Screening mammography in an integrated health care system: The Kaiser Permanente experience

Breast Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 45-53

  Somkin, Carol P ^a   Hiatt, Robert A ^b  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031658715     PISSN: 08886008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/BD-1998-103-407     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: An unrealized potential. CA Cancer J Clin 1987; 37:33-48.
2. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Last 1993; 85:1644-1656.
3. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:1015-1026.
4. Kerlikowske K, Deborah G, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster V. Efficacy of screening mammography: A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995; 273(2):149-154.
5. Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH, Smith RA, Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49. Cancer 1995; 75(7):1619-1626.
6. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenberg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of direction for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997; 80:22091-2099.
7. Ernster V. Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49 - A guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making. Am J Public Health 1997; 87:1103-1106.
8. Eastman P. NCI adopts new mammography screening guidelines for women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:538-540.
9. Leitch AM, Dodd GD, Costanza MC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines fo rthe early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 47:150-153.
10. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996; 40:37-51.
11. Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:62-67.
12. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and pap smear screening in U.S. women. Am J Public Health 1993; 83:53-60.
13. Rimer B. Mammography use in the U.S.: trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med 1994; 16:317-326.
14. Rimer BK. Interventions to increase breast screening. Lifespan and ethnicity issues. Cancer 1994; 74:323-328.
15. Taplin SH, Montano DE. Attitudes, age, and participation in mammographic screening: a prospective analysis. J Am Board Fam Pract 1993; 6:13-23.
16. Hiatt RA, Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: Adherence to cancer screening advice. Prev Med 1997; 26:S11-S18.
17. Curry S, Emmons K. Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Behav Med 1994; 16:302-316.
18. Zapka J, Estabrook B. Breast and cervical cancer: early detection and control. Wellness Perspectives 1995; 11:40-78.
19. Solberg L, Kottke T, Brekke M, Calomeni C, Conn S, Davidson G. Using continuous quality improvement to increase preventive services in clinical practice - going beyond guidelines. Prev Med 1996; 25:259-267.
20. Curpen BN, Sickles EA, Solitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Prankel SD. The coparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old. AJR 1995; 164:1099-1103.
21. Tabar L, Eaberberg G, Day NE, Holmberg L. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examination? - An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer 1987; 55:547-551.
22. Linver MN, Osuch JR, Brenner RJ, Smith RA. The mammography audit: a primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA). AJR 1995; 165:19-25.
23. Smith R, Osuch JR, Linver M. A national breast cancer database. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1247-1257.
24. McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK, Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Johnson CC. Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer 1996; 77:2070-2076.
25. McCarthy B, Yood M, Boohaker E, Ward R, Rebner M, Johnson C. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Am J Prev Med 1996; 12:282-288.
26. Katz SJ, Hislop G, Thomas DB, Larson EB. Delay from symptom to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in Washington State and British Columbia. Med Care 1993; 31 (3):264-268.
27. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Perez-Stable EJ, et al. Pathways to early cancer detection in the multiethnic population of the San Francisco Bay Area-Health Education Quarterly 1996; 23:s10
28. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. Mountain View,CA, Mayfield; 1991.
29. Gielen AC, McDonald EM. The PRECEDE-PROCEED planning model. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B, K (eds). Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1997, pp 359-383.
30. Walsh J, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: An analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Education Quarterly 1992; 19:157-175.
31. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:703-710.
32. Selby JV. Linking automated databases for research in managed care settings. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:719-724.
33. Durham ML. Prospects and problems in using data from HMOs for the study of aging populations and their health care needs. The GerontolOgist 1994; 34:481-485.
34. Dorsay RH, Somkin CP, Gruskin EP, Larkin M. Is screening worthwhile in women 40-49 years of age? 1998; (in preparation).
35. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rpid-throughput mammography screening practice: Methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:323-327.
36. Rosenberg R, Lando J, Hunt W, et al. The New Mexico mammography project. Cancer 1996; 78:1731-1739.
37. Rosenberg R, Lando J, Hunt W, et al. The New Mexico Mammography Project. Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993. Cancer 1996; 78:1731-1739.
38. Somkin CP, Hurley LB, Fireman BF, Gruskin EP. Sociodemographic factors and mammography use in a health maintenance organization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, October 1994.
39. Somkin CP, Hiatt RA, Hurley LB, Gruskin EP, Ackerson L, Larson P. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:1658-1664.
40. Curry SJ, Taplin SH, Anderman C, Barlow WE, McBride C. A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening. Prev Med 1993; 22:350-360.
41. McPhee SJ, Detmer WM. Office-based interventions to improve delivery of cancer prevention services by primary care physicians. Cancer 1993; 72:1100-1112.
42. Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer [see comments]. J Fam Pract 1995; 40:162-171.
43. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Fordham D. Promoting cancer screening: a randomized, controlled trial of three interventions. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149:1866-1872.
44. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 1991; 266:538-544.
45. Wolosin RJ. Effect of appointment scheduling and reminder postcards on adherence to mammography recommendations. J Fam Pract 1990; 30:542-547.
46. Mayer JA, Clapp EJ, Bartholomew S, Offer J. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms. Am J Prev Med 1994; 10:353-356.
47. Harris RP, O'Malley MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med 1990; 6:145-152.
48. Kendall C, Hailey BJ. The relative effectiveness of three reminder letters on making and keeping mammogram appointments. Behav Med 1993; 19:29-34.
49. King ES, Rimer BK, Seay J, Balshem A, Engstrom PF. Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective? Am J Public Health 1994; 84:104-106.
50. Hurley SF, Jolley DJ, Livingston PM, Reading D, Cockburn J, Flint-Richter D. Effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammographic screening program to detect breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84(11):855-863.
51. Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, Stengle W, Warbasse L, Moncrease A. Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings: a randomized controlled trial of computerized reminders as a component of a program to facilitate mammography [see comments]. Med Care 1994; 32:609-624.
52. Lantz PM, Stencil D, Lippert MT, Beversdorf S, Jaros L, Remington PL. Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls. Am J Public Health 1995; 85:834-836.
53. Trock B, Rimer BK, King E, Balshem A, Cristinzio CS, Engstrom PF. Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1993; 2:151-156.
54. Taplin SH, Anderman C, Grothaus L, Curry S, Montano D. Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:571-574.