Role of endothelial cell-substrate contact area and fibronectin-receptor affinity in cell adhesion to HEMA/EMA copolymers

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 577-584

  Burmeister, Jeffrey S ^a,b   McKinney, Valerie Z ^a   Reichert, William M ^a   Truskey, George A ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

^b W L GORE AND ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Endothelial cells; Polymer; Surface hydrophobicity; Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ADSORPTION; AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; CONFORMATIONS; GRAFT COPOLYMERS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FIBRONECTIN; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY;

CELLS;

FIBRONECTIN; FIBRONECTIN RECEPTOR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTOR AFFINITY;

EID: 0031573496     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991215)47:4<577::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M. Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 1996;12:463-519.
2. Xiao Y, Truskey GA. The effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of adhesion of endothelial cells to immobilized RGD peptides and adsorbed fibronectin. Biophys J 1996;71: 2869-2884.
3. Ward MD, Hammer DA. A theoretical analysis for the effect of focal contact formation on cell-substrate attachment strength. Biophys J 1993;64:936-959.
4. Horbett TA, Waldburger JJ, Ratner BD, Hoffman AS. Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:383-404.
5. Iuliano DJ, Saavedra SS, Truskey GA. Effect of the conformation and orientation of adsorbed fibronectin on endothelial cell spreading and the strength of adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:1103-1113.
6. Underwood P, Steele J, Dalton B. Effects of polystyrene surface chemistry on the biological activity of solid phase fibronectin and vitronectin, analyzed with monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci 1993;104:793-803.
7. Burmeister JS, Vrany J, Reichert WM, Truskey GA. Effect of fibronectin amount and conformation on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion to HEMA/EMA copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:13-22.
8. Walker DS, Balasubramanian K, Reichert WM. Low loss HEMA/EMA copolymer waveguides with a range of wetting and optical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 1993;49:2147-2155.
9. Rouslahti E, Hayman EG, Pierschbacher MD, Engvall E. Fibronectin: Purification, immunochemical properties, and biological activities. Meth Enzymol 1988;82:803-831.
10. Yamada K. Isolation of fibronectin from plasma and cells. In: Furthmayr H, editor. Immunochemistry of the extracellular matrix. Vol. 1. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc.; 1982. p 111-123.
11. Truskey GA, Burmeister JS, Grapa E, Reichert WM. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM). II. Topographical mapping of relative cell/substratum separation distances. J Cell Sci 1992;103:491-499.
12. Reichert WM, Truskey GA. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRF). I. Modeling of cell contact region fluorescence. J Cell Sci 1990;96:219-230.
13. Burmeister JS, Truskey GA, Reichert WM. Quantitative analysis of variable-angle total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (VA-TIRFM) of cell/substrate contacts. J Microscopy 1994;173:39-51.
14. Chen WT, Singer SJ. Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell-substratum and cell-cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1982;95:205-222.
15. Izzard CS, Lochner LR. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: An interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci 1976;21:129-159.
16. Dembo M, Torney DC, Saxman K, Hammer DA. The reactionlimited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc Royal Soc 1988;234:55-83.
17. Kuo SC, Lauffenburger DA. Relationship between receptor/ ligand binding affinity and adhesion strength. Biophys J 1993; 65:2191-2200.
18. nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1988. 718 pp.
19. Chen C, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides G, Ingber D. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997;276:1425-1428.
20. Akiyama SK, Yamada KA. The interaction of plasma fibronectin with fibroblastic cells in suspension. J Biol Chem 1985;260:4492-4500.
21. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E. Influence of stereochemistry of the sequence Arg-Gly-Asp-Xaa on binding specificity in cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 1987;262:17294-17298.
22. Burmeister JS. A TIRFM investigation of endothelial cell adhesion to hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers. [PhD Thesis]. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University; 1995.
23. Truskey GA, Proulx TL. Relationship between 3T3 cell spreading and the strength of adhesion on glass and silane surfaces. Biomaterials 1993;14:243-254.
24. Weiss L. Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture. IV. The alteration of substrata by cell surfaces. Exp Cell Res 1961;25: 504-517.
25. Leckband D, Muller W, Schmitt F-J, Ringsdorf H. Molecular mechanisms determining the strength of receptor-mediated intermembrane adhesion. Biophys J 1995;69:1162-1169.
26. Evans E, Berk D, Leung A. Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells. I. Forces to rupture molecular-point attachments. Biophys J 1991;59:838-848.
27. Tha SP, Goldsmith HL. Interaction forces between red cells agglutinated by antibody. III. Micromanipulation. Biophys J 1988;53:677-687.
28. Plopper G, Ingber DE. Rapid induction and isolation of focal adhesion complexes. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1993;193: 571-578.