A process approach to remediating word-decoding deficiencies in chapter 1 children

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 93-101

  Carlson, Jerry S ^a   Das, J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031531617     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511217     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
2. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Belmont, J., & Butterfield, E. (1971). What the development of short-term memory is. Human Development, 14, 236-248.
4. Birman, B., Orland, M., Jung, R., Anson, R., Garcia, G., Moore, M., Funkhouser, J., Morrison, D., Turnbull, B., & Reisner, E. (1987). The current operation of the Chapter 1 program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
5. Bjorklund, D.F., & Bernholtz, B.R. (1986). The role of knowledge base in the memory performance of good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 367-393.
6. Borkowski, J., & Cavanaugh, J. (1979). Maintenance and generalization of skills and strategies in the retarded. In N.R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory, and research (2nd ed., pp. 567-617). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bowey, J., Cain, M., & Ryan, S. (1992). A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties. Child Development, 63, 999-1011.
8. Brophy, J. (1988). Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement. Potential implications for instruction of Chapter 1 students. Educational Psychologist, 23, 235-286.
9. Brogan, D.R., & Kutner, M.H. (1980). Comparative analyses of pretest-posttest research designs. The American Statistician, 34, 229-232.
10. Campione, J., & Brown, A. (1987). Blending dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 82-114). New York: Guilford.
11. Carlson, J., & Das, J.P. (1992). The cognitive assessment and remediation of Chapter 1 students. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative.
12. Carter, L. (1982). The sustaining effects study. (Hearings before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor: House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, second session.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Carter, L. (1984). The sustaining effects study of compensatory elementary education. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-13.
14. Chall, J., & Curtis, M. (1990). Diagnostic achievement testing in reading. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kampaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 535-551). New York: Guilford.
15. Das, J.P. (1984). Simultaneous and successive processing in children with learning disability. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 34-47.
16. Das, J.P. (in press). A neurocognitive approach to remediation: The PREP model. Canadian Journal of School Psychology.
17. Das, J.P., Kirby, J., & Jarman, R. (1979). Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes. New York: Academic Press.
18. Das, J.P., & Mishra, R. (1991). The relationship between memory span, naming time, speech rate, and reading competence. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 129-139.
19. Das, J.P., Mishra, R.K., & Pool, J. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66-76.
20. Hanushek, E. A. (1981). Throwing money at schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 19-41.
21. Hertzog, C., & Rovine, M. (1985). Repeated-measures analysis of variance in developmental research: Selected issues. Child Development, 15, 787-809.
22. Kennedy, M., Birman, B., & Demaline, R. (1988). The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
23. Little, T., Das, J.P., Carlson, J., & Yachimowicz, D. (1993). The role of hierarchical skills in cognitive ability as moderators of deficits in academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 219-240.
24. Lovett, M., Ransby, M., Hardwick, N., Johns, P., & Donaldson, S. (1989). Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain and Language, 37, 90-121.
25. Naglieri, J. (1992). Two roads diverged in a wood: Choosing G or PASS cognitive processes. In J. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 1, Part A). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26. Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension strategy. Cognition and instruction, 1, 117-125.
27. Paris, S.G., & Oka, E.R. (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 225-56.
28. Rowan, B., & Guthrie, L. (1988). The quality of Chapter 1 instruction: Results from a study of 24 schools. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
29. Share, D., & Stanovich, K. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
30. Siegel, L. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
31. Stanovich, K. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604, 612.
32. Torgesen, J. (1995). Instruction for reading disabled children: Questions about knowledge and practice. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 91-96.
33. Torgesen, J., & Houck, G. (1980). Processing deficiencies in learning disabled children who perform poorly on the digit span task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 141-160.
34. Torgesen, J., Kistner, J., & Morgan, S. (1987). Component processes in working memory. In J. Borkowski & J. Day (Eds.), Memory and cognition in special children: Perspectives on retardation, learning disabilities and giftedness. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., Simmons, K., & Laughon, R. (1990). Identifying phonological coding problems in disabled readers: Naming, counting, or span measures? Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 236-243.
36. Vanecko, J., & Ames, N. (1987). Who benefits from Federal education dollars? The development of ESEA Title 1 allocation policy. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
37. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Federal (Chapter 1) educational spending and effects on poor children. Washington, DC: Learn, Inc.
39. Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Reuised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
40. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1990). Manual for the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.