Treatment of Counterions in Computer Simulations of DNA

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 11, Issue , 1997, Pages 317-372

  Ravishanker, Ganesan ^a   Auffinger, Pascal ^b   Langley, David R ^c   Jayaram, Bhyravabhotla ^d   Young, Matthew A ^a   Beveridge, David L ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUT DE BIOLOGIE MOLÉCULAIRE ET CELLULAIRE   (France)

^c BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

^d INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031516150     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. H. M. Berman, W. K. Olson, D. L. Beveridge, J. Westbrook, A. Gelbin, T. Demeny, S. H. Hsieh, and A. R. Srinivasan, Biophys. J., 63, 751 (1992). The Nucleic Acid Database: A Comprehensive Relational Database of Three-Dimensional Structures of Nucleic Acids. See Web site at Rutgers University, http://ndbserver.rutgers.edu/.
2. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, Jr., M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi, J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535 (1977). The Protein Data Bank: A Computer-Based Archival File for Macromolecular Structures.
3. D. L. Beveridge, S. Swaminathan, G. Ravishanker, J. M. Withka, J. Srinivasan, C. Prevost, S. Louise-May, D. R. Langley, F. M. DiCapua, and P. H. Bolton, in Water and Biological Macromolecules, E. Westhof, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993, pp. 165-225. Molecular Dynamics Simulations on the Hydration, Structure and Motions of DNA Olipomers.
4. W. F. van Gunsteren, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 3, 277 (1993). Molecular Dynamics Studies of Proteins.
5. P. E. Smith and W. F. van Gunsteren, in Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems, W. F. van Gunsteren, P. K. Weiner, and A. J. Wilkinson, Eds., ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 182-211. Methods for the Evaluation of Long-Range Electrostatic Forces in Computer Simulations of Molecular Systems.
6. H.J.C. Berendsen, in Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems, W. F. van Gunsteren, P. K. Weiner, and A. J. Wilkinson, Eds., ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 161-181. Electrostatic-Interactions.
7. W. Saenger, Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
8. R. E. Dickerson, in Structure & Methods, Vol. 3: DNA & RNA, R. H. Sarma and M. H. Sarma, Eds., Adenine Press, New York, 1990, pp. 1-38. What Do We Really Know About B-DNA?
9. R. E. Dickerson, Methods Enzymol., 211, 67 (1991). DNA Structure from A to Z.
10. S. Arnott and D. W. L. Hukins, J. Mol. Biol., 81, 93 (1973). Refinement of the Structure of B-DNA and Implications for the Analysis of X-Ray Diffraction Data from Fibres of Biopolymers.
11. S. Arnott, P. J. Campbell Smith, and R. Chandrasekaran, in CRC Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, G. Fasman, Ed., CRC Press, Cleveland, 1976, Third edition, Nucleic Acids-Vol.II, pp. 411-422. Atomic Coordinates and Molecular Conformations for DNA-DNA, RNA-RNA, and DNA-RNA Helices.
12. S. Arnott, R. Chandrasekaran, D. L. Birdsall, A. G. W. Leslie, and R. L. Ratliffe, Nature, 283, 743 (1980). Left-Handed DNA Helices.
13. W. Fuller and A. Mahendrasingam, in Nucleic Acid Structure, S. Neidle and E. Westhof, Eds., Macmillan Press, London, 1987, pp. 101-131. X-ray Fibre Diffraction Studies of DNA: Recent Results and Future Possibilities.
14. G. S. Manning, Q. Rev. Biophys., 11, 179 (1978). The Molecular Theory of Polyelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to the Electrostatic Properties of Polynucleotides.
15. M. L. Bleam, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77, 3085 (1980). Relative Binding Affinities of Monovalent Cations for Double-Stranded DNA Studied by Sodium-23 NMR.
16. B. H. Zimm and M. Le Bret, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 1, 461 (1983). Counterion Condensation and System Dimensionality.
17. M. R. Reddy, P. J. Rossky, and C. S. Murthy, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 4923 (1987). Counterion Spin Relaxation in DNA Solutions: A Stochastic Dynamics Simulation Study.
