False-negative core biopsy of the breast

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 171, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 927-930

  Racenstein, Michael J ^a   Berlin, Leonard ^a,b  

^a RUSH NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CASE REPORT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALPRACTICE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 0031657171     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762970     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Basset L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB, et al. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the joint task force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons and College of American Pathologists. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:171-190
2. Brenner RJ, Berlin L. Evaluation of the mammographic abnormality. AJR 1996;167:17-19
3. Physician Insurers Association of America. Breast cancer study. Washington, DC: Physician Insurers Association of America, 1995
4. Rubin E, Dempsey PJ, Pile NS, et al. Needle-localization biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. Radiology 1995;195:627-631
5. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Torino I. Cancelled stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: analysis of 89 cases. Radiology 1997;205: 423-428
6. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR 1994; 162:815-820
7. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR 1996;166:341-346
8. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994;192:793-795
9. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 1995;197:739-742
10. Krebs TL, Berg WA, Severson MJ, et al. Large-core biopsy guns: comparison for yield of breast tissue. Radiology 1996;200:365-368
11. Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT. Critical pathways in percutaneous breast intervention. Radio-Graphics 1995;15:946-950
12. Mainiero MB, Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications: correlation of target accuracy and diagnosis with lesion size. Radiology 1996;198:665-669
13. Tornos C, Silva E, El-Naggar A, Pritzker KPH. Calcium oxalate crystals in breast biopsies: the missing microcalcifications. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:961-968
14. Liberman L, Evans WP, Dershaw DD, et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 190:223-225
15. Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough? Radiology 1996;198: 313-315
16. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-364
17. Berlin L. Tracking for breast cancer (commentary). AJR 1998;170:93-95
18. Pal S, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL. Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration of non-palpable breast lesions: a retrospective study. Radiology 1996;201:71-74
19. Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR 1998;170:89-92
20. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for performance of stereotactically guided breast interventional procedures. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1996
21. Sickles EA. Quality assurance: how to audit your own mammography practice. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:265-275
22. Berlin L. Informed consent. AJR 1997;169:15-18
23. Berlin L. Communication of the significant but not urgent finding. AJR 1997;168:329-331