A representation for planar point contact joints in the multibody mechanical bond graph library

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering

Volumn 212, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 305-312

  Favre, W ^a   Scavarda, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Multibody mechanical systems; Multibond graph; Point contact joint; Singular perturbation formulation

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; JOINING; MECHANICS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBLEM SOLVING;

MULTIBODY MECHANICAL SYSTEMS; MULTIBOND GRAPH; POINT CONTACT JOINT;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 0031628173     PISSN: 09596518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/0959651981539488     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AMESim and AMESet, Reference Guide, 1994 (Imagine, Roanne, Fiance).
2. Olmeco Consortium. OLMECO: Open Library for Models of MEchatronic Components. ESPRIT proposal EC 60521, Brussels, Belgium, 1991.
3. Elmqvist, H. A structured model language for language continuous systems. PhD thesis TFRT 3179, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1978.
4. Karnopp, D. C. and Rosenberg,-R. C. System Dynamics: A Unified Approach, 1975, 402 pp. (John Wiley, New York).
5. Bos, A. M. Modelling multibody systems in terms of multibond graphs. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 1986, 225 pp.
6. Favrc, W. and Scararda, S. Application of the bond graph privileged frame representation to the example of a delta robot. In Proceedings of the CESA'96 IMACS Multiconference on Computational Engineering in Systems Applications, Lille, France, 9-12 July 1996, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 518-522.
7. Favre, W. and Scavarda, S. Bond graph representation of multibody systems with kinematic loops. J. Franklin Inst., 1998, 335B(4), 643-660.
8. Fclez, J., Vera, C., San Jose, I. and Cacho, R. BONDYN: a bond graph based simulation program for multibody Systems. J. Dynamic Syst.,Measmt, Control, 1990, 112(4), 717-727.
9. Dct, F. Modélisation en bond graphs, simulation et commande d'une pince àsouder électropneumatique. PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 1991,278pp.
10. Zcid, A. and Chung, C. Bond graph modelling of multibody systems: a library of three-dimensional joints. J. Franklin Inst., 1992, 329(4), 605-636.
11. Nikravesh, P. E. Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, 1988, 369pp. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
12. Zeid, A. Bond graph modelling of planar mechanisms with realistic joint effects. J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt, Control, 1989, 111(1), 15-23.
13. Zeid, A. A. and Ovcrholt, J. L. Modelling of multibody systems connected by standard engineering joints. Mech. Structs Machines, 1995, 23(2), 273-307.
14. Zcid, A. and Ovcrholt, J. L. Singularly perturbed bond graph models for simulation of multibody systems. J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt, Control, 1995, 117(3), 401-410.
15. Zcid, A. and Overholt, J. L. Singularly perturbed formulation: explicit modelling of multibody systems. J. Franklin Inst., 1995, 332B(1), 21-45.
16. Breedvcld, P. C. Proposition for an unambiguous vector bond graph notation. J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt, Control, 1982, 104(3), 267-270.
17. Breedvcld, P. C. Multibond graph elements in physical systems theory. J. Franklin Inst., 1985, 319(1/2), 1-36.
18. Van Dijk, J. On the role of bond graph causality in modelling mechatronic systems. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 1994, 220 pp.
19. Breedvcld, P. C. The context-dependent tradeoff between conceptual and computational complexity illustrated by the modelling and simulation of colliding objects. In Proceedings of the CESA'96 IMACS Multiconference on Computational Engineering in Systems Applications, Lille, France, 9-12 July 1996, Vol. 2, No. 2.
20. Favre, W. Contribution àla représentation bond graph des systèmes mécaniques multicorps. PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 1997.
21. 20-Sim. Reference Manual-Version 2.0. Controllab Products Inc., 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands, November 1996.
22. Kokotovic, P. V., Khalil, H. K. and O'Reilly, J. Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design, 1986 (Academic Press).
23. Borne, P., Dauphin-Tanguy, G., Ricnard, J.-P., Rotella, F. and Zambcttakis, I. Modélisation et Identification des Processes, 1992, Vol. 2, 309 pp. (Editions Technip, Paris).
24. Margolis, D. L. Bond graphs, normal modes and vehicular structures. Veit. Syst. Dynamics, 1978, 7(1), 49-63.
25. Margolis, D. L. Finite mode bond graph representation of vehicle-guideway interaction problems. J. Franklin Inst., July 1976,302(1), 1-17.
26. Karnopp, D. C. and Margolis, D. L. Analysis and simulation of planar mechanism systems using bond graphs. J. Mech. Des., April 1979, 101, 187-191.
27. Granda, J. J. Bond graph modeling solutions of algebraic loops and differential causality in mechanical and electrical systems. In Proceedings of 10th IASTED International Symposium on Applied Simulation ami Modelling, San Francisco, California, 4-6 June 1984, pp. 188-193.
28. Bayo, E., Jimcncz, J. M., Scrna, M. A. and Bastcro, J. M. Penalty based Hamiltonian equations for the dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems. J. Mecli. Machine Theory, 1994, 29(5), 725-737.
29. Garcia de Jalon, J. and Bayo, E. Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation ofMultibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge, 1994 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
30. Baumgarte, J. Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. In Proceedings of NATO ASI on Computer Aided Analysis and Optimization of Mechanical Systems Dynamics, Iowa City, 1-12 August 1983, 1984, pp. 1-16.