18. B. Jayaram, S. Swaminathan, D. L. Beveridge, K. Sharp, and B. Honig, Macromolecules, 23, 3156 (1990). Monte Carlo Simulation Studies on the Structure of the Counterion Atmosphere of B-DNA. Variations on the Primitive Dielectric Model.
19. D. J. Patel and L. Shapiro, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., 16, 423 (1987). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Distance Geometry Studies of DNA Structures in Solution.
20. J. M. Van de Ven and C. W. Hilbers, Eur. J. Biochem., 178, 1 (1988). Nucleic Acids and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
21. D. E. Wemmer, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1, 452 (1991). The Applicability of NMR Methods to the Solution Structure of Nucleic Acids.
22. N. B. Ulyanov and T. L. James, Appl. Magn. Resonance, 7, 21 (1994). Statistical Analysis of DNA Duplex Structures in Solution Derived by High Resolution NMR.
23. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 29, 992 (1990). Computer Simulation of Molecular Dynamics: Methodology, Applications, and Perspectives in Chemistry.
24. G. Ravishanker and D. L. Beveridge, Molecular Dynamics Toolchest Version 2.0: Analysis and Graphical Display of Computer Simulation Results on Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 1995.
25. J. D. Watson and F. H. C. Crick, Nature, 171, 737 (1953). A Structure for Deoxyribonucleic Acid.
26. A. G. W. Leslie, S. Arnott, R. Chandrasekaran, and R. L. Ratliff, J. Mol. Biol., 143, 49 (1980). Polymorphism of DNA Double Helices.
27. F. H. Allen, J. E. Davies, J. J. Galloy, O. Johnson, O. Kennard, C. F. Macrae, E. M. Mitchell, G. F. Mitchell, J. M. Smith, and D. G. Watson, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 31, 187 (1991). The Development of Versions 3 and 4 of the Cambridge Structural Database System.
28. A. H. J. Wang, G. J. Quigley, F. J. Kolpak, J. L. Crawford, J. H. van Boom, G. van der Marel, and A. Rich, Nature, 283, 743 (1979). Molecular Structure of a Left-Handed Double Helical DNA Fragment at Atomic Resolution.
29. R. E. Dickerson and H. R. Drew, J. Mol. Biol., 149, 761 (1981). Structure of a B DNA Dodecamer. II. Influence of Base Sequence on Helix Structure.
30. R. E. Dickerson, M. Bansal, C. R. Calladine, S. Diekmann, W. N. Hunter, O. Kennard, E. von Kitzing, R. Lavery, H. C. M. Nelson, W. K. Olson, W. Saenger, Z. Shakked, H. Sklenar, D. M. Soumpasis, C. S. Tung, A. H. J. Wang, and V. B. Zhurkin, EMBO J., 8, 1 (1989). Definitions and Nomenclature of Nucleic Acid Structure Parameters.
31. M. S. Babcock, E. P. D. Pendault, and W. K. Olson, J. Mol. Biol., 237, 125 (1994). Nucleic Acid Structure Analysis. Mathematics for Local Cartesian and Helical Structure Parameters That Are Truly Comparable Between Structures.
32. R. E. Dickerson, Newhelix, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
33. R. Lavery and H. Sklenar, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 655 (1989). Defining the Structure of Irregular Nucleic Acids: Conventions and Principles.
34. D. Bhattacharyya and M. Bansal, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 10, 213 (1992). Groove Width and Depth of B-DNA Structures Depend on Local Variation in Slide.
35. N. Boutonnet, X. Hui, and K. Zakrzewska, Biopolymers, 33, 479 (1993). Looking into the Grooves of DNA.
36. E. Stofer and R. Lavery, Biopolymers, 34, 337 (1994). Measuring the Geometry of DNA Grooves.
37. R. Lavery, in Structure and Expression, Vol. 3, DNA Bending and Curvature, W. K. Olson, M. H. Sarma, R. H. Sarma, and M. Sundaralingam, Eds., Adenine Press, Schenectady, New York, 1988, pp. 191-211. Junction and Bends in Nucleic Acids: A New Theoretical Modelling Approach.
38. M. A. Young, G. Ravishanker, D. L. Beveridge, and H. M. Berman, Biophys. J., 68, 2452 (1995). Analysis of Local Helix Bending in Crystal Structures of DNA Oligonucleotides and DNA-Protein Complexes.
39. L. Nilsson, G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, A. T. Brunger, and M. Karplus, J. Mol. Biol., 188, 455 (1986). Structure Refinement of Oligonucleotides by Molecular Dynamics with Nuclear Overhauser Effect Interproton Distance Restraints: Application to 5′ d(CGTACG).
40. P. Yip and D. A. Case, J. Magn. Res., 83, 643 (1989). A New Method for Refinement of Macromolecular Structures Based on Nuclear Overhauser Spectra.
41. A. E. Torda and W. F. van Gunsteren, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 143-172. Molecular Modeling Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data.
42. G. S. Manning, J. Chem. Phys., 51, 924 (1969). Limiting Laws and Counterion Condensation in Polyelectrolyte Solutions. 1. Colligative Properties.
43. G. S. Manning, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 23, 117 (1972). Polyelectrolytes.
44. C. F. Anderson, M. T. Record Jr., and P. A. Hart, Biophys. Chem., 7, 301 (1978). Sodium-23 NMR Studies of Cation-DNA Interactions.
45. M. L. Bleam, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., Biochemistry, 22, 5418 (1983). Sodium-23 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Cation-DNA Interactions.
46. S. Padmanabhan, B. Richey, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., Biochemistry, 27, 4367 (1988). Interaction of an N-Methylated Polyamine Analogue, Hexamethonium (2+), with NaDNA: Quantitative N-14 and Na-23 NMR Relaxation Rate Studies of the Cation-Exchange Process.
47. G. S. Manning, K. K. Ebralidse, A. D. Mirzabekov, and A. Rich, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 877 (1989). An Estimate of the Extent of Folding of Nucleosomal DNA by Laterally Asymmetric Neutralization of the Phosphate Groups.
48. M. O. Fenley, G. S. Manning, and W. K. Olson, Biopolymers, 30, 1191 (1990). Approach to the Limit of Counterion Condensation.
49. T. G. Dewey, Biopolymers, 29, 1793 (1990). A Ligand Binding Model of Counterion Condensation to Finite Length Polyelectrolytes.
50. B. Jayaram and D. L. Beveridge, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 4666 (1990). Free Energy of an Arbitrary Charge Distribution Imbedded in Coaxial Cylindrical Dielectric Continua: Application to Conformational Preferences of DNA in Aqueous Solution.
51. A. Pullman, B. Pullman, and R. Lavery, J. Mol. Struct., 93, 85 (1983). Molecular Electrostatic Potential Versus Field. Significance for DNA and Its Constituents.
52. A. E. Garcia and D. M. Soumpasis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 3160 (1989). Harmonic-Vibrations and Thermodynamic Stability of a DNA Oligomer in Monovalent Salt Solution.
53. F. Hirata and R. M. Levy, J. Phys. Chem., 93, 479 (1989). Salt-Induced Conformational Changes in DNA: Analysis Using the Polymer RISM Theory.
54. R. Bacquet and P. J. Rossky, J. Phys. Chem., 88, 2660 (1984). Ionic Atmosphere of Rodlike Polyelectrolytes. A Hypernetted Chain Study.
55. E. Westhof and D. L. Beveridge, in Water Science Reviews, F. Franks, Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 24-123. Hydration of Nucleic Acids.
56. R. J. Bacquet and P. J. Rossky, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 3604 (1988). Ionic Distributions and Competitive Association in DNA/Mixed Salt Solutions.
57. W. H. Braunlin and L. Nordenskiöld, Eur. J. Biochem., 142, 133 (1984). Potassium-39 NMR Study of Potassium Binding to Double Helical DNA.
58. 3+ and Na+ with Helical B-DNA Probed by Cobalt-59 and Sodium-23 NMR.
59. W. H. Braunlin and Q. Xu, Biopolymers, 32, 1703 (1992). Hexaamminecobalt(III) Binding Environments on Double-Helical DNA.
60. 2+ Binding Environments on Natural and Synthetic Polymeric DNA's.
61. S. D. Kennedy and R. G. Bryant, Biophys. J., 50, 669 (1986). Manganese-Deoxyribonucleic Acid Binding Modes.
62. A. P. Williams, C. E. Longfellow, S. M. Freier, R. Kierzek, and D. H. Turner, Biochemistry, 28, 4283 (1989). Laser Temperature-Jump, Spectroscopic, and Thermodynamic Study of Salt Effects on Duplex Formation by dGCATGC.
63. D. Rentzeperis, D. W. Kupke, and L. A. Marky, Biopolymers, 32, 1065 (1992). Differential Hydration of Homopurine Sequences Relative to Alternating Purine/Pyrimidine Sequences.
64. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, Dynamics Calculations.
65. P. S. Subramanian, G. Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1836 (1988). Theoretical Considerations on the "Spine of Hydration" in the Minor Groove of d(CGCGAATTCGCG)·d(GCGCTTAAGCGC): Monte Carlo Computer Simulation.
66. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987. J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Elementary Methods, Wiley, New York, 1992.
67. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987. J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Elementary Methods, Wiley, New York, 1992.
68. T. P. Lybrand, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 295-320. Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems Using Moleclular Dynamics and Free Energy Perturbation Methods. T. P. Straatsma, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 81-127. Free Energy by Molecular Simulation.
69. T. P. Lybrand, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 295-320. Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems Using Moleclular Dynamics and Free Energy Perturbation Methods. T. P. Straatsma, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 81-127. Free Energy by Molecular Simulation.
70. Asp in Aqueous Solution with Counterions.
71. D. A. Pearlman D. A. Case, J. W. Caldwell, W. S. Ross, T. E. Cheatham III, D. M. Ferguson, G. L. Seibel, U. C. Singh, P. Weiner, and P. Kollman, AMBER 4.1, 1995, University of California at San Francisco, CA.
72. A. Rahman and F. H. Stillinger, J. Chem. Phys., 55, 336 (1971). Molecular Dynamics of Liquid Water.
73. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926 (1983). Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water.
74. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, Groningen Molecular Simulation (GROMOS) 87, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1987. See also Ref. 112 re SPC water model.
75. G. Ravishanker, S. Swaminathan, and D. L. Beveridge, WesDyn 2.0: Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Stimulation for Proteins and DNA, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 1994.
76. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz Jr., D. M. Ferguson D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am Chem. Soc., 117, 5179 (1995). A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules.
77. J. Pranata, S. G. Wierschke, and W. L. Jorgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 2810 (1991). OPLS Potential Functions for Nucleottde Bases. Relative Association Constants of Hydrogen-Bonded Base Pairs in Chloroform.
78. W. L. Jorgensen and J. Tirado-Rives, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 1657 (1988). The OPLS Potential Functions for Proteins. Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin.
79. R. J. Loncharich and B. R. Brooks, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 6, 32 (1989). The Effects of Truncating Long-Range Forces on Protein Dynamics.
80. H. Schreiber and O. Steinhauser, Biochemistry, 31, 5856 (1992). Cutoff Size Does Strongly Influence Molecular Dynamics Results on Solvated Polypeptides.
81. P. Auffinger and D. L. Beveridge, Chem. Phys. Lett., 234, 413 (1995). A Simple Test for Evaluating the Truncation Effects in Simulation of Systems Involving Charged Groups.
82. D. H. Kitson, F. Avbelj, J. Moult, D. T. Nguyen, J. E. Mertz, D. Hadzi, and A. T. Hagler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 8920 (1993). On Achieving Better than 1 Å Accuracy in a Simulation of a Large Protein: Streptomyces griseus Protease A.
83. N. Ramadas, G. Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, unpublished results, 1990-1993. Critical evaluation of methodological issues in DNA simulations - A case study using aqueous solution of d(CGCGAATTCGCG) with and without explicit counterions.
84. K. J. McConnell, R. Nirmala, M. A. Young, G., Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 4461 (1994). A Nanosecond Molecular Dynamics Trajectory for a B DNA Double Helix: Evidence for Substates.
85. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. 64, 253 (1921). Die berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale.
86. S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Proc. R. Soc. London. A373, 27 (1980). Simulation of Electrostatic Systems in Periodic Boundary Conditions. I. Lattice Sums and Dielectric Constants.
87. T. A. Darden, D. M. York, and L. G. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 10089 (1993). Particle Mesh Ewald: An N log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems.
88. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. A. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 8577 (1995). A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method.
89. T. E. Cheatham III, J. L. Miller, T. Fox, T. A. Darden, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 4193 (1995). Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Solvated Biomolecular Systems: The Particle Mesh Ewald Method Leads to Stable Trajectories of DNA, RNA, and Proteins.
90. M. A. Young, G. Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, Biophys. J., submitted (1997). Nanosecond Molecular Dynamics Trajectories for a B-DNA Oligonucleotide Based on the AMBER 4.1 Force Field Including Water and Counterions.
91. S. Swaminanthan, G. Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 5027 (1991). Molecular Dynamics of B-DNA Including Water and Counterions: A 140 ps Trajectory for d(CGCGAATTCGCG) Based on the GROMOS Force Field.
92. R. Lavery and H. Sklenar, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 63 (1988). The Definition of Generalized Helicoidal Parameters and of Axis Curvature for Irregular Nucleic Acids.
93. G. Ravishanker, S. Swaminathan, D. L. Beveridge, R. Lavery, and H. Sklenar, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 669 (1989). Conformational and Helicoidal Analysis of 30 ps of Molecular Dynamics on the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) Double Helix: "Curves, Dials and Windows."
94. M. A. L. Eriksson and A. Laaksonen, Biopolymers, 32, 1035 (1992). A Molecular Dynamics Study of Conformational Changes and Hydration of Left-Handed d(CGCGCGCGCGCG), in a Nonsalt Solution.
95. J. Srinivasan, J. M. Withka, and D. L. Beveridge, Biophys. J., 58, 533 (1990). Molecular Dynamics of an In Vacuo Model of Duplex d(CGCGAATTCGCG) in the B-Form Based on the AMBER 3.0 Force Field.
96. V. Fritsch, G. Ravishanker, D. L. Beveridge, and E. Westhof, Biopolymers, 33, 1537 (1993). Molecular Dynamics Simulations of poly(dA) -(dT): Comparisons Between Implicit and Explicit Solvent Representations.
97. S. Falsafi and N. O. Reich, Biopolymers, 33, 459 (1993). Molecular Dynamic Simulations of B-DNA: An Analysis of the Role of Initial Molecular Configuration, Randomly Assigned Velocity Distribution, Long Integration Times, and Nonconstrained Termini.
98. 2.
99. T. R. Forester and I. R. McDonald, Mol. Phys., 72, 643 (1991). Molecular Dynamics Studies of the Behavior of Water Molecules and Small Ions in Concentrated Solutions of Polymeric B-DNA.
100. V. P. Chuprina, U. Heinemann, A. A. Nurislamov, P. Zielenkiewicz, and R. E. Dickerson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 593 (1991). Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Hydration Shell of a B-DNA Decamer Reveals Two Main Types of Minor-Groove Hydration Depending on Groove Width.
101. P. S. Subramanian and D. L. Beveridge, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 1093 (1989). A Theoretical Study of the Aqueous Hydration of Canonical B d(CGCGAATTCGCG): Monte Carlo Simulation and Comparison with Crystallographic Ordered Water Sites.
102. aq at 25°C.
103. M. Le Bret and B. H. Zimm, Biopolymers, 23, 271 (1984). Monte Carlo Determination of the Distribution of Ions About a Cylindrical Polyelectrolyte.
104. C. S. Murthy, R. J. Bacquet, and P. J. Rossky, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 701 (1985). Ionic Distributions Near Polyelectrolytes: A Comparison of Theoretical Approaches.
105. P. Mills, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., J. Phys. Chem 89, 3984 (1985). Monte Carlo Studies of Counterion-DNA Interactions. Comparison of the Radial Distribution of Counterions with Predictions of Other Polyelectrolyte Theories.
106. P. Mills, M. D. Paulsen, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 129, 155 (1986). Monte Carlo Simulations of Counterion Accumulation Near Helical DNA.
107. M. D. Paulsen, C. F. Anderson, and M. T. Record Jr., Biopolymers, 27, 1249 (1988). Counterion Exchange Reactions on DNA: Monte Carlo and Poisson-Boltzmann Analysis.
108. J. Conrad, M. Troll, and B. H. Zimm, Biopolymers, 27, 1711 (1988). Ions Around DNA: Monte Carlo Estimates of Distribution with Improved Electrostatic Potentials.
109. H. R. Drew and R. E. Dickerson, J. Mol. Biol., 151, 535 (1981). Structure of a B-DNA Dodecamer. 3. Geometry of Hydration.
110. S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. A. Case, U. C. Singh, C. Ghio, G. Alagona, S. Profeta, and P. Weiner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 765 (1984). A New Force Field for Molecular Mechanical Simulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins.
111. B. E. Hingerty, R. H. Ritchie, T. L. Ferrel, and J. E. Turner, Biopolymers, 24, 427 (1985). Dielectric Effects in Biopolymers: The Theory of Ionic Saturation Revisited.
112. J. Ramstein and R. Lavery, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 7231 (1988). Energetic Coupling Between DNA Bending and Base Pair Opening.
113. H. L. Gordon and S. Goldman, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 1921 (1992). Simulations of the Counterion and Solvent Distribution Functions Around Two Simple Models of Polyelectrolyte.
114. H. J. C. Berendsen J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, and J. Hermans, in Intermolecular Forces Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration, B. Pullman, Ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981, pp. 331-342. SPC Water Model.
115. 2 in the B, A, and Wrinkled D Conformations.
116. L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Third edition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1960.
117. V. Vlachy and A. D. J. Haymet, J. Chem. Phys., 84, 5874 (1986). A Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulation Study of Polyelectrolyte Soutions.
118. B. Jayaram and D. L. Beveridge, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 2506 (1991). Grand Canonical Monte-Carlo Simulations on Aqueous Solutions of NaCl and NaDNA: Excess Chemical Potentials and Sources of Nonideality in Electrolyte and Polyelectrolyte Solutions.
119. D. M. York, W. Yang, H. Lee, T. A. Darden, and L. G. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc 117, 5001 (1995). Toward the Accurate Modeling of DNA: The Importance of Long-Range Electrostatics.
120. S. Weerasinghe, P. E. Smith, V. Mohan, Y.-K. Cheng, and B. M. Petitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 2147 (1995). Nanosecond Dynamics and Structure of a Model DNA Triplex Helix in Saltwater Solution.
121. S. Vijayakumar and D. L. Beveridge, unpublished data, 1995. MD simulations of lambda repressor protein-DNA complex.
122. D. R. Langley, T. W. Doyle, and D. L. Beveridge, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 4395 (1991). The Dynemicin-DNA Intercalation Complex. A Model Based on DNA Affinity Cleavage and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
123. D. L. Beveridge K. J. McConnell, R. Nirmala, M. A. Young, S. Vijayakumar, and G. Ravishanker in Structure and Reactivity in Aqueous Solution: Characterization of Chemical and Biological Systems, C. J. Cramer and D. G. Truhlar, Eds., ACS Symposiurn Series 568, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C., 1994, pp. 381-394. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA and Protein-DNA Complexes Including Solvent.
124. D. L. Beveridge and G. Ravishanker, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 4, 246 (1994). Molecular Dynamics Studies of DNA.
125. U. C. Singh, S. J. Weiner, and P. A. Kollman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82, 755 (1985). Molecular Dynamics Simulations of d(CGCGA)*d(TCGCG) With and Without "Hydrated" Counterions.
126. G. L. Seibel, U. C. Singh, and P. A. Kollman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 6537 (1985). A Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Double-Helical B-DNA Including Counterions and Water.
127. W. F. van Gunsteren, H. J. C. Berendsen, R. G. Geurtsen, and H. R. J. Zwinderman, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 482, 287 (1986). A Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation of an Eight-Base-Pair DNA Fragment in Aqueous Solution: Comparison with Experimental Two-Dimensional NMR Data.
128. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, GROMOS86: Groningen Molecular Simulation System, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1986.
129. K. N. Swamy and E. Clementi, Biopolymers, 26, 1901 (1987). Hydration Structure and Dynamics of B- and Z-DNA in the Presence of Counterions Via Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
130. O. Matsuoka, E. Clementi, and M. Yoshimine, J. Chem. Phys., 64, 1351 (1976). CI Study of the Water Dimer Potential Surface.
131. A. Laaksonen, L. G. Nilsson, B. Joensson, and O. Teleman, Chem. Phys., 129, 175 (1989). Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Double Helix Z-DNA in Solution.
132. E. Clementi and G. Corongiu, J. Biol. Phys., 11, 33 (1983). Structure of Aggregates of Water and Lithium, Sodium or Potassium Counterions with Nucleic Acid in Solution.
133. S. N. Rao and P. A. Kollman, Biopolymers, 29, 517 (1990). Simulations of the B-DNA Molecular Dynamics of d(CGCGAATTCGCG) and d(CGCGCGCGCGCG): An Analysis of the Role of Initial Geometry and a Comparison of United and All-Atom Models.
134. 6 Minihelix Including Counterions and Water.
135. S. Louise-May and D. L. Beveridge, unpublished work, 1995. Molecular dynamics simulations on the A and B form of d(CGCGAATTCGCG) based on the CHARMM force field.
136. D. R. Langley, G. Ravishanker, and D. L. Beveridge, unpublished data, 1993. MD simulations of d(CCAACGTTCG) using the CHARMM force field.
137. M. Shibata, T. J. Zielinski, and R. Rein, Biopolymers, 31, 211 (1991). A Molecular Dynamics Study of the Effect of G·T Mispairs of the Conformation of DNA in Solution.
138. J. Chandrasekhar, D. C. Spellmeyer, and W. L. Jorgensen, J. Am Chem. Soc., 106, 903 (1984). Energy Component Analysis for Dilute Aqueous Solutions of Li+, Na+, F-, and Cl-Ions.
139. D. H. Powell, A. C. Barnes, J. E. Enderby, G. W. Neilson, P. S. Salmon, Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc., 85, 137 (1988). The Hydration Structure Around Chloride Ions in Aqueous Solution.
140. V. Fritsch and E. Westhof, J. Chim. Phys., 88, 2543 (1991). Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Oligomers Under Various Electrostatic Parameters.
141. V. Fritsch and E. Westhof, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 8271 (1991). Three Center Hydrogen Bonds in DNA: Molecular Dynamics of Poly(dA)*Poly(dT).
142. V. Fritsch and E. Westhof, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 147 (1991). Minimization and Molecular Dynamics Studies of Guanosine and Z-DNA Modified by N-2-Acetylaminofluorene.
143. R. M. Venable, G. Wildmalm, B. R. Brooks, W. Egan, and R. W. Pastor, Biopolymers, 32, 783 (1992). Conformational States of a TT Mismatch from Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Duplex d(CGCGATTCGCG).
144. K. Miaskiewicz, R. Osman, and H. Weinstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 1526 (1992). Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Hydrated d (CGCGAATTCGCG) Dodecamer.
145. A. A. Lipanov and V. P. Chuprina, Nucleic Acid Res., 15, 5833 (1987). The Structure of poly(dA):poly(dT) in a Condensed State and in Solution.