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nord. J. Bot. 12: 427-450.
92. van der Maarel, E. & Sykes, M. T. 1993: Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 179-188.
93. Vesterholt J. 1991: Knold-sl0rhatte (Cortinarius undersla;gt Phlegmacium) som indikatorarter for en type vrdifulde 10vskovslokaliteter. Svampe 24: 27-48.
94. Willis, K. J. 1993: How old is ancient woodland? Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 427-428.
95. Ås, S. 1993: Are habitat islands islands? Woodliving beetles (Coleoptera) in deciduous forest fragments in boral forests. Ecograpliy 16: 219-228.
96. Økland, B. 1994: Mycetophilidae (Diptera), an insect group vulnerable to forest practices - A comparision of clear-cut, managed and seminatural spruce forests in southern Norway. Biodiv. and Conserv. 3: 68-85.
97. Økland, B., Bakke, A., Hägvar, S. & Kvamme, T. 1996: What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiv. and Conserv. 5: 75-100